Saturday, September 5 , 2015, 10:35 am | Fair 71.0º

Mark Shields: When It Comes to Guns, There’s No Safety in These Numbers

By Mark Shields |

On April 9, 1968, I was part of the human crush inside Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church not far from six of that year’s presidential candidates: Richard Nixon, Hubert Humphrey, Nelson Rockefeller, George Romney, Eugene McCarthy and Robert Kennedy. Mahalia Jackson gave an unforgettable rendition of Martin Luther King Jr.‘s favorite, “Precious Lord, Take My Hand,” and at the widow’s request a tape of Dr. King speaking just two months earlier about his own funeral was played:

“Tell him (the eulogist) not to talk too long. ... Tell him not to mention that I have a Nobel Peace Prize. That’s not important. ... I want you to be able to say that I did try to feed the hungry. I want you to be able to say that I did try in my life to clothe the naked. I want you to say that I did try to visit those who were in prison.”

After the funeral, many in the church and thousands outside marched in the Georgia heat behind a simple farm wagon drawn by two mules and bearing the mahogany coffin some 3½ miles to Morehouse College for the public service.

Not quite two months later, I was working in the presidential campaign of Kennedy. A week earlier, the New York senator had finished second to McCarthy in the Oregon primary and, in so doing, became the first Kennedy to lose an election. I had been in Oregon and was then working out of San Francisco on the get-out-the-vote effort for the June 4 California primary, the outcome of which would determine whether RFK had a real chance to become the Democratic presidential nominee.

Kennedy won California and, minutes after thanking his supporters in the ballroom of Los Angeles’ Ambassador Hotel, walked through the hotel kitchen, where an assassin waited to shoot and kill him.

King was 39 years old. Kennedy was 42. But those are not the numbers I want you to think about.

In this nation’s wars — including, but not limited to, the Revolutionary, the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the bloodiest of all, our Civil War, the Spanish-American War, World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf War, and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — the price in human lives lost in battle is well beyond steep. In 236 years, 659,073 Americans have died fighting for their country.

In just the 42 years immediately following the assassinations of King and Kennedy — between June 1968 and the end of 2010 (the last year for which, as they say, official figures are available) — the number of civilians killed in the United States by firearms, according to official records, was 1,260,781.

That’s right, nearly twice as many civilian fatalities by firearms as suffered by American service members in wartime — and in less than one-fifth the number of years.

There is no safety in these numbers. Nor in the World Health Organization’s 2011 report on firearm deaths in 23 high-income countries around the globe. This is a group that would include France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Canada, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and the United States. For the most recent year for which results were available from all these countries, there were 7,653 firearm deaths in all the other 22 countries and 29,771 deaths in the United States from firearms.

To put it bluntly, nearly 80 percent of all the deaths from firearms in the First World were here in the U.S.A. This is one aspect of American Exceptionalism in which no resident can take any comfort.

These numbers are real. These numbers are in unacceptable. We’re Americans. We’re better than that.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him, or click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are his own.

comments powered by Disqus

» on 01.20.13 @ 12:15 PM

Now list the same statistic and replace “firearms” with “drugs” (legal and illegal) and I think you will find it far more astounding.

» on 01.20.13 @ 07:29 PM

Mark - It would have been good to back up your numbers if you had shown how many were gang members shooting each other as they would not have bought their guns legally.  How many people were killed by drug dealers from Mexico after the US Government gave the cartels guns? Does this number include criminals that broke into someones house and were removed by a law abiding citizen theatened by the criminal? I think that after you take out the number of people killed by illegal guns/ activities you will find that the number is not as bad as you have tried to make it out to be.

» on 01.20.13 @ 10:35 PM

Dear Mark :

I sincerely wish that there was some way to separate the truth from fiction.

I do believe that nothing is resolved during and emotional period of time witness what happened in Oregon way back when McCarthy defeated one of the Kennedy’s. The same is happening today because some people can emotionally charge others that they represent the truth when in fact this is not the truth.
My suggestion is to look at how schools have eliminated injury and death from fires and attempt to do the same;

Humbly submitted

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.