Wednesday, November 25 , 2015, 4:41 pm | Fair 59º

Karen Telleen-Lawton: The Bittersweet Truth About a Spoonful of Sugar

By Karen Telleen-Lawton, Noozhawk Columnist |

Maybe it’s coincidental that the coldest months of the year are the ones into which we pack our densest consumption of sugar. From Halloween through Christmas and into Valentine’s Day, we throw discipline to the wind and chow on candy cars, candy canes and candy hearts. There’s nothing wrong with a little indulgence, unless you count tooth decay, diabetes, heart disease and myriad obesity-related syndromes.

One-third of American adults and nearly 50 percent of children are obese, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It’s another one of those gnarly public/private issues — a personal choice issue that greatly affects public costs. Fortunately, there’s a win-win solution with a no-no phrase: sugar tax.

Lest this sound radical and new, let me quote the father of economics, Adam Smith. In his The Wealth of Nations (1776), he opined: “Sugar, rum and tobacco are commodities which are nowhere necessaries of life, [but] which are ... objects of almost universal consumption and which are therefore extremely proper subjects of taxation.” A whiskey tax began in 1791, with tobacco following soon after. These taxes have been shown to be effective. Taxes on alcohol and on tobacco are each inversely related to the diseases and deaths attributable to their use.

Many states, including California, already have a tax on soft drinks. But research shows that small taxes, on the order of 1 to 12 percent, do not change behavior. It takes a bigger stick. A recent University of California study projects that a 1-cent-per-once tax on sweetened beverages (adding about 20 cents to the cost of a $1.25 bottle of soda) would prevent in a decade:

» close to 2.4 million cases of diabetes

» 95,000 cases of heart disease

» 8,000 strokes

» 26,000 premature deaths

What a gift to those millions of people, plus their families and friends! Society’s interest, however, is the public cost of processed sugar. Researchers project that this level of tax would yield $17 billion in health-care cost savings over 10 years and $13 billion in tax revenues. Presumably, most or all of the tax revenue would be spent on public service ads and health costs; we’d have to watchdog this.

The American Heart Association recommends limiting sugar intake to 3 teaspoons (12 grams) for children, 5 teaspoons (20 grams) for women and 9 teaspoons (36 grams) for men.
The American Heart Association recommends limiting sugar intake to 3 teaspoons (12 grams) for children, 5 teaspoons (20 grams) for women and 9 teaspoons (36 grams) for men.

A few people — those with great self-discipline or devoid of a sweet tooth — keep their diet free of processed sugar. For the rest of us, the American Heart Association recommends limiting our sugar intake to 3 teaspoons (12 grams) for children, 5 teaspoons (20 grams) for women and 9 teaspoons (36 grams) for men. The average American intake now is 22 grams per day. The natural sugar in fruits and vegetables is part of a healthy diet and doesn’t count in the processed sugar total.

David and I are both incurable dark chocolate lovers and (coincidentally) victims of the middle-age bulge. I’m thinking what might work is a new product: a daily chocolate allowance dispenser. A 30-section dark chocolate bar with each square containing 20 grams of sugar would make a great Valentine’s Day gift.

On second thought, I see that each square in a Trader Joe’s Pound Plus bar contains just a bit over 4 grams of sugar. In theory, I could have more than four squares per day if I had no other processed sugar during the day. It must not be my one-square-a-day allowance that’s hurting me, so I guess it’s back to reading the labels.

Maybe the tax could pay for a bigger font size on the nutrition labels, so I could actually read them.

— Karen Telleen-Lawton’s column is a mélange of observations spanning sustainability from the environment to finance, economics and justice issues. She is a fee-only financial advisor ( and a freelance writer ( Click here to read previous columns. The opinions expressed are her own.

comments powered by Disqus

» on 01.25.13 @ 06:49 PM

Thanks for another thought provoking essay.

Using Adam Smith as a reference is a nice touch too. Wonder how Jeff Harding or Harris Sherline will respond to advice from the esteemed founder of modern, free market capitalist theory?

Meta-analyses of numerous large-sample health studies published by the
Cleveland Clinic, suggest that “effective prevention” in the areas of: tobacco,
alcohol, sodium, fat, sugar consumption, would dramatically reduce onset rates
of many forms of cancer, of cardiovascular disease, and Type 2 Diabetes.

Any Noozhawk reader who tries to get nutritional information from labels on
canned, frozen, or pre-packaged foodstuffs knows that the Big Three (sugar,
salt, fat) are totally out of control among major American retail food companies.

One reason that the “French”, “Italian”, “Greek”, “Mediterranean” diets seem to
be healthier, and lower calorie, is that their national cuisines use much less of
the Big Three in most recipes than American retail-food does.

Good luck to the author and her husband in their quest for healthier eating in
modern America.

» on 01.30.13 @ 02:21 PM

Oh for god’s sake. Will you goodie two shoes stop trying to tell other people how to live? Why is it that teaching people always has to take the form of punitive taxation? People are not that stupid and if by god they want to consume 10 tons of sugar and die from stage 2 diabetes weighing 5 tons then let them alone.

We are supposed to be a friggen FREE society but every time you turn around some god damned do gooder narcissist is telling you what you should or shouldn’t friggen eat, smoke, do or not do. Take care of your self and leave other people alone. Stop meddling in other people’s lives, you’re not that smart, that good or know any better, BUTT OUT!

» on 01.31.13 @ 02:31 PM

Sorry for the bluntness of the last comment. Publius tends to bring out the worst in me. Karen, I applaud your concern, but really what we see is a failure to teach and a failure of real intrinsic values. People who have a values driven life take care of themselves. Values are driven by your belief system and if your belief is in secular materialism I’m sorry but shallow hedonism follows. Both the right and the left suffer from acute myopia when it comes to values, the beliefs that drive them and the behaviors that follow them, punitive taxation as suggested by some, or punitive laws by others don’t work, they never have. What does is believing in something strong enough that laws are unnecessary as well as good intentions preached by others.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.