Friday, September 4 , 2015, 4:54 pm | Fair 74.0º




State Clears the Way for Transfer of Santa Barbara Parking Structures, Lots to City Ownership

Department of Finance reverses an earlier decision regarding former Redevelopment Agency-owned properties

The former Redevelopment Agency-owned parking structure No. 10 is among the Santa Barbara properties eligible for transfer to city ownership.

The former Redevelopment Agency-owned parking structure No. 10 is among the Santa Barbara properties eligible for transfer to city ownership.  (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

By Giana Magnoli, Noozhawk Staff Writer | @magnoli |

The City of Santa Barbara can transfer its former Redevelopment Agency-owned parking structures and lots to city ownership, after the state Department of Finance reversed its earlier decision.

It’s very good news, Assistant City Administrator Paul Casey said. With the dissolution of the RDA last year, he said, the city worried about losing properties in addition to cash assets.

Department of Finance consultant Steve Szalay said the state reviewed information about the parking properties that were previously denied for transfer.

The Department of Finance still objects to transferring the 5.39-acre railroad depot property — which includes parking and the nearby land where a children’s museum is planned — and a Bath Street parcel, but they can be transferred in the future as part of the successor agency’s Long-Range Property Management Plan.

“Finance originally denied the transfer of the parking lots because they were mixed use and open to individuals other than government employees,” Szalay wrote in a letter to the city. “However, based on the unique parking and business improvement area assessment, which was formed in 1971, Finance concurs that these properties should be maintained as governmental purpose and therefore are eligible for immediate transfer.”

The properties include the commuter lots at Cota and Carrillo streets, the 217 Helena St. parking lot, the Garden Street public parking lot, and parking structure Nos. 2, 6, 10, 11 and 12.

The Bath Street property, which the city wants to use for a pocket park, and the railroad depot will need more work before they can be transferred to the city, which is the RDA’s successor agency.

The Long-Range Property Management Plan provides a way to transfer properties that the city wants to keep for future development. Properties don’t have to be liquidated and sold to private parties if they aren’t transferred to the city for governmental purpose, Szalay said.

The City Council will finalize the parking lot transfers at next week’s meeting, according to City Administrator Jim Armstrong. The city will also start to work on its Long-Term Property Management Plan to address the depot and Bath Street properties.

The state did not object to transferring housing assets, Chase Palm Park and the Ortega Water Treatment Facility, which was done in November. The city also handed over about $2 million in housing cash it had at the time RDAs were dissolved.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.




comments powered by Disqus

» on 01.26.13 @ 11:50 AM

I am glad for the citizens of SB that the parking lots are not being sold off, but in many ways it just reinforces bad behavior by the City of SB..
The redevelopment agency of SB was to eliminate blight and build affordable housing.  While the City Council complains constantly about lack of affordable housing they never spent more than the minimum required on affordable housing.  Instead they focused the bulk of the approx $20M a year into areas they felt would generate more tax revenue and income for the City, building parking garages being one of them.
All the while depriving the schools, fire and police money that really belonged to them.

» on 01.26.13 @ 06:06 PM

To bad, here we had a chance to divest government of property, return it and the use to private ownership. 

To use the comment of Grant (big gov.) House when he talked about the State wanting to sell the property it is extortion.  Well, the City used extortion to get most of the property against the will of the property owners. 

The only way we will ever get some balance back to governance is when government divests of its huge holdings.

Speaking of Grant House, (on the Planning Commission) stated “who cares” when it was pointed out a planned intersection would create congestion; Councilman House was seen “J Walking” on Ortega Street and was almost hit. 

Like most politicians of his persuasion, rules only apply to the “common folk.”

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

 

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.