Tuesday, May 24 , 2016, 5:53 am | Mostly Cloudy 54º

Venoco Steps Up Defense of Carpinteria Slant-Drilling Initiative

In face of city officials' fierce opposition, company emphasizes economic benefits, project's rigorous governmental oversight

By Lara Cooper, Noozhawk Staff Writer |

Carpinteria voters will decide in June whether to approve a slant-drilling operation accessing oil deposits off the seaside city’s coast, and although that election is three months away, debate surrounding the issue is already red hot.

The majority of Carpinteria council members have been outspoken about their distaste for the project proposed by Venoco Inc. and placed on the ballot through a citizens’ initiative, saying it circumvents the environmental process.

Because ballot initiatives like the Paredon Oil and Gas Development Initiative aren’t subject to the California Environmental Quality Act before they are passed, Venoco’s approach to get its project directly before voters has raised some eyebrows.

Noozhawk sat down with Venoco community relations manager Lisa Rivas on Friday to hear the company’s perspective on the issue.

Rivas said getting the ballot measure approved is only the first step because the Carpinteria General Plan doesn’t have provisions for slant drilling at an onshore location.  If the ballot measure passes, the General Plan would be changed to allow for that type of drilling.

Venoco has been planning its slant-drilling project for more than a decade, and would like to see a 140-foot drilling rig installed at its Dump Road processing facility. Chevron owned the facility in the 1950s and sold it to Venoco in 1999, and “it’s been there as long as some of these residents and even before,” Rivas said.

Extended-reach, or slant, drilling, would allow access to oil and natural gas in the Santa Barbara Channel without using an offshore platform, and could reach up to 11,000 barrels of oil a day.

More than 1,000 signatures were gathered last year to put the Paredon project, now Measure J, on the June 8 ballot as a citizens’ initiative.

On environmental review, Rivas contends the project will face rigorous oversight on the other side of the ballot box.

A slew of oversight organizations — the state Coastal Commission, State Lands Commission and the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, among others — would still have to review the project after voter approval “to make sure it’s the safest it can be,” Rivas said.

“These are not new regulators to us,” she said. “They do that now with our operations — new and existing. They will have the same oversight in the future of our operations.”

If voters do sign off on Venoco’s proposal, company representatives say Carpinteria and the county would be entitled to royalties and revenue of as much as $200 million. Venoco has also said 20 acres of coastal land would be donated to the city as open space, and $5 million will be donated to the Carpinteria Education Foundation.

The reservoir would also have property taxes, to the tune of $250,000, associated with it that Rivas said would return to city coffers.

Some residents have raised concerns about making sure the money makes its way back into the community.

Rivas said the only way the money wouldn’t end up back in Carpinteria is if the initiative doesn’t pass.

As tempting as the offer could be for anemic city finances, Measure J has received a largely prickly reception from Carpinteria decision makers.

The council voted unanimously to put the measure on the ballot, but the only other option the city had was to approve the project outright. The city has spent almost $300,000 appealing a Superior Court ruling to put the item on the ballot in the first place, which is still mired in the appellate process.

City staff plan to hold informational meetings on the measure, but “there is no objectivity coming anywhere from the council chambers,” according to Rivas, with the council taking an official stance against the project last month. Rivas encouraged the public to read the initiative, which can be viewed by clicking here.

If the ballot measure fails, Rivas says Venoco still has the obligation to develop that oil field, and will go offshore if it must.

However, “if it goes offshore, they don’t have a say,” Rivas said of Carpinteria, adding that that’s why the company wants residents to have a chance to vote on the matter.

What could be extracted from the field, somewhere around 11,000 barrels a day, isn’t significant when compared to larger sources like Saudi Arabia, Rivas said. But she said that all of the leases off the California coast, including Venoco’s, add up to a significant dent in the demand for domestic oil.

“We see a great benefit from an oil project perspective as well as from a community perspective,” she said.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.