Tuesday, October 13 , 2015, 3:01 pm | A Few Clouds 83º

Schneider Moving Ahead with Gathering Signatures for Proposed Ballot Initiatives

The mayor puts one of the proposals on the back burner to avoid conflict with the Santa Barbara school district's parcel tax measure on June's ballot

Santa Barbara Mayor Helene Schneider speaks to the media in February about ballot initiatives she plans to put before voters on the November ballot.
Santa Barbara Mayor Helene Schneider speaks to the media in February about ballot initiatives she plans to put before voters on the November ballot.  (Lara Cooper / Noozhawk file photo)

By Giana Magnoli, Noozhawk Staff Writer | @magnoli |

Santa Barbara Mayor Helene Schneider will begin gathering signatures this week for three of her four proposed November ballot initiatives in the wake of the plan’s first public push-back.

She has proposed a pension reform city charter amendment, an entertainment district business license fee, a half-cent sales tax and appropriating half of the tax revenue to local schools.

But Schneider’s independent move to put the items before voters left many groups out of the planning process, including past political supporters such as city labor groups and the Democratic Central Committee.

At last week’s monthly meeting, the Democratic Central Committee asked Schneider to stop her petitions until there’s more of a community discussion, saying they have “serious reservations,” chair Daraka Larimore-Hall said in a press release. It’s not a final position on the measures, but the group wants to “work on proposed changes to the ballot measures that would meet the goals laid out by the mayor, taking into account the concerns of all affected parties.”

Schneider said she has been meeting with stakeholders since she announced the initiatives on Feb. 7, and will continue to do so.

“I’m still moving forward with collecting signatures unless and until I hear some reason to substantially change it,” the mayor said. “There’s no reason to stop it at this point.”

Schneider said she decided to go directly to voters because “it’s time to create an option for people to consider instead of having debate and nothing happens. The alternative is the status quo, which means significant funding needs and a system that needs some form of cost control with pensions, and the only way to ask on the revenue side is to go to voters anyway.”

She was also unsure whether she could get the unanimous vote needed from the City Council. Fellow council members haven’t discussed the issue publicly since the announcement, except Councilman Frank Hotchkiss, who called the initiatives “smart and courageous” in an op/ed published in Noozhawk.

The initiatives are a package of proposals — the sales tax depends on the pension reform initiative passing — and they have now gone through the City Attorney and City Clerk’s offices. The approved titles and summaries will be on the petitions, which require 15 percent of registered voters to sign for each measure to get on the November ballot.

Schneider said she will use volunteers and will raise funds to hire paid signature gatherers.

The fourth proposal — an advisory measure that would split the sales tax revenue evenly between the city and the Santa Barbara Unified School District — is notably missing from her website and petition efforts. It was not well-received by the education community since SBUSD has a parcel tax measure on the June ballot, and Schneider has decided not to even bring up the advisory measure until after the June election.

“Right now, the most important thing anyone can do is pass the parcel tax in June,” she said. “I want it to be absolutely clear: I don’t want to create any kind of question of what should happen in June versus November.”

As an advisory measure, it needs only the City Council’s approval to qualify for the ballot, so signature-gathering won’t be necessary.

The Santa Barbara Education Foundation supports the mayor’s new position, since the messaging and timing of the parcel tax campaign is critical, according to board member Lynn Rodriguez.

Measures W and X would replace 2008’s parcel tax, which has been funding math, science, music and arts programs at elementary and secondary schools and expires next year. A poll of voters by Godbe Research showed more than 70 percent support for the measures, which would increase the amount to $54 per parcel and bring in $15 million over four years.

The campaign needs to distinguish this measure from other tax measures aimed at funding schools, which is the main reason the measure is scheduled for June instead of November.

“We’re concerned there’s a lot planned for the November ballot … so we’re really trying to get people to focus on the problem right now, not the impact of any alternative measure out there,” Rodriguez said. “If other ones come along in the future and raise money for schools, great, but we want to make sure people don’t say they’ll wait for November and vote for that.”

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

comments powered by Disqus

» on 03.05.12 @ 08:52 PM

Da Mayor is something else, isn’t she?  Here she is promoting her own re-election agenda and her own political party can’t even jump in and support.  And, nice work with ticking off the educators!

» on 03.05.12 @ 09:23 PM

I am voting no on all her ballot initiatives. I want pension reform (not her ineffective reform) and school reform (elimination of tenure and seniority) before I even think about paying higher taxes. I hope the residents of Santa Barbara are not fooled by these so-called reforms and the refusal to go forward with the advisory measure because she knows it may jeopardize the ill-conceived school parcel tax ballot measures.

» on 03.06.12 @ 01:20 AM

What a shame.  “No reason to stop it at this point”?? Really Helene? I guess the concerns expressed by supporters and friends amount to “no reason”.  Good to know that’s how she interprets heartfelt concerns.

» on 03.06.12 @ 03:10 AM

Its always been a Government union spending problem, they dont care about the tax-payers>> YOU!!!

No new taxes—sorry liberal Democrats but the gig is up, and the private sector worker is done with your games.

» on 03.06.12 @ 02:24 PM

It’s absurd that the mayor would unilaterally try to push these initiatives onto the ballot.  She is the elected mayor of this fair city, but is seeking to do a lateral arabesque (translation:  by-pass) the city council on which she has now served for almost a decade, in order to promote her own political agenda.  Is this a personal grandstand play to try to add some sheen to her otherwise lackluster reputation for not wanting to make waves, and for letting our “shadow mayor” City Manager Jim Armstrong tell her and her other two liberal lapdog council veterans, House and White, when and how high to jump?  She, and they, bear a lot of personal responsibility for the city’s current financial condition brought about by overspending on stupid ideas such as painting blue lines around downtown, unnecessary traffic choking bulb-outs and roundabouts, brick crosswalks that crumble when cars drive over them, and, sadly, the list goes on. And now she wants to correct that on the backs of our city workers and the taxpayers.  Her new motto seems to be “spend and tax, cut salaries and pensions, spend those savings on other lame-brain projects, and then tax even more!” And she wants to do it without consulting various stakeholders in the city?  I think this is an example of political arrogance and naivet√© at its pinnacle. I suggest a new motto for her re-election campaign—“SHAME ON SCHNEIDER!”

» on 03.07.12 @ 01:28 PM

Government employees need to put more in our bankrupt system now—Pensions and health, and how about taking only 20 paid days off a year >>not 40-50 days. Crazy union waste on your dime!!

» on 03.08.12 @ 09:58 PM

Actually, it’s somewhat refreshing to see our mayor make a move with the approval of the local Democratic/Socialist machine.  And one could fully expect that machine to be against anything that smells of getting the unions under control.  Those same unions that are bankrupting the city.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.