Tuesday, September 1 , 2015, 8:07 pm | Mostly Cloudy 72.0º




Joe Conason: The Return of the Real John McCain

GOP senator breaks ranks to refute the use of torture against suspected terrorists

By Joe Conason |

For the longest time, a certain admirable, independent senator from Arizona disappeared from public life, replaced by an irresponsible, opportunistic and occasionally demagogic figure who seemed to have been warped by his presidential ambitions and his disappointment in losing. But John McCain has now returned, just in time to refute the sinister attempt by his fellow Republicans to justify torture as the instrument of Osama bin Laden’s demise.

During the last administration, even as a supporter of the Iraq invasion and the war on terror, McCain broke ranks with his party to protest the worst excesses of the George W. Bush presidency. In one of the most memorable moments of the otherwise desultory Republican primary debates in 2008, he cited the Constitution, the Geneva Conventions and American military tradition to upbraid Mitt Romney for waffling on the issue of waterboarding. “This is what America is all about,” he said indignantly. “This is a defining issue.”

With every right-wing enabler from John Yoo to Marc Thiessen and Liz Cheney suddenly stepping forward to suggest that that the death of bin Laden absolves Bush-era criminality, it is refreshing to hear McCain’s clear, strong voice of opposition.

The torture advocates have claimed that the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a high-ranking leader in al-Qaeda and an alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, caused him to reveal the identity of a courier whose trail led, almost seven years later, to the hideout in Abbotabad, Pakistan.

McCain is having none of this nonsense, as he explains in a blistering essay published in The Washington Post:

“The trail to bin Laden did not begin with a disclosure from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was waterboarded 183 times. The first mention of Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti — the nickname of the al-Qaeda courier who ultimately led us to bin Laden — as well as a description of him as an important member of al-Qaeda, came from a detainee held in another country, who we believe was not tortured. None of the three detainees who were waterboarded provided Abu Ahmed’s real name, his whereabouts or an accurate description of his role in al-Qaeda. In fact, the use of ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed produced false and misleading information.”

Owing to his own experience of brutality at the hands of his North Vietnamese captors as a prisoner of war, McCain possesses a moral authority on the subject that no other American politician can claim. He also understands — from the perspective of someone who was once subjected to “enhanced interrogation” — why extreme pain and fear tend to produce unreliable information:

“I know from personal experience that the abuse of prisoners ... often produces bad intelligence because under torture a person will say anything he thinks his captors want to hear — true or false — if he believes it will relieve his suffering. Often, information provided to stop the torture is deliberately misleading.”

Why is this still important? McCain doesn’t believe that those who ordered and implemented the crimes of the past should be punished, although not everyone in this country or elsewhere agrees. But he is certainly correct when he says that any endorsement of torture endangers American soldiers who may someday be captured in conflict abroad. And he is yet more astute in noting that amid the Arab democratic awakening — which we hope will repudiate everything represented by al-Qaeda and its unlamented leader — our country must “stand as an example of a nation that holds an individual’s human rights as superior to the will of the majority or the wishes of government.”

Boasting that torture vanquished our worst enemy is wrong, stupid and unbecoming to a democracy that lost so much moral authority by violating the principles of our founders during the past decade. As McCain might say, that was a mistake we cannot afford to repeat.

Joe Conason writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information, or click here to contact him.




comments powered by Disqus

» on 05.13.11 @ 01:14 PM

That is great news!  It is so comforting that terrorists will no longer drag bodies through the street, have pictures of captured with swollen faces and cuts, cut off heads and have it video taped for release….only because we won’t waterboard!  I bet our soldiers and contractors feel so much better now that they don’t have to worry about that!  The genius of you guys overwhelms me!

» on 05.13.11 @ 05:42 PM

Yes, good news.

McCain may not like Obama (in which he is not alone).

But he and his fellow captors at the Hanoi Hilton swore solemn oaths to each other that if they survived their imprisonment and repeated torture, they would try to do whatever it took to make sure that no other POWS would ever have to endure that again.

McCain’s old military sense of honor has proven in the end to be stronger than the pressure of his Party’s caucus, or the jackass braying of Cheney & John Yoo.

You go, John!

» on 05.14.11 @ 01:06 PM

A lopsided article that conveniently ignores the accumulative effects of interrogation and the selective use of waterboarding that many in congress approved and now denounce. Do you would think it could be for political reasons? Mr Conason’s article ingratiates the party line that can be heard ad nauseum from the beltway through the tabloids that pass for news.
It is apparent that Mr Conason believes that you can say anything without warrant and expect the people to believe it. Insulting to say the least! To think the demise of osama was all obama is the delusion of a failed presidency and this article is nothing more than a crutch hoping obama can limp on for another term.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.

 

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.