Tuesday, October 6 , 2015, 8:31 pm | Fair 64º

Santa Barbara School District to Put Parcel-Tax Measures on November Ballot, at Lower Rate

Board of Education also approves the 2012-13 budget, taking into account $5.5 million in possible midyear cuts

The Santa Barbara Education Foundation will run the school district’s parcel tax campaign again for November. The foundation’s new board president, Sal Guereña, was confident of a victory this time, saying the group would redouble its efforts.
The Santa Barbara Education Foundation will run the school district’s parcel tax campaign again for November. The foundation’s new board president, Sal Guereña, was confident of a victory this time, saying the group would redouble its efforts.  (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

By Giana Magnoli, Noozhawk Staff Writer | @magnoli |

In an effort to garner overwhelming voter support in November’s election, the Santa Barbara Unified School District Board of Education decided Tuesday night to drop the $54-per-parcel amount from June’s failed parcel-tax ballot measures to $45 per parcel in the secondary district and $48 per parcel in the elementary district.

Board members voted unanimously to support the second try at funding, which would protect math, science, music, arts, technology and foreign language programs supported by Measures H and I, parcel taxes passed in 2008. Officials said that if the measures fail in November, many programs are likely to be cut, maybe even eliminated.

The Santa Barbara Education Foundation, which has run the last three campaigns for the district, will head the effort again, according to incoming board president Sal Guereña.

“We will double our efforts in November,” he said.

School board members were confident that the $54-per-parcel plan was needed, but worried about being able to get the necessary two-thirds majority approval. On June 5, the measures failed by a narrow margin, with one of them behind by about 120 votes.

Board member Annette Cordero worried that a lowered amount may be construed as the district needing less, which isn’t true. She said the district needs everything that was outlined in Measures W and X, and those programs will need every penny the parcel tax can provide — maybe even more.

“Just minutes ago we talked about how we have one plumber for the entire district; 15,000 students over 20 sites, and one plumber,” member Monique Limon said. “Though this won’t support needs in those areas, it allows us to provide programs that we otherwise wouldn’t be able to provide.”

Bryan Godbe, a consultant who did polling and recommended that the district pursue the parcel taxes in June, suggested that the amount be lowered and the dialogue be focused on the need, not the amount, according to board president Susan Deacon.

“That would be heartbreaking if we lost again, so I feel the burden to do whatever we can to ensure that they pass,” she said emotionally, breaking up a little. “If they’re not passed in November, our schools are not going to look like what people think they should look like anymore. They just won’t, and they’re already hurting.”

If approved, the parcel-tax measures would provide revenue to support math, science, technology education, music, arts, foreign language and theater, and augment career skills courses, according to the district and ballot language. An independent citizens committee would oversee the spending, and money could not be seized by the state.

“Class size reduction” language isn’t included in the ballot measure because of its expense. To reduce K-3 class sizes by one student, from 25 to 24, would cost $15 per parcel in the elementary district, according to Superintendent Dave Cash. It would cost $70.95 per parcel to get 20-student classes in K-3. By taking out the ninth-grade math reduction included in Measures H and I, he said, more money will be available for materials and other programs.

There are 24,000 parcels in the elementary school district and 52,000 parcels in the secondary school district, which includes both Santa Barbara and Goleta.

“I think it’s going to take all of us and then some,” Lynn Rodriguez, the outgoing Education Foundation board president, said after the meeting.

She and other board members said the campaign will have to focus on the district’s successes, even with state cuts, and a clear message about what the measures would provide for students.

Also on Tuesday night, the board approved the 2012-13 budget, which includes seven days of employee furloughs and five fewer days of school for students.

Meg Jette, assistant superintendent of business services, said she assumes Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax initiative in November will fail, bringing $5.5 million in midyear cuts, and the district budgeted accordingly.

“I’m half empty,” she said.

“You’re half empty and I’m half full, but I’m also half smart,” Cash said. “You have to prepare for the worst-case scenario and hope for the best.”

The district is still deficit spending, with a budget of $109 million in expenditures and $108 million in revenues. The 3 percent reserve level is met, but just barely, Jette said.

Revenues are projected to drop 7.9 percent from the current year, and expenditures are cut 9.9 percent from the 2011-12 budget.

Transitional kindergarten is planned to start in fall, though it’s unclear how much state funding is going to be allocated until the budget is passed, according to the staff report.

The district’s largest restricted program is special education, which is underfunded by a huge margin.

Jette noted that federal and state government revenues provide about $5 million, but the district spends about $20 million per year, which encroaches on the general fund.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

comments powered by Disqus

» on 06.27.12 @ 11:21 AM

This is going to be interesting.

Mr. Segal, if you’re out there, what are your feelings on this?

» on 06.27.12 @ 01:03 PM

I think Mr. Segal has made some very good points in his arguments over school board issues and I appreciate reading his views as I learn more and more about the issues.

Mr. Segal, have you thought about running for school board?

» on 06.27.12 @ 01:23 PM

I agree. While I might hold different opinions on some points, he is a smart man, who would do well as a differing opinion on the board.

» on 06.27.12 @ 03:44 PM

Campaign issue: stop putting teacher union candidates on both sides of the bargaining table like you have right now with Deacon, Limon, Cordero etc. There is your majority vote for these teacher union schemes, so this is how it works.

Their only solution is more parcel taxes to balance their bloated and badly allocated budgets. This is what you get from the present teacher union school board members.

Any school board that has to go begging to put on science and math classes has its priorities all wrong. And has for a long time.  You cannot bring reform, fiscal prudence or common sense to our schools as long as you keep voting in teacher union board majorities.

Look for the independent candidates in the next school board election if you want to stop this endless tax and spend nonsense. Or in this case, spend and then perpetually tax nonsense. Their campaign consultant did warn them about voter backlash. They should have listened.

Send them the message they are still not hearing. No teacher union reform means no new taxes and no permanent parcel tax renewals.

» on 06.28.12 @ 11:59 AM

This tax will fail again because we need to pay off the other 8 parcel taxes first. What happen to the One time temporary parcel tax? Its never one time with Democrats, and their corrupt unions.

Its a huge spending problem in Government, they are terrible managers of our money, and these losers would fail in the real world-(They are private sector rejects)

» on 07.18.12 @ 07:42 AM

Just saw this article. I intend to fight these Measures. I am writing opposition language for the ballot, so the voters will understand the other side of the story. Sy Prey is absolutely correct - having union supporters on both sides of the negotiating table is the single biggest deterrent for ushering in school reform.  Teacher tenure, seniority and curriculum overhaul must happen before our schools are capable of doing the job we all demand of them. These band aid approaches don’t do anything to change the dysfunctional culture in our public schools.

Recently Das Williams opposed a bill that would have made it easier to fire teachers charged with sexual abuse of children. If that is not indicative of the power of teacher unions, nothing is.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.