Thursday, February 11 , 2016, 3:01 am | Fair 49º

Santa Barbara Airport Fields Public’s Questions, Concerns About Master Plan

Officials hold the second of four informational workshops to discuss the process

By Patrick Kulp, Noozhawk Intern | @NoozhawkNews |

The Santa Barbara Airport held the second of four informational meetings Wednesday night concerning the preparation of a new Master Plan, fielding questions and comments from concerned members of the public.

The creation of a Master Plan is a process that the airport must undertake every five to seven years in which it evaluates issues such as potential capacity, safety and environmental concerns in the short, intermediate and long term, and develops a list of capital improvements.

Wednesday’s presentation focused on the second stage of the development, which included assessing a forecast of demand for the airport and current capacity, and identifying any potential issues in five-, 10- and 20-year time frames.

The airport will use the information to develop a list of alternatives for resolving the issues that will then be reviewed by the Master Plan Committee and the Federal Aviation Administration. The next meeting of the Master Plan Committee is expected to be in November or December, and the plan tentatively will be finished three to four months later.

The process of assessing the various airport facilities and forecasting demand is being conducted airport consulting firm Coffman and Associates. The firm also has contracted local environmental consulting firm Dudek, Kimley-Horn and Associates for traffic and parking, and Communiquest for community outreach.

Assistant Airport Director Hazel Johns said the Master Plan process includes balancing the input of 14 to 17 agencies, including the FAA, airport patrons and tenants, and the surrounding community.

Johns said while the stage of the development process will not bring any drastic changes for the airport, there were issues raised that will need attention in the next stage.

“The general aviation community feels the need for more general hangar facilities and additional parking closer to the new terminal,” Johns said. “We’d really like to meet the needs of the aviation community, but also balance financial and environmental concerns.”

According to Johns, there are many areas of the airport that are currently zoned for aviation but have not yet been developed, and many tenants of the airport would like to see these areas turned into additional hangars.

Coffman and Associates airport planner Eric Pfeifer said that in addition to the hangar space, one of the complaints the firm often hears is the loudness of airport activity in the surrounding community. In order to deal with the issue, the firm develops noise contours of how the noise levels of the airport affect different areas and tries to work around incompatible locations such as schools.

Pfeifer said balancing the task of finding space for necessary improvements with such a variety of interests at play is not an easy task.

“We’re not necessarily proposing changes yet but looking at the facility requirements and seeing what might be needed going forward,” Pfeifer said. “One of the most important issues is finding space to fit all these requirements. That will be the fun part.”

Local pilot Paul Bowen said he would like to see the airport once again become more accessible for the general aviation community, adding that one of the most difficult aspects of that is balancing the airport’s economic interests with its accessibility.

“The primary purpose of the airport is economic. There is obviously a tremendous amount of wealth in the area, and if you look at the number of corporate executive jets flying in and out, there has been a huge increase,” Bowen said. “My concern is, how do we keep the airport open to light general aviation, but at the same time make it work financially?”

Bowen said he hopes that the collective expertise of everyone working on the project will result in a viable answer.

“I’m sorry to say that I don’t have a magical answer to this, and I don’t think anyone does,” Bowen said. “Hopefully we can get a bunch of people together who have an idea about this and an idea about that and piece it all together.”

Noozhawk intern Patrick Kulp can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

» on 07.12.12 @ 02:50 PM

Before the SBA talks about expanding its uses they need to address the biggest problem they now have and that is their integration into the surrounding community. The integration of air traffic onto surface streets is an astounding embarrassment. The local surface streets are totally inadequate and the surrounding development makes Goleta look like a friggin slum. Nothing says this place stinks like the drive up Fairview to Hollister from the airport. Nothing says ass backward and incompetent than the connector to Ward Memorial. This is for many travelers the very first look they have of our community and it reeks, literally and figuratively. It’s an eyesore.

What to do.

Widen Fairview to 4 lanes divided to Hollister and 6 to the freeway and on to Calle Real.

Widen Ward to 4 lanes to the campus and through to El Colegio. Extend El Colegio to the west and connect to Cathedral Oaks and Hollister.

Extend Turnpike south then west from Hollister as a 4 lane street, parallel to the creek and then swing it up and over Ward to terminate at the airport with a ¾ clover leaf interchange at Ward. Fairview/Fowler would terminate into this new extension.

Widen all north/south arterials (Glen Annie/Stork, Los Caneros, Fairview, Patterson and Turnpike) to 4 lanes minimum from Cathedral Oaks south to the new southern arterial formed from Turnpike/Ward/El Colegio, and 6 lanes between Calle Real and Hollister over the freeway.

Widen Cathedral Oaks to 4 lanes from 192 west to Hollister.

This would create a 4 lane arterial system with an approximation of a 1 mile grid. It would allow complete airport, UCSB and local hospitality industries fast pollution free access to one another while eliminating 4 decades of neglect by UCSB, SBA, SB County and local municipalities.

Then work on cleaning up the industrial junk yard accumulating at the southern end of Fairview (biggest eyesore and turn off) and restore the tidal flushing of the slough under Ward (plug yer nose).

This would be very expensive and ¾ should be financed by UCSB, the biggest impact and greatest laggard in mitigating that impact. The ¼ left should be split three ways between SB County, SB and Goleta.

» on 07.12.12 @ 05:26 PM

And here comes the issue of Goleta Beach 2.0

The environmental left would allow the erosion of the beach and take out the parking lot that is the first line of defense for both Hwy 217 and the airport.  Since this faction has stated repeatedly they are not in favor of any defense against the natural erosion process all those in favor of more general aviation and commercial activity.

Unless Wolf and Carbajal are willing to tell these destructo’s too bad the status and airport are of overriding importance 10 years from now the airport will be forced to build a significant seawall that will impact the slew and animals.

This is going to be an interesting fight.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.