Wednesday, June 19 , 2013, 1:06 am | Fair 64.0º




Santa Barbara Program Helping Homeowners See Bright Side of Going Solar

Community Environmental Council launches its second year of connecting residents and contractors to reduce electricity costs

Santa Barbara County 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf speaks during a celebration at her home Tuesday to launch the second year of the Community Environmental Council's Solarize Santa Barbara program. Wolf and her husband installed a 22-panel solar power system at their home last year and have seen energy usage drop as a result. (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)
Santa Barbara County 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf speaks during a celebration at her home Tuesday to launch the second year of the Community Environmental Council’s Solarize Santa Barbara program. Wolf and her husband installed a 22-panel solar power system at their home last year and have seen energy usage drop as a result. (Giana Magnoli / Noozhawk photo)

By Giana Magnoli, Noozhawk Staff Writer | @magnoli |


The Community Environmental Council of Santa Barbara is helping local homeowners go solar again this year in a partnership with REC Solar and California Solar Electric.

Homeowners on the South Coast can buy or lease solar panel systems at discounted prices through the CEC’s Solarize Santa Barbara program. Partnerships with the solar contractors mean discounted prices for customers for the three months of the program, so residents can reduce their electricity costs.

Last year’s pilot program went from May through July, and this year homeowners can sign up until Nov. 9, according to Megan Birney, the CEC’s energy program manager. She added that there’s more of an emphasis on leasing this year, since it has less of an upfront cost for residents and still brings immediate electricity savings.

Santa Barbara County 2nd District Supervisor Janet Wolf hosted the program launch at her home Tuesday, where she and her husband, Harvey, installed a 5.3-kilowatt system last year. She said they saw their electricity bill drop to less than $20 per month from $200 or more per month.

Financing assistance from emPowerSBC, a county organization, is available to help with the upfront investment, and the CEC helps homeowners through the process, Wolf said. She and her husband said they consider it an investment in their home, the local economy and the environment.

Wolf added that it was a smart financial decision, too, with rebates, tax incentives and increased property value.

Her family added 22 panels on the roof and they were pumping out 4,023 watts at the time of Tuesday’s news conference, which fed energy back into the grid.

“It’s amazing — it feels like I have a little energy station,” Wolf said.

Wolf said her longtime friends, Elisa and Joe Atwill, also installed a solar system last year, and joked that the two families are competing to eliminate their fossil-fuel use.

The Atwills love their solar panels on their Montecito home and recently bought an electric car. Elisa Atwill said their Nissan Leaf costs a fraction per 100 miles compared with their previous car and, with their solar panels, literally runs on sunshine.

Joe Atwill said going solar is the right choice for the environment and your pocketbook. They both became fascinated watching the meter go backward as electricity usage plummeted. Since they readily admit they aren’t the most tech-savvy people, they decided to lease a system so the energy company would handle all installation and maintenance.

Forty-nine homeowners installed solar panels last year as part of the Solarize Santa Barbara program, and the CEC encourages people who are spending $100 or more monthly for electricity to consider signing up.

Workshops are scheduled for interested homeowners throughout the South Coast: 6:30 to 8 p.m. Aug. 21 at the Goleta Valley Community Center, 6:30 to 8 p.m. Sept. 17 at the Carpinteria Womans Club and 6:30 to 8 p.m. Oct. 23 at the Unitarian Society of Santa Barbara.

Stacey and Chris Ulep of San Roque said they added a solar panel system during a major renovation last year and that it has provided all of their electricity ever since. They said they chose a 20-year lease to save on upfront costs, and the 14 panels have even outperformed what the leasing company estimated.

“It really seemed like a no-brainer, we get so much sun here,” Chris Ulep said. “That is a big thrill, to understand the impact we’re making by adding solar panels to our home.”

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.



Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 08.08.12 @ 09:43 AM

Enjoy your new solar panels.
“Wolf added that it was a smart financial decision, too, with rebates, tax incentives and increased property value.”
As a taxpayer you can thank me for contributing to your good fortune.

» on 08.08.12 @ 12:30 PM

*Laugh*  sandflea beat me to it….isn’t that a great quote!  Ok up the ante “Financing assistance from emPowerSBC, a county organization,....”  The KW hour costs compared to commercial source is out the roof (pun intended).

This is a Supervisor who has never seen a left agenda she would not embrace regardless of the hit on the taxpayer dollar.  But what would you expect from someone that would put up with an attorney type who’s reputation is willing to break any ethical law to win a case.  The problem is she is starting to resemble Capps. 

This is EVENT PR vs. rational planning….Solindra anyone?

Always amusing to see the CEC backing when it was the the CEC blocking a MRF Plant (material recovery) in south county while their Board of Directors held positions operating ineffective, and costly to the taxpayers, recycling centers…(yes secretaries paid the equivalent of $35 per hour and part time directors $65K a year).

Maybe if Wolf watches the meter circle backward long enough we could subliminal “you are now a fiscal conservative.”  Probably not, but what a great thought.

» on 08.08.12 @ 01:35 PM

Although I am in the oil and gas industry, adding solar panels to homes, I believe is much better than large solar farms.  I would prefer to see the cost of panels be reduced and affordable for all without government intervention.  Of course, it still isn’t going to heat your home, but it is that much less natural gas being burned at our plants for electricity purposes.  Unfortunately, the Chinese seem to be able to make them better and with more watts than our domestic solar panel manufacturers.

» on 08.08.12 @ 03:05 PM

Coastal Local, you state your preference, ignore the taxpayer paid subsidy, and seem to completely ignore the efficiency issue.  It isn’t that the Chinese are producing any better panels they are flooding the market with government paid subsidized product.  Most of their production is inferior. 

The whole idea is what, Carbon reduction….?  Where does anyone think the parts making a panel come from and the energy to produce them?  Again….Solindra!

The taxpayer is broke.  The Feds under this Democrat Senate and President have created trillions of dollars in deficit and lives on continuing resolutions.  The State of Calif. cannot pay its billions of dollars bills because of just this type of thinking.  The County and cities subsidizes “green” and get away because it is a great “EVENT.”  The County really has been/is on the verge of serious budgeting problems and has only been saved with cuts and a small up tick. 

Companies pack-up and move elsewhere, but as long as it sounds green and is a great “EVENT,” go ahead tax more dollars.  The private sector doesn’t stand a chance with growth in government but let’s create another branch or subsidy. 

Geez.

» on 08.08.12 @ 04:15 PM

Really…did you see where I said without government intervention?  That, to me, is government subsidizing.  i would not want that.  I am talking about affordability without having to be subsidized.  The Chinese panels are not inferior.  But, they can make them without unions and environmental regulations stopping facilities being built and all the other costs and regulations forced on our US business.
You somehow misunderstood what I was saying or I did not present my ideas adequately.  I believe that if a household could afford panels, and have the disposable income to install, it would be great.  At $15K to $20K for a 1000 sq ft home it is not feasible for most households.  Like most items, hopefully, the price will drop in the future to make it affordable.

» on 08.27.12 @ 06:16 PM

Not a good idea in the city of SB.
California solar access law isn’t acknowledged or enforced in the city. The county is happy to reassess your property if you install solar panels, and the city is happy to let your neighbor’s 18’ tall hedges block sunlight from them. It’s not an economic issue - I filed complaints for 7 years prior to the moratorium on hedge height enforcement that were ignored, and my neighbors have now planted an avocado tree yo block more sunlight. The city of SB was able to afford SBPD response to a vandalism callby my neighbors when I was removing these hedges from the 6’X 70’ area of my property they occupy, but not able to enforce laws that allow solar panels to function. The CEC is aware of this policy of violation of state law - I talked to them last summer when 3KW (1/2) of my panels were shaded. They are a very bad investment in a city that doesn’t acknowledge laws protecting property rights in spite of rebates paid for by taxes. The city of Santa Barbara really only acknowledges laws that produce income for the city of Santa Barbara, and it’s unfortunately bad PR for residential solar and destructive to local solar businesses. I heard CEC’s program on KCSB re solar panels, which included solar access law, and it’s not in the interest of the public for CEC staff to fail to mention the city of SB’s with the law. The cost of litigation to residents who live in a city that ignores the law is a disincentive than greatly outweighs the value of rebates.

 

Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Your Daily Noozhawk, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.