Sunday, July 24 , 2016, 10:47 am | Fog/Mist 67º

  • Follow Noozhawk on LinkedIn
  • Follow Noozhawk on Pinterest
  • Follow Noozhawk on YouTube
 
 
 
 

Local News

County Supervisors Clear the Way for Two Proposed Mansions on Coastal Parcel

With concerns ranging from damaged wildlife habitats, drought, limited public access to the beach, and Chumash historical sites, dozens of public speakers sent a clear message Tuesday opposing two mansions proposed for a coastal parcel west of Goleta.

However, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors ultimately voted unanimously to allow the project, which sits on the eastern edge of the Gaviota Coast, to move forward, saying that the public benefit would outweigh the drawbacks.

The Paradiso del Mare project would result in two residences on 142 acres — a 6,000-square-foot home on the coastal portion of the property and a 7,000-square-foot project on the inland portion.

The property sits west of Bacara Resort & Spa, and the project was approved by the county Planning Commission but appealed by environmentalists.

The mitigation measures required to build the project included public-access easements for lateral and vertical access across the property, a parking lot for public use, 117 acres of open space, on-site habitat restoration and construction of a portion of the California Coastal Trail.

Those attempts to sweeten the deal proved to be enough for the Santa Barbara County Trails Council to withdraw its appeal.

But other groups said that those mitigation measure weren't enough, and that the county should do more review of the environmental impacts.

More than 30 people spoke during public comment, opposing the development for various reasons, and urging the supervisors to uphold the appeal.

The decision to move forward clearly troubled Third District Supervisor Doreen Farr, whose district would be home to the project.

She said that no homes in the area is the ideal, but without someone to buy the land and keep it vacant, the development would move forward.

"I don't know how to get there without a conservation buyer," she said.

Farr acknowledged that residents care deeply about the Gaviota Coast, and that she did, too.

"There's a lot of public benefit that has been offered here," she said. "The greatest challenge is getting those easements dedicated, and once you have them, you can find the money."

Appellants had raised issue with the fact that the project site was the home to the nesting site of white-tailed kites, and that the project also borders an active seal rookery. The environmental documents hadn't adequately reviewed those issues, the groups asserted.

But Farr said she felt that providing more of a setback for the trees on the property, where the kites had nested, would constrain development, and that the seals would not be affected by the homes.

"I think there has been a thorough environmental review," she said. "I think there could be some temporal loss [of access to the beach] … . It's my responsibility to try and provide access for all users."

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at [email protected]. Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

Reader Comments

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and must be free of profanity and abusive language and attacks.

By posting on Noozhawk, you:

» Agree to be respectful. Noozhawk encourages intelligent and impassioned discussion and debate, but now has a zero-tolerance policy for those who cannot express their opinions in a civil manner.

» Agree not to use Noozhawk’s forums for personal attacks. This includes any sort of personal attack — including, but not limited to, the people in our stories, the journalists who create these stories, fellow readers who comment on our stories, or anyone else in our community.

» Agree not to post on Noozhawk any comments that can be construed as libelous, defamatory, obscene, profane, vulgar, harmful, threatening, tortious, harassing, abusive, hateful, sexist, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that are invasive of another’s privacy.

» Agree not to post in a manner than emulates, purports or pretends to be someone else. Under no circumstances are readers posting to Noozhawk to knowingly use the name or identity of another person, whether that is another reader on this site, a public figure, celebrity, elected official or fictitious character. This also means readers will not knowingly give out any personal information of other members of these forums.

» Agree not to solicit others. You agree you will not use Noozhawk’s forums to solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites, without Noozhawk’s express written approval.

Noozhawk’s management and editors, in our sole discretion, retain the right to remove individual posts or to revoke the access privileges of anyone who we believe has violated any of these terms or any other term of this agreement; however, we are under no obligation to do so.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.



Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.

Sign Up Now >