Copenhagen for Dummies: What Came of the Climate Conference?

» NHBop on 03.12.10 @ 08:26 AM

Nice addition to Noozhawk BUT make sure we get both sides of the issues.

When Mary Nichols is at the conference please ask her why the California Air Resources Board chooses to ignore or not take into consideration the impact to the the California ecomony of the regtulations they are handing down.  If we allow AB32 to be totally implemented it will kill the economy.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» local on 03.12.10 @ 08:55 AM

AB32 will not kill the economy. If California takes the lead in energy independance, alternative technology then we will create many high paying jobs and improve our trade deficit. UCSB is an excellent university and particularly strong in the fields of science.

It is not all about drill baby drill. Great article and yes human caused climate change is very real. Everyone has a right to their opinion. However, in the case of climate change the only opinions of any value are the experts and the people qualified. I love it when people like Senator Imoff from Oklahoma or Glenn Beck pontifiate on this subject because they reveal just how ignorant they really are. The degree of human influence is up for an intelligent debate but the denial folks are in the same camp as the anti-evolution crowd.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» Goletaaa on 03.12.10 @ 09:24 AM

I am sickened to hear that UCSB sent 24 students to this worthless conference when the UC System is hurting for funding and raising fees by 30%...one more classic example of a broken system that needs radical overhaul!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.12.10 @ 11:26 AM

The USs brief presence at Copenhagen offered a capitalist solution of bartering buckets of acceptable pollution units. The presses clamored about the offer in aid the US agreed to if our terms were agreed to, but the people that would bear the expense did not accept a monetray solution with impending doom.

Leaders of the Developed nations cannotacknoweledge that it is precisley our economic insitutions that has brought us to this brink.

As Einstein put it best, you cannot solve a problem with the same consciousness that created it.

We are at a paradigm shift. The approach has to come from a different mind-set. A profitable solution inherently creates a social loss.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» publius on 03.12.10 @ 01:58 PM

Thanks for an informative, eye-witness article about the Copenhagen conference.

In the early ‘90s, when Newt Gingrich took over Congress, the clarion call was for “more sound-science” on key subjects, like climate, water, energy, pollution, etc.

Science research teams fanned out trying newer, better experiments, and newer,
better analysis tools, to present more reliable data sets and potential trends.

So now the National Academy, NASA’s science director, a wide range of Nobel
science laureates, and experimental physicists, chemists, climatologists, have
all submitted new reports and analysis.

But since much of the “more sound-science” continued to point to rising danger
to the earth’s atmosphere, climate, water supply and quality, the new response
from the Rove-Cheney-Bush, “intelligent design” wing of of the brutal, post-Scopes world, is that “most modern science is wrong,” and you should no longer believe it.

Right.

It rarely occurs to re-born fundamentalists, and FOX-tv minions, that they’re
being cynically jerked around as naive true-believers, by folks with a lot of bucks at stake in all this.

After the Bush Supreme Court majority ruled that Exxon, Chevron, AIG, are really “people”, who are allowed to spend as much as they want in politics,
you will see them roll out their fake, front-group think-tank shells to lobby
against sound-science, and against any agency or official who still supports it.

Energy independence gets its best bang for the buck neither from oil, coal & gas
nor from new nukes nor from new “green” energy.

Amory Lovins (among others) demonstrated pretty conclusively at the Wall St. Journal’s recent business summit at Bacara, that improved energy efficiency in buildings, systems, and transportation, provides the biggest, fastest, most sustainable return for each dollar of investment.

A side benefit is that more efficiency of homes, buildings, transport, means less
need for more (or even current) levels of energy ... which means less need for
oil, gas, and coal consumption.

But oil, gas, coal companies have Trillions of dollars at stake here. They won’t
will not cut back, voluntarily, when there are big bucks to be made.

Not to avoid climate change. Not to avoid ruining the oceans. Not to please
Republicans, Democrats, Flat Earthers, or Christ-returned-to-Earth for Easter.

They already own one national political party. They will try to spend the bucks
to own the airwaves too.

Just because the author of this article is an idealistic college student doesn’t
mean that her assessment of Copenhagen, or the issues facing California, are
wrong.

Please think carefully about what she’s said.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.12.10 @ 02:36 PM

Nikola Tesla discovered free energy more than 100 years ago. It can be distributed like your wireless connection from a tower. But free energy threatens the current monetray structure. Even at the expense of total destruction the egotistical power mongers refuse to welcome the new paradigm. Rockerfeller and Edison worked to undermine Tesla’s contribution to free society becuase of their refusal to relinquish control. You see, you can’t put a meter on free energy.

This fact is slowly trickling to the masses, but its a race against time.

This is all a grand political charade. The solutions are available, but control has to be relinquished by the Power Brokers. This mind-set has run its course. Time to welcome the New Age.

Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.12.10 @ 04:27 PM

The Darwinian theory of survival of the fittest is suitable for our current capiatlist culture. It justifies the rape of our Earth. This theory has now been proven wrong in the new paradigm. Its is flawed and self destructive. Not natural to life sustaining behavior.

Natural is survival in a social network of communities. This fundamental is evident in our cellular structure. The more sofisticated the life form, the more complicated the cellular structure, creates communities to preserve its existence.

Courage to question our cultural assumptions is the means to explore solutions in a new paradigm.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.12.10 @ 05:55 PM

TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions, I’m curious about the science behind your “free energy” claim.  Power radiated from a source such as a cell tower dissipates as the cube of distance from the tower, meaning in laymans’ terms that it falls off really fast.  The tiny amounts of power radiated from today’s cell towers already have terrorized the scientifically-challenged with visions of brain-damaged children, etc.  Bottom line, how can one reasonably expect any significant amounts of energy to be delivered via radiation?  Or do I completely misunderstand your point?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.12.10 @ 06:50 PM

there is great information in YouTube: search Nikola Tesla. Also, the HSitory Channel is making the information available. There are History Channel videos on YouTube. Search the Tesla patents, and the military Black OP projects use it.

New technology information is made available by the international pressure on the US for Disclosure. Now this goes into the ET presence on earth and the reverse engineering of down UFO crafts by the US military: technology such as fiber optics, infrared night vision, this internet and much more, too advanced for our current culture.

Technolgy has advanced exponentially since the Roswell crash. The timing is indisputable.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» AN50 on 03.12.10 @ 09:03 PM

Truthy (damn dude cut the moniker down and spare us lazy typers), there is no such thing as “free” energy. Tesla was a master at developing AC devices. His tower transmission project would have made transmission of power easy and painless for power generators. What the generators had a problem with is how you charge customers for what they use since at that time there was no way to measure air transmitted power efficiently that the generators had control of. Why on earth would anyone want to generate power (at a cost, Truthy) that anyone with a receiver could get and not have to pay for? The generators had to pay for the fuel to generate the power so they had to have a transmission system where by they controlled the flow, thus Tesla’s AC wire transmission system. There was never any “free” energy system. Most of the incredible electrical spectacles we see today were theorized, developed and made available long before your aliens crashed at Roswell. Your lack of science, history and crackpot adherence to the CT world is thus noted. Take a trank and relax. What did march technology farther and faster than anything else was NASA’s Apollo program. Fiber optics, integrated circuits and data compression techniques to name a few were responsible for the growth of our existing consumer electronics and computer technology sectors and were a result of very bright engineers using principles of Newton, Einstein, Maxwell, Faraday, Henry and yes Tesla all born before the Roswell crash and as far as we know were not space aliens. Hate to pop your CT bubble but the next time a CT asks for money you will understand why they tell you what they do. In the mean time all you big government types ought to look at NASA some time and see how they did Apollo. If you want to spend other peoples money so bad at least do it on something with some sort of credible synergistic benefit to the rest of the economy. That was Apollo and what we have done since is a crime.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.13.10 @ 09:02 AM

TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions, I hope, in your belief that the current world system is broken and will not change, that you don’t vote.  Your lack of true scientific knowlege and susceptibility to conspiracy theories is truly terrifying.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.13.10 @ 10:19 AM

Yes, I agree that seeking the truth does require a degree of courage, but for the sake of a healthy dialogue, lets look at the records that are now available via this wonderful network of data. A reliance on the mainstream media will only lead us like sheep.

I referenced a few sources. Attacking the new information doesn’t do either any good. We can start with the public press releases and debunk them. Then we can rationalize why NASA cannot produce any meaningful picture of the moon, but boast of superior technlgy that goes where no man has gone before. Then we’ll explain why the Vatican has enormius investments in space technology, and why this interest doesn’t reconcile well with the religious dogma that is preached.

Lets have fun looking at the records. Let me caution you, only the brave need apply.

Lets enjoy exploring the contradictions. Strength in numbers?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.13.10 @ 03:04 PM

AN50, don’t be so angry. Your fear only validates their belief that were not ready for the truth. They suspect that we’re not sophisticated enough for a paradigm shift.

Lets show the Media Brokers we’re ready for a Brave New World.

It can be appreciated that this attempt at dialogue does clearly illustrate how tough the nut is to crack.

Lets walk together into the New Age.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.14.10 @ 12:06 PM

My compliments to AN50 and John Locke. We’ve kept this interest, and consequently this thread going since 8am Friday.

In the event more interest is garnered to keep the dialogue fluid we can continue at visionvine.wordpress.com.

If you enjoyed the spark of interest that stimulated the right hemishere of the brain, continued practice allows more of its participation in viewing reality.
Our culture has focused on left-brain development as AN50 has strongly demostrated. The defining philospohies that structure our reality were noted.

By attempting to reconcile the contrary we’re now inviting the right brain in the dialogue.

Our culture omits this process by spoon feeding the information waiving our ability to reconcile the facts individually. He lies the Truth. We decide. The Truth remains fluid. Not is certain. This is the paradigm in the wake. The Newtonian paradigm has brought us to the forfront of the Uncertainty Priniciple. It came up short at the Quatum.

...the characters are assorted geometric shapes living in an exclusively Two-Dimensional world…the narrator, a middle-aged Square, has a disturbing dream in which he visits a One-Dimensional realm, Lineland, whose inhabitants can move only from point to point.

With mounting frustration he attempts to explain himself-that he is a Line of Lines, from a domain where you can move not only from point to point but also from side to side. The angry Linelanders are about to attack him when he awakens.

Later that same day he attempts to help his grandson, a Little Hexagon, with his studies. The grandson suggests the possibility of a Third Dimension-a realm with up and down as well as side to side. The grandfather Square proclaims this notion foolish and unimaginable.

That very night the Square has an extraordinary, life-changing encounter: a visit from an inhabitant of Spaceland, the realm of Three Dimensions.

At first the Square is merely puzzled by his visitor, a peculiar Circle who seems to change in size, even disappear. The visitor explains that he is a Sphere. He only seemed to change size and disappear because he was moving toward the Square in Space and descending at the same time.

Realizing that argument alone will not convince the Square of the Third Dimension, the exasperated Sphere creates for him an experience of Depth. The Square is badly shaken:

<em>There was a dizzy, sickening sensation of sight that was not like seeing; I saw a Line that was no Line; Space that was not Space. I was myself and not myself. When I could find voice, I shrieked aloud in agony, “Either this is madness or it is Hell.”

“It is neither,” calmly replied the voice of the Sphere. “It is Knowledge; it is Three Dimensions. Open your eyes once again and try to look steadily.

Having had an insight into another dimension, the Square becomes an evangelist, attempting to convince his fellow Flatlanders that Space is more than just a wild notion of mathematicians. Because of his insistence he is finally imprisoned, for the public good. Every year thereafter the high priest of Flatland, the Chief Circle, checks with him to see if he has regained his senses, but the stubborn Square continues to insist that there is a Third Dimension. He cannot forget it, he cannot explain it.

from the Victorian fantasy Flatland, as quoted in the Aquarian Conspiracy

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» Mark King on 03.14.10 @ 03:37 PM

I just read the first 1/3 of the comments from “TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions” and skimmed through the balance.

As poetry it could be said to have some value.  There were lyrical phrases.  There were alliterations.  There were images that generated a common personal response of “What was he/she saying there???”

But as dialogue, we all need a starting point, some influential observations and some kind of conclusion/s.

Sadly, all three (starting point, influential observations and any conclusion) were completely lacking from “TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions.”

May I suggest enrolling in a course in logical discourse and the admirable creed “brevity is the soul of wit” (a Rush Limbaugh quote, I believe).

I have no doubt that American Idol’s judge Simon Cowell would be forced to judge you “out of the competition” based on that submission.

Keep writing but to “TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions”, I ask you: hone thy pen.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.14.10 @ 05:57 PM

Fantastic.
Mark King, thanks for adding to the thread. John Locke, your continued support is appreciated. Can we hear back from A50?

You all made very impressive observations and pointed out obvious inconsitencies.

Perhap we can now construct a framework, identify the parameters, explore and most of all, find pleasure in a fruitful dialogue.

A reminder, lets try to exercise civility and not be hasteful in the insults. You’ve all demonstrated that you know everything.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.14.10 @ 09:12 PM

I’m happy to anounce that a very tall order has come in. Regrettably, too ambitous to accomplish in this medium and the limitations are too obvious to note.

Mr King suggest that the discourse start from a clearly stated starting point, then move to entertain some influential observations, and finally to a conclusion.

Mr Locke senses that there might be some intelligence, but that its buried in lots of woo-woo trippy stuff.

And AN50 feels strongly that we have not based the arguemnt on some basic fundamentals in physical science, the mysteries of nature and prefers that it fit more in a logical model.

These are all very noble requests, but there are many shortcomings posed by this medium. I might as well write a thesis, but who would want to read it? And this is not the place.

Let me remind you that this has morphed from a thread as a response to an article written by a very bright young lady.

And it is a challenge to stay the course in the blitkrieg of attacks and insults.

I would like to note that there is a similarity in the responses and I’d like to suggest that we challenge ourselves to explore more decent means to communicate.

The reccurring response pattern professes your supremecy then its followed by an attack. This response effectively kills any attempt at a dialogue. However, this is what we got to work with, and very much appreciated.

Because this is a dialogue, we would expect it to have fluidity, venture off to areas at the ends of the topic parameters, and there are no wrong answers.

Now, a framework…

Perhaps we can start from defining our existing paradigm. It is Newtonian based, space and time define our existense, and its linear. And other principles, too. Please feel free to add.

From this construct, or matrix, everything in our current paradigm is defined, from the manner that we approach medicine, to our capitalist institution…your thoughts?

Everything in the universe is assumed to be measurable to an amount certain. We have constructed an existence defined by certainty. If it can’t be measured it doesn’t exist.

Ladies and Gentlemen the floor is open…

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.15.10 @ 08:39 AM

TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions, Googling VATT indicates only that the Vatican has an observatory, as does Westmont College, nothing about any satellites. And a Google of “Vatican satellites” indicates that Vatican broadcasts use satellites, as do virtually all broadcasts other than strictly local stations. So I’ve done the searches as you requested and found no evidence to support your claim that “The Vatican owns most of the probes and satellite that monitor our space”. Please enlighten me.

I’ve also run several Googles on Nikola Tesla, who according to you “discovered free energy more than 100 years ago. It can be distributed like your wireless connection from a tower” but can find no evidence to support that claim either. And, BTW if one did try to distribute power through the air containing sufficient energy to power even one home, the level of radation at the tower would fry birds and small children.  This according to the basics of electromagnetic radiation.

Where do you get this stuff?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.15.10 @ 11:46 AM

“Truth”, you seem to ignore the fact that the sources you quoted did nothing to prove your allegations - neither about the Vatican nor about Tesla.

Anyone besides me thinking this guy is either putting us on or is seriously under the influence of pharmaceuticals, whether legal or not?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.15.10 @ 12:15 PM

TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions, you seem to miss the point that investigation of sources that YOU provided as support for your claims fail to prove or even mention your allegations.  So for you now to back away from those sources serves only to destroy what credibilty you may have had (with someone, not with me).

Buh-Bye, now.  Enjoy your world, whatever world that may be…

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.15.10 @ 01:37 PM

So let me get this straight, Truth. Having quoted sources that do not demonstrate what you said they would, you now admit that there is no proof for anything you say, yet you expect otherwise logical and rational people to believe you?

You are one seriously disturbed individual and badly in need of help.  Do yourself a favor and get it.

We control the vertical.  We control the horizontal.  You have now entered The Outer Limits.  Be afraid.  Be very afraid.  The all-powerful government military is at this very moment tracing you through Noozhawk’s website and pyramidic crystals and will shortly be at your door to take you away…

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.15.10 @ 04:44 PM

yep, fiction is fiction, as in a novella, while truth is truth.  And verifiable.  You should learn the difference.  Good night and good luck.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» AN50 on 03.16.10 @ 09:16 AM

Jeeze I never thought having a liberal respond would be so gratifying! Thanks, Local. To answer your response, I don’t want people to think that because I come down hard on the AGW religion that I don’t believe in human contribution. I do. I just don’t see the evidence to support it being a major cause of warming nor do I believe any evidence has been produced so far to support we can do anything to stop GW. So yes I put a much higher priority on adaptation. As for energy independence I am with you. But I temper my enthusiasm for our ability to do things with reality. The reality is for us to produce “clean energy” in an abundance that does not cripple our way of life we need to burn dirty fuels first and a lot of them. Local, I am not being facetious here. Our abundant NG and coal are essentially gold to our economy. Without exploiting these two resources we will never produce the wealth and capital needed to either sustain us or produce the next energy paradigm, whether nuclear, geothermal or any of the other green supplies.

That means we have got to shake the damned GW science community away from the damned global socialists and have them start thinking like scientist again instead of social engineers trying to retool human behavior. That ain’t gonna work and yes it has been tried and failed by every civilization known to man. So the answer is leave the damned climate alone it will do what it is going to do and you cannot stop it and your affect will be inconsequential. Figure out how to adapt (we are very good at that as a species), next drill baby drill, dig baby dig and burn those fossil fuels like there ain’t no tomorrow. This will bring much needed relief from our imposing trade deficit. If we can earn enough capital we can exploit other sources as well and strive not just for independence but as a net supplier. Now we are making real money, money that can pay for less viable but cleaner sources like geothermal, solar PV and nuclear. In the time the IPCC was to mandate a reduction of CO2 to 1994 levels we will have made enough money to tool up the next paradigm in energy supply and distribution. Yes , Local we will have dumped a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere but nowhere near what has been the historical norm for CO2. Yes we will grow warmer and sea levels will rise and the climate will be different and if we are really lucky we might even prolong the warming period so we avoid turning Canada, Russia and northern Europe into an ice shield. Hell they may even become the world’s bread basket, how about that for a positive spin on GW? Point is we need to stop this infantile whining about “dirty man” fouling the earth up and start working our survival and progress. Going back to the Stone Age is not an option.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» Mark King on 03.16.10 @ 02:42 PM

To “AN50’s” last remarks to “local” I have only one word to add:

AMEN

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Locke on 03.16.10 @ 06:44 PM

Allow me to introduce a comment.  “local”, while I’ll allow that you have seen “massive amounts” of data supporting the theory of climate change (what is “massive” after all), I will ask that you allow me the observation that a substantial and growing number of scientists are now questioning whether climate change is manmade.  But I also believe that debating whether climate change is man made is a complete waste of time and energy.  I believe we should focus on energy conservation, pollution control, preservation of the rain forests, and, most important of all, population control, all of which will help mitigate climate change, if it is real, but are beneficial even if climate change is not real.  Let’s focus on actions of clear benefit; forget the academic, and questionable, conceptual arguments.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» Disturber on 03.17.10 @ 07:51 AM

Let’s not forget that brave interview Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had with Nathan Thurm.

The two thousand top scientists from 100 nations around the world, have now declared the international concensus that global warming exists, that we are causing it,and that the impacts are going to be catastrophic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLBQxk72NY&feature=player_embedded

…The east Antarctic ice sheet, and the Greenland ice sheet may break off…if that happens Manhattan Island would be under 12 feet of water.

…listen…I like Manhatten…but it’s filthy. It’s a filthy City, I don’t think you can deny that.  There’s a rat problem.  The theater scene in Manhatten is far from superb. Musicals?  Most men don’t like musicals…”

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» Disturber on 03.17.10 @ 10:04 AM

...And if I’m not mistaken, didn’t Phil Jones himself admit that There has been no global warming since 1995

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html#ixzz0iSRowbtp

“...Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.”

Which is interesting because didn’t Peter the sixth grader arrive at a similar conclusion?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/09/picking-out-the-uhi-in-global-temperature-records-so-easy-a-6th-grader-can-do-it/

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» AN50 on 03.17.10 @ 03:34 PM

Local, I appreciate what your saying but I don’t pick fossil fuel consumption for energy because I want to. I would much prefer your nimrod, lunatic, anti nuke nuts had not put us way behind the damned French in nuke energy production, so that we would have maybe 80% of our base load electrical production on nukes rather than fossils, but I didn’t kill the nukes, you folks did and still want to!!! That would have put a huge relief on our foreign imports of oil and helped us preserve our fossil supplies for using as carbon feedstock into the chemical and plastic industries. But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, you guys blew that one! No we need to drill and dig and burn fossil fuels because WE ARE FRIGGEN BROKE!!!!! And we are broke because of a lot of other things too but mostly because we spend more than we earn and we can’t earn because, yes Local, it’s your damned side again who have made earning wealth in this country a freaking taboo. And no I’m not talking about personal wealth or your favorite, Keynesian wealth (speculative), but real wealth like extraction of natural resources, manufacturing and agriculture. We can’t afford your damned useless over priced green tech energy crap because we have NO MONEY. That’s why we now have to deplete our carbon stocks, Local, and dump CO2, because liberal policies which kill wealth generation and promote dependency have rendered us impotent.
Look, in all fairness my liberal friend, the right is no better in its management of our future. Shortsightedness, selfishness, lack of leadership vision and too fierce a streak of go-it-alone have crippled the right as much as the left has blown off both feet with smothering good intentions. But clearly we need to look past all that crap and pick what works and damned quick because the clock is ticking and we are running out of time and I don’t mean with climate change my friend. If we don’t get our selves out of this self loathing nanny state minded bipolarization and fix the underpinning of our battered economy we won’t be around to witness any climate change. First things first Local. When we are making wealth again we can try more of your stuff again but maybe we do it like Europe and not shoot our foot off in the process, eh? Just like old grandpa used to say “you can have it when you earn enough to pay for it”, works for AGW and your healthcare too!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» TheTruthLiesInTheContradictions on 03.18.10 @ 04:26 PM

Interesting to note that the prior paradigm shift has been called to attention a few times in this thread: Copernicus – credited for the prior paradigm shift, from us being the center of the universe to being participants in it.

Here neither camp can convince the other that their authoritative source is supreme. Both camps are suspect of each other.

The Left doesn’t have confidence in sources, such as the Heritage Foundation, and rightfully so. They are highly politicized and their agenda is suspect.

The Right is steadfast behind their source. Their discipline is unwavering in refusal to consider any other source outside their set of authoritative bodies.

Conventionally, it is accepted that NASA is not politicized. Perhaps, more so than the Heritage Foundation. They’re just much better at keeping it secret.

The most significant endeavor of our human history, walking on the moon, this historic footage has been lost. And no one seems to see the significance of this omission. There is now compelling testimony and evidence that recorded on that film was ancient lunar ruins.

The Climategate stunner is of particular interest. NASA reports that NASA data was poor, so they used CRU data instead. Here the public was not afforded the opportunity to determine for themselves the validity of the poor findings.

Then, the data from HADCRU3 climate dataset had been destroyed, and again it was determined that the data loss was not important.

It seems that NASA has been added, again.

Could NASA be hiding the fact that the 10th Planet is approaching our solar system and causing global warming. Notable changes in the atmosphere of Neptune and Uranus have been reported, and the ice caps of the Martian planet are also melting.

There’s an alternate plan for survival and you’re not included.

Planet X and the Mysterious Death of Dr. Robert Harrington

YOWUSA.COM, 22-May-2008
John DiNardo
Janice Manning

Dr. Robert S. Harrington, the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, died before he could publicize the fact that Planet X is approaching our Solar System.

Many feel his death part of a cove-up? One in which government agencies quickly moved to conceal the most earth-shaking discovery in history. If so, the search for truth begins in New Zealand.

In 1991, Dr. Robert S. Harrington, the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, took a puny 8-inch telescope to Black Birch, New Zealand, one of the few viewing points on Earth optimal for sighting Planet X, which he definitively calculated to be approaching from below the ecliptic at an angle of 40 degrees.

Also known as Nibiru in the Summerian texts.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.