Harris Sherline: Is Our Homeland Secure?

We all need to be prepared to take care of ourselves in the event of an attack or disaster

By | Published on 02.20.2010

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Share

For the most part, I have always been an optimist, generally seeing opportunity in difficult situations. But I must admit that when it comes to homeland security, I tend to be somewhat pessimistic. When I do think about it, I invariably ask myself the following questions: Are we secure? Has our government done enough to make the American homeland safe? Are we doing enough ourselves, as individuals? Is it even possible to make us secure?

Harris Sherline
Harris Sherline

The Christmas Day attempted bombing of Northwest Airlines Flight 253 en route to Detroit from Amsterdam raises serious questions about just how secure we are. In my judgment, we are definitely not secure.

Not only are we not secure, but it appears that the system that is intended to protect us is broken. Consider the response of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, when asked about the incident: “Do you feel that we are? Does anyone you know really feel the nation is safe from another attack? I don’t know anyone who does when you put the question to them.”

The Bush administration took credit for the fact that we didn’t suffer another major terrorist attack since Sept. 11, 2001, which makes me wonder what the reaction of the American people will be when it happens again. And it will happen.

The reaction may well be to “throw the bums out.” At this point, it would be the Obama administration at fault. Unfortunately, that probably wouldn’t make much difference.

Every time I hear Napolitano talk about what the government has done or is doing to protect America, I wonder how anyone can actually believe we are adequately protected when we are so plagued by political correctness that it prevents us from even doing something as basic as profiling airline passengers. For eight years after 9/11, we are still not inspecting most of the cargo on airplanes and at our ports, or adequately protecting our water and food supplies, power plants, etc. What about the potential of suicide bombers attacking in such public places as shopping malls? If anything would disrupt our way of life, that certainly would.

Our leaders responded to 9/11 by creating the largest bureaucracy in U.S. history — the Homeland Security Department, with a $55.1 billion budget and more than 200,000 employees.

Just looking at the organization chart is enough to boggle the mind. There are 22 departments organized in five levels of bureaucracy. The major agencies are the Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Secret Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the U.S. Coast Guard.

They all report to the secretary of Homeland Security, along with 18 other assorted “secretaries,” officers, directors and the like. There is also a Homeland Security Advisory Council, which provides “advice and makes recommendations to the secretary of Homeland Security.”

It looks like an organizational nightmare, with a span of control that exceeds the ability of any single individual to manage. Just looking at it raises questions. And, as usual, Congress has a hand in managing everything, adding to the complexity and confusion that surrounds the agency’s activities. Furthermore, Napolitano has no training or experience in the field.

We are a long way from being secure. I also believe we can never be completely safe. How on Earth is it possible for us to protect ourselves from every conceivable attempt to attack us, ranging from nuclear to the poisoning of our food and/or water, to attacking our transportation systems, power grids, other major installations and Lord knows what else?

Furthermore, without adequate border security, there can be no homeland security. Listening to the endless arguments about securing our borders, especially with Mexico, it’s obvious that we’re wide open to being infiltrated by our enemies.

Apart from 9/11, the breathtaking scope of Hurricane Katrina underscored the fact that the most important function of government is to protect its citizens.

For the most part, the Homeland Security Department is a top-down structure, with the agencies that make up the department funding a wide variety of programs, including emergency preparedness activities at the state and county levels. However, are we really prepared for major emergencies, such as fires, torrential storms, accidents involving hazardous materials, earthquakes or other natural disasters — in addition to the unthinkable, a terrorist attack or perhaps the overflow consequences of one in a major metropolitan area?

When there is a fire, earthquake, tornado or flood, who’s available to help? We tend to rely on local fire, police or sheriff’s departments, public utilities, agencies such as the American Red Cross, or the National Guard. But what if no one can get to you for two or three days, or a week? What can you do? Are you adequately prepared to tough it out on your own? New Orleans vividly demonstrated that most people are not.

In a major crisis, the reality is that you will probably have to fend for yourself until help arrives — conceivably days, a week or longer. There are simply not enough police, firefighters and emergency personnel to respond to every situation.

Think about how unprepared you may be for an emergency — including everything from fire extinguishers to first-aid kits and CPR training to an adequate supply of food and water to a pre-determined survival plan and escape route for your family, to just plain knowing what to do to protect your home and loved ones and to help your neighbors.

Columnist Thomas Sowell made the following observations in an article about New Orleans and Katrina:

“When all is said and done, government is ultimately just human beings — politicians, judges, bureaucrats. Maybe the reason we are so often disappointed with them is that they have overpromised and we have been gullible enough to believe them.

“Government cannot solve all our problems, even in normal times, much less during a catastrophe of nature that reminds man how little he is, despite all his big talk.

“The most basic function of government, maintaining law and order, breaks down when floods or blackouts paralyze the system.

“During good times or bad, the police cannot police everybody. They can at best control a small segment of society. The vast majority of people have to control themselves.”

If we don’t know what to do in a major emergency, and we expect our local police and firefighters to be the “first responders,” and they are not available, who will be accountable? The Homeland Security Department, state or county government, or a city council? As we have seen with Hurricane Katrina, there will be plenty of blame to go around.

In the final analysis, self-help is inescapable. Think about it. Are you prepared? Do you know what to do if outside help can’t get to you when the next major emergency strikes?

There is another major emergency in your future, and the likelihood that the government — local, state or federal — will be able prevent it or provide 100 percent protection is slim to none. We all need to be prepared to take care of ourselves and to help our neighbors until the situation stabilizes.

— Harris R. Sherline is a retired CPA and former chairman and CEO of Santa Ynez Valley Hospital who has lived in Santa Barbara County for more than 30 years. He stays active writing opinion columns and his blog, Opinionfest.com.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 02.21.10 @ 12:24 AM

February 19, 2010
by Erick Stakelbeck

CBN News has learned exclusively that five Muslim soldiers at Fort Jackson in South Carolina were arrested just before Christmas. It is unclear whether the men are still in custody. The five were part of the Arabic Translation program at the base.
Patrick Jones, the Deputy Public Affairs Officer for Fort Jackson, confirmed for CBN News Thursday afternoon that an investigation was ongoing.

Prior to this posting, CBN News learned that these details were also confirmed by a government official with knowledge of the investigation.

The men are suspected of trying to poison the food supply at Fort Jackson.

A source with intimate knowledge of the investigation, which is ongoing, told CBN News investigators suspect the “Fort Jackson Five” may have been in contact with the group of five Washington, D.C., area Muslims that traveled to Pakistan to wage jihad against U.S. troops in December. That group was arrested by Pakistani authorities, also just before Christmas.

Coming as it does on the heels of November’s Fort Hood jihadist massacre, this news could have major implications.

SOURCE: http://www.actforamerica.org/index.php/home/10-newsmaster/1829-update-five-muslim-soldiers-arrested-at-fort-jackson-in-south-carolina

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.22.10 @ 10:19 AM

The Bush administration was sleeping on the job and let 9/11 happen… there was a wealth of prior information, including an FBI agent or two who figured it out.  Odd that Harris Sherline fails to mention that.

The underpants/jockstrap bomber on Christmas day 2009 doesn’t scare me.

That we are giving $billions to Pakistan, which is partially run by Islamic nuts and which has nuclear bombs, scares me .

I’m much, much more scared at the drug wars that are raging out of control in Mexico, just over our border, and sometimes leaking into our Country.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.22.10 @ 12:42 PM

Yep small P I agree. Only difference is you still follow a suicidal ideology along with our president. That scares me more than anything else. I mean what’s worse, an Islamic nut who will die for his warped interpretation of his religion or some liberal who will let you die for their warped sense of guilt?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Harris Sherline: Obama Administration’s Contempt for Law at Core of Energy Policy

White House's worst offense has been to ignore a ruling denouncing the restriction on offshore drilling

Harris Sherline: Asset Forfeiture Laws Amount to Legal Theft

Forfeitures should be treated as cost recovery for law enforcement agencies, not as a revenue source

Harris Sherline: Outsourcing Is Simply a Part of Doing Business

In the long run it's a good thing in our ever-changing world

Harris Sherline: Let’s Hear It for the Good Kids

Meeting with Santa Ynez Valley Union High School students restores faith and respect in today's youth

Harris Sherline: Zealots Take Beliefs to Ill-Guided Extremes

Violent fanatics are nothing more than spoiled brats who use their particular cause as the rationale for temper tantrums

Weather: Fair 53.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive