- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Harris Sherline: We Have Met the Enemy, and It Is Us
One of the most valuable lessons about negotiating that I learned in more than 50 years as an accounting professional and businessman was to always leave something for the other side. Successful negotiating is not about winning everything and leaving nothing for the other party. That’s one of the biggest mistaken assumptions made by many people and can sometimes lead to undesirable and unintended consequences.
Negotiating is not dictating. It’s a give-and-take process that, hopefully, can be a win-win for both parties. Otherwise, it becomes an exercise in power, where one side simply dictates to the other.
That said, the example of the day is the unions that represent government employees vs. the government entities that employ them and indirectly the taxpayers who ultimately pay the bill. Think about it: What is the long-term outcome likely to be when unions obtain wages and benefits from the government that can’t be sustained over time?
Pogo’s well-known quote comes to mind: “We have met the enemy and he is us.” That seems to be the case with government employee unions, which have negotiated wage and benefit packages that are generally better than those of most taxpayers forced to pay the bill.
The argument is sometimes made that government employees are also taxpayers. True enough. However, that would be appropriate only if they were paying the major share of the bill for their own compensation.
The problem has been a combination of government revenue streams that grew steadily for many years, coupled with compliant politicians who responded to the political muscle of the unions that have actively supported their campaigns for election. A particularly egregious example of this was the Santa Barbara City Council election a few years ago, in which the employees union asked council candidates a series of questions but would not release their responses to the public.
Not only do the government employee unions have the power to strike, they also vote and, given the percentage of the work force that now works for government, they represent a major portion of the voting population.
We — that is, our political leaders — can resist, but they don’t. President Ronald Reagan demonstrated the value of pushing back against the excessive demands of government employees by firing more than 11,000 air traffic controllers in 1981, when they attempted what was then an illegal strike.
The result has been the steady growth of government employee costs, to the point that they can no longer be sustained. This is clearly demonstrated by the current plight of Santa Barbara County, which is grappling with a projected budget deficit of about $39 million.
The percentage of government budgets that is allocated to employee retirement has been steadily increasing. At some point, the government entities that fail to stop approving expenditures they don’t have the money to pay will eventually go broke. When that happens, whatever retirement benefits they may be contractually bound to pay to their employees will be drastically reduced, of necessity, possibly by a bankruptcy court, if no other way.
But, both the unions and the various government entities seem to keep trying to “soldier on” as if there’s no tomorrow. One gets the impression that if no one looks, the problem will just go away. It won’t. There will be a day of reckoning, and appears to be approaching fast.
Writing in the Santa Maria Times, Julian Ramos noted on March 3: “Faced with the unenviable task of closing an overall $40 million budget gap, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors agreed Tuesday to hold off giving direction to county staff on how to narrow that deficit. ... Most of the budget gap is linked to skyrocketing county employee retirement costs and shrinking property tax revenues, which makes up the majority of the board’s discretionary funding and supports most public-safety programs.”
Fifth District Supervisor Joe Centeno of Santa Maria said he would rather see cuts to nonessential services than see reductions in services to children and adults who need mental-health care. “We have to find a way to accommodate their needs,” he said.
It all sounds good, but no one has the slightest idea how to stretch the available funds to accomplish that without going broke in the process. Ultimately, Santa Barbara County won’t be able to meet its commitments to pay the retirement benefits the unions have negotiated for their members. The county will be forced to default, and the unions will have turned out to be their own worst enemy.
It’s time people in government — at every level — get real.
— Harris R. Sherline is a retired CPA and former chairman and CEO of Santa Ynez Valley Hospital who has lived in Santa Barbara County for more than 30 years. He stays active writing opinion columns and his blog, Opinionfest.com.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 03.15.10 @ 12:32 PM
Well, yes, but ...
County CEO Mike Brown, and County Auditor Bob Geiss, have been warning about this risk for many years now, to Supervisors majorities from both parties, to no avail.
For over thirty years now, the ability of all CA cities and counties to balance their revenue and expenses locally has been co-opted by the corrupt reach of Sacramento.
When Prop 13 permanently transferred most school funding and local control of property taxes to formulae imposed by the always-broke State government, it
almost assured perpetual, local financial planning difficulties.
Also, whenever cash is short (which is often), the State just swoops down on
counties and schools, and makes up their own deficit “off the top” of local
agencies, then tells them to just “deal with it”, which is what’s going on right
now.
The Ronald Reagan Mr. Sherline idealizes was a popular pragmatist, not a steely
ideologue.
When he needed move revenue as governor, he raised taxes to get it.
Today, it would be the political “death penalty” for any Republican to suggest
doing what Reagan did, no matter how dire the circumstances.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Harris Sherline: Obama Administration’s Contempt for Law at Core of Energy Policy
White House's worst offense has been to ignore a ruling denouncing the restriction on offshore drilling
Harris Sherline: Asset Forfeiture Laws Amount to Legal Theft
Forfeitures should be treated as cost recovery for law enforcement agencies, not as a revenue source
Harris Sherline: Outsourcing Is Simply a Part of Doing Business
In the long run it's a good thing in our ever-changing world
Harris Sherline: Let’s Hear It for the Good Kids
Meeting with Santa Ynez Valley Union High School students restores faith and respect in today's youth
Harris Sherline: Zealots Take Beliefs to Ill-Guided Extremes
Violent fanatics are nothing more than spoiled brats who use their particular cause as the rationale for temper tantrums
Weather: Fair 44.0º
Search Noozhawk »
