Kids Speaking Up: Lost Language

» Justmythoughts on 02.26.09 @ 03:35 AM

YGG

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» Connie Phung on 02.26.09 @ 06:41 PM

William:
I understand the view from which you are stating your commentary.  However, it is not that I disagree that the English language has not evolved.  In fact, to this very day, it is changing dramatically.  But what I am trying to express are concerns that our daily conversations have declined in meaning due to the lack of esteem for the English Language.  For instance, in texts, articles, verb tensing, and proper grammar have frequently been eliminated in order to reply faster.  This has resulted in the decreasing regard we have towards the utilization of proper English in the real world.  Secondly, while I agree that the availability of these electronics allows us to receive more information quickly, not all focus on the extreme issues we face today.  Instead, some may use it to peer nosily into the lives of others.
As to your “printing press” argument.  Voltaire was a published philosophical thinker, writer, and social reformist.  Voltaire was able to spread his opinions with the printing press; he was able to discuss radical thoughts and ideas, thus resulting in the Enlightenment of the 18th century.  This method of expression is still available and still efficient today.  What I’m trying to say is that this is difficult to accomplish through the impromptu and informal texting that has taken our generation by storm.
I thank you for your opinion.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» John Demonteverde on 02.28.09 @ 06:25 PM

Candide’s Attack on reason is that questioned. Leibnitz, Pagloss were all satirically rhetorical. That is what I remember from Cleveland Humanities Magnet High School Core Classes. I forgot if it was the 10th or 11th grade with Sisson, Miller, Hill or Lynn; all my teachers still held me back in memories all together. If any can get the point then answers now, people better to have answers for speaking true types of nonsense.

Attack this one: think and read, have answers. This has three parts but two things to do. The answers are two things, reading and thinking is what is done to have answers. This sense of being reasonable conveys a way of learning for others by not asking why as to being ignorant – start learning if none is known. Knowing what is to be talked about can explain any reasons one teacher will say.

After getting these points, think further. Thought the likes of Hemingway where the Lost Generation wrote ideas Mr. Chen “doth sayeth” he disagrees these ideas from pointing to agree – lol. Wittgenstein was a contemporary of said journalist writing in a medium similar to Ms. Phung’s text messaging style – similar if not started by American Transcendentalists – for popularly being recognized “by” also. Authors like Clemens, Thoreau, and Emerson did influence Faulkner who did make a significant impact to the generation who fought during the First World War.

Hemingway is influential to Post Modern authors who styled dystopia while Wittgenstein was invited by Bertrand Russell at Cambridge explaining new symbolic mathematical analysis of human semantics. Therefore Reading and Math are keys to better comprehension and analysis for other facets of humanity; including history; our nonsensical law; and which are all that said are the other types of sciences.

By never stopping to learn and not quitting explaining the real points will make teachers out of any; so reread the whole thing again. To end all discussions:

(1) Quad erat demonstradum – that which is to be shown – qed.

(2) Reductio ad absurdum – reducing from the absurd – raa.

Now may everyone know to be the same argument; argumentum ad homoneim – aah.

People often referred to all men from ancient times including women that everything is just integral – interconnected descriptions by the existence of limits. For every answer greater than or equal to a question, there exists an answer such that for every answer by being doubted, the question has been answered. Semantics of interpretations solves the same solution, preference is the expression to communicate.

Both Ms. Phung and Mr. Chen have the same solutions in different interpretation for communication. AHH-MEN from the Latin of which is so be it (the real absurd solution).

Education is the Law - qed.

[Note to Editor: I am still getting the message “you are not authorized” and will not bother to ask the website admin to change the nested value from (-1) back to (1) on the java scripts. I do not need to explain myself. My IP address is 66.98.152.69 so as to any reasons why this post will also be taken out; I leave any their doubts by not asking me, I am a teacher better written and having not said to understand the other.]

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» William on 03.04.09 @ 03:39 AM

John:

What are you trying to say? What is your main point?

Thank you.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.