California’s Budget Debacle Grows Into Worst-Case Scenarios

What can we expect and what will we do if the state budget impasse deteriorates further?

For Santa Barbara County Auditor-Controller Bob Geis, it's the waiting to see if Sacramento will produce a budget that's the aggravating part.
For Santa Barbara County Auditor-Controller Bob Geis, it’s the waiting to see if Sacramento will produce a budget that’s the aggravating part. “How much the county can hold depends on how much the state stiffs us for,” he said. “It’s a moving target.” (Lara Cooper / Noozhawk photo)

By | Published on 02.11.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Post | View Comments (10)
  • Share
 

In the face of California’s projected $42 billion budget shortfall and after a protracted impasse, it looks as if there is now the outline of a plan to wipe out the deficit. The Legislature could vote as early as Friday on the proposal, although it was not clear Wednesday night whether the required two-thirds of legislators will support it.

As of Wednesday afternoon, the new fiscal framework includes $15 billion in spending cuts, $14 billion in new and increased taxes, and $12 billion in short-term loans and borrowing against future California Lottery monies. The deal between Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders incorporates deep spending cuts: $323 million from community colleges, almost $8 billion from public schools, and furloughs for state workers, just to name a few. To raise revenue, the state sales tax would increase by 1.5 percent to 8.75 percent for the next three years, vehicle registration fees would almost double, and other taxes would be imposed.

Regardless of the outcome in Sacramento, local agencies and municipalities are bracing for a massive cash crunch.

Already the state controller has had to issue IOUs or delay payments to certain agencies as the Golden State tries to work out a strategy to get out of its hole. Tax refund checks, social services payments, funds to counties and reimbursements to state vendors will all come late.

As personal income tax revenue — a major source of income for the state — dried up, so did funds from the federal bond markets. As a result, infrastructure projects lost their funding, leading to more job losses.

So with California’s cash flow still looking like it’s going to dry up in March, as many have predicted, how would that development affect our community? We made some calls, poked around, asked some questions, and what we found out follows below. What we’re really interested in, however, is to hear from you. What concerns do you have? What programs are your priorities? How can we help you find out the information you need? Please e-mail your questions to news@noozhawk.com with a “California budget” subject line.

Santa Barbara County

According to a staff report last week, Santa Barbara County is facing an $8.9 million shortfall by the end of the fiscal year, which ends June 30. Much of that is money owed to the Fire Department for services performed and overtime accrued during the Gap and Tea fires. The county anticipates the payments will come through. Another reason is the decline in anticipated revenue like sales and bed taxes.

According to budget expert Jason Stillwell, the demand for county social services has increased because of the recession, the same kind of services for which the state is considering cuts or delays in funding.

The gas tax, which funds road projects, and other transportation monies may be held up as well. State grants that go to the Sheriff’s Department look like they might get the ax, including funds that would go to juvenile probation, a program that has already had its budget stretched thin.

Meanwhile, Proposition 63 funds, which are desginated for mental health services, are being considered for IOUs from the state, a move that would aggravate an ongoing shortfall in the county Department of Alcohol, Drug & Mental Health Services. According to county Auditor-Controller Bob Geis, the county has had to deal with delays in Medicare payments for years. The money has been coming out of the county’s strategic reserves.

“So today, if I look at my mental health fund, I’m short $16 million, Geis said.

Among the options he might consider are establishing loans between funds, a tactic the state Constitution allows for certain periods of time — in this case, up to the last Monday in April. If things continue to dry up, the Board of Supervisors may have to step in to create loans between funds over which they have some discretion.

The county Treasurer’s investment pool might become another source, depending on how dire things get, but the county would have to tread carefully there. Much of the funds in that pool go to things like schools and special districts. Next in line would be emergency borrowings, and, like what the state is doing, IOUs.

“We might issue IOUs to vendors, maybe to the retirement fund, or even employees,” Geis said. “But I doubt that we’d even get to that stage.”

It’s hard to tell exactly how long the county can hold out.

“How much the county can hold depends on how much the state stiffs us for,” Geis said. “It’s a moving target.”

Social Services

The county Department of Social Services is already taking hits to its budget, said director Kathy Gallagher.

“We have a very large department; we run a lot of programs,” she said.

Most of the programs are geared toward the lower-income population, she said, including cash assistance, food stamps, and Medi-Cal, foster care and child abuse services — all of which are going to suffer the effects of the state shortfall.

The only program that won’t be hit will be the in-home care program that provides services to seniors and the disabled.

“We have enough cash on hand to continue paying until the middle of March,” Gallagher said. At that point, the supervisors may have to step in with reserve money, or decide to stop making the payments.

For Gallagher, as it is for many agencies waiting on the state budget, one of the biggest factors is lack of information. Without a budget, she said, it’s hard to tell which programs will get cut, which might squeak by and which will disappear altogether.

Santa Barbara and Goleta

The cities are in relatively better shape than the county, with its heavier reliance on state funds. Still, delayed disbursements of gas tax money could have its negative effects, said Santa Barbara City Administrator Jim Armstrong.

“Those delays could lead to delays in our capital projects,” Armstrong said.

“It already has impacted some of the bond programs,” said Goleta City Manager Dan Singer, who also pointed to street funds and community policing funds as two of the revenue sources that are slowing down.

Both Goleta and Santa Barbara officials are crossing their fingers that California won’t take the sales taxes due to the cities; so far they’re doubtful that the state will. Things should hold steady, at least in the short term, they say.

“We’ll be OK for another two months,” Armstrong said. “Any longer than that and it’s going to be a problem.”

Parks

County parks director Daniel Hernandez said his department has had to get creative to sustain the level of service residents expect. With 25 county parks and open spaces to look after, it’s no small task on a tight budget. Tasks like picking up trash, weed abatement, rodent control and helping maintain the areas around county buildings are just a few items that Hernandez says he’s fighting to keep covered.

“For now, we’re just trying to figure out how to do those things with less,” he said, adding that parks are important in the larger budgetary scheme.

“We get over 3 million visitors to our parks and if you figure that each person spends twenty dollars in hotels or gasoline, that’s a huge asset to the county,” Hernandez said.

Several bond measures like Propositions 12 and 40 that would issue out-of-state monies to parks departments. Because only four of Santa Barbara County’s parks offset the cost of operating them completely, fee creation has become a bigger part of the department’s cash flow. A little bit of foresight has kept the department going during the budget crisis.

“We’re not in that great shape, but we have a pretty forward thinking department,” Hernandez said.  “Last year, we started thinking ahead and knew that this might happen.”

Education

Wendy Shelton, communications director at the Santa Barbara County Education Office, said this kind of budget crisis is unprecedented in her two decades of work with the county.

“Nobody I know professionally has ever seen anything like this,” she said. “Everybody cut to the bone long ago and now they’re into muscle and there is nothing left.”

Each of the 22 independent school districts that the county education office services is diverse with different needs. Shelton said the districts are preparing for the worst, but will not make any drastic moves, like increasing class sizes or shortening the school year, until the budget has been passed. Educators are also waiting to see whether the federal stimulus bill, which has large sums earmarked for education, can be reconciled and approved in Congress. Until then, everyone is being very cautious and very prudent, she said.

Although laying off staff would be the largest way to cut back on costs, the budget could be passed midway through the school year, when teachers are still covered by their contracts. The timing makes things more than inconvenient for educators.

“That’s devastating to a school because you’re already locked into your expenditures,” she said. “Schools take what they’re given and make due. There’s no mechanism for them to make money, so they truly are victim to these kinds of financial crises.”

Transportation

With the state’s credit in disrepair, investors are leery of buying bonds, which freeze projects they support. Throughout California, nearly 6,000 projects formerly funded by state bonds have been suspended. But Santa Barbara County has somewhat of a safety net in play in Measure D, the sales tax that will allocate $1 billion toward transportation over the next 30 years. Because Sacramento is mostly out of the picture, projects can continue, regardless of state funding. The Highway 101 project is the only local transportation project currently receiving such bond funding.

“We’re lucky that the bulk of our work is still continuing,” said Gregg Hart, spokesman for the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments. Because of the availability of local funds to continue projects, he said, “the state is treating us differently.”

Hart said SBCAG will be meeting Feb. 19 to discuss putting Measure D funds toward the Highway 101 project. In addition, road maintenance, surface treatments, sidewalk upkeep and traffic signals are funded by gas taxes, which remain stable as long as people keep buying fuel, Hart said. Even though the county’s transportation projects will likely power through the budget crisis, he acknowledged the magnitude of the situation.

“It’s not the first time it’s happened, but this is pretty unprecedented,” he said.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and staff writer Sonia Fernandez at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 02.12.09 @ 05:48 AM

The liberals want to control us by the constant tax increases—Wake up—-30% in staff and wages need to be cut in government..No one will quit, because that wage is still better than the private sector job. Yes the ones that pay them…

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.12.09 @ 06:17 AM

These sound like short term solutions. What happens when the unions start demanding pay increases to compensate for all these higher fees and taxes? Government wages and personnel numbers have inflated along with our inflated economy. Service programs have been created to deal with the huge influx of low paid workers. The bubble economy afforded these expenditures. Do we want another bubble economy? Government spending was unsupportable even in the best of times. Wages, personnel, and programs must be reduced. Allowing unionized government workers puts into question who is running our State - them or the people.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.12.09 @ 06:58 AM

Services to people with developmental disabilities are facing major cuts or “discounts” in payment rates as well. These discounts vary in amount, but are basically accross the board except for employment services for people with DD which already took a 10% cut last year. Another way the state is dealing with this problem is that they have halted their budget projections for increasing the amount of people served. So in other words over the course of the next year people will be added to the system, but revenue will not increase to along side. What this means is that while the same servies must be provided we will be receiving less money. We face staff cuts, larger case loads, increased client to staff ratios, etc. Basically, less effective service for the people who really need it.

There has to be an increase in state revenue and more reliable sources need to be established.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.12.09 @ 07:54 AM

Yes times are tough, perhaps we can look into the true cost of cheap labor and factor the amount of lost tax revenue of under the table workers in construction and agriculture.  We all drive the same roads, are we all paying our fair share?

I don’t want to go Lou Dobbs on the problem but when the economy is more forgiving there is less rush to find out who is paying in and who isn’t.  If the state needs more money from my wages, I would like to see a more even spread of the responsibility.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.12.09 @ 08:55 AM

Unions should not be allowed in Government—-They are already Civil servants of the people..

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.12.09 @ 10:17 AM

What is the problem, we need to take care of our own familiy members…Not Social services..

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.12.09 @ 11:06 AM

I now work in the private sector but previously was in the public sector… It was a joke…

I had to get out to keep my sanity… I had a masters and what work did they have for me (for months on end).. I was the official Filer and organizer… There was so little of work I did that by the end I had it down to finishing my work in about an hour every day. There was no chance to excel, life was monotonous.

Now from the private sector I enjoy the work I do, am rewarded for being smarter than the average bear… And do more than memorize the entire wikipedia library (i got pretty far while working public).

I feel sad to say but a 50% cut to the public sector would probably make it as efficient as a failing business. I know this isn’t true for all fields and mine might be the diamond in the rough… But around here the public industry is known as “retirement”.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.14.09 @ 09:40 AM

The main problem with government workers, is they are lazy and selfish .Government workers are Not the shrpest tools in the shed..Thats why we need so many of them to do simple tasks..Put people on welfare to work…it will cost nothing..

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.17.09 @ 09:17 AM

There is no budget crisis in California: there is however, a crisis in leadership.

The failure of our politicians to do what needs to be done is the reason for the popularity of constitutional referendums in California that often only tie lawmaker’s hands when they attempt to solve multi-faceted issues with balance and compromise. It’s a vicious circle.

No amount of tax or fee increases, spending cuts or federal stimulus will solve California’s budget problem. So long as we have the two party system what we’ll need to get the people’s business done is leadership. What we need is a California Barak Obama.

Even with our problems, I would much rather be in California than Kansas, or Detroit where I grew up.  California’s roads aren’t paved with gold like they used to be but its still better than any of the other 47 states I’ve been in.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.18.09 @ 09:13 AM

The state constitution requires the legislature to provide the governor with a balanced budget by a set deadline that he/she can sign. It’s part of the oath of office that all members of the legislature and executive branch take to serve.

They have all FAILED, and failed repeatedly. Why not freeze their pay, travel, per diem, benefit packages retroactively to the start of the Emergency Session?

Then bar them all from using any political slush funds to backfill.

Let THEM experience the recession the way the rest of Californians are right now,
digging ever deeper into our own pockets just to survive.

Let NONE of their compensation be made available to them, even retroactively, after they eventually pass some kind of budget that gets signed. They have NOT done their duty. They should NOT get paid. Period.

These Sacramento public failures have been an ongoing nightmare since the
electricity de-reg fiasco a dozen years ago. It’s clear that the ruling class of BOTH
political parties are totally corrupted and inept.

A modest proposal would be to BAN any individual now serving in any elective area
of state government from being legally eligible to run again in any state election for ten years.

Get these clowns OUT of the Sacramento beltway, into real jobs, if any of them are
still capable of any useful socio-economic activity away from the public trough.

Malfeasance? Misfeasance? Nonfeasance? Who cares? It’s clear that there is no
leadership, courage, desire to put the public welfare ahead of narrow special interest, ideological, partisan concerns. A plague on all their houses!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Goleta Police Warn Public About Recent Home Burglaries

Witnesses report seeing a suspect going door to door in the neighborhood around Scripps Crescent Street

Approval from Santa Barbara County Supervisors the Last Step for Venoco’s New Pipeline

The board will consider an ordinance allowing the company to begin transporting oil via a pipeline that has already been built, instead of by barge

Pacific Storm Expected to Bring Rain, Wind Back to Santa Barbara County on Tuesday

Weather officials say South Coast could receive up to 1½ inches of rain with wind gusting to 30 mph

Santa Barbara-Goleta-Montecito Open House Listings: Feb. 5, 2012

Coldwell Banker, Prudential and Sotheby's post Sunday open house listings

Open House Listings: Feb. 4 & Feb. 5, 2012

Weekend open house listings for Santa Barbara, Goleta, Montecito, Carpinteria and Santa Barbara County

Weather: Fair 59.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive