Goleta Council Backs Inclusionary Exemption for Planned Assisted-Care Facility

General Plan Amendment required for proposed residential project to pass muster with housing element.

By Lara Cooper, Noozhawk Staff Writer | Published on 03.03.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (2)
    • Share

Applicants for Mariposa at Ellwood Shores got the nod from the Goleta City Council on Tuesday, which directed city staff to move forward with the General Plan Amendment the proposed 99-resident assisted-care facility would require.

The project drew a 4-0 vote of approval, with Councilwoman Margaret Connell abstaining.

Mariposa would be built at 7760 Hollister Ave.; Dixon’s Goleta Storage currently sits on the property, which is just under three acres in size.

The issue under examination was the city’s housing element, which requires residential developments to provide a percentage of units for affordable — or inclusionary — housing or pay a fee, to house those who work locally. Because an assisted-care facility would be classified as institutional use, instead of residential, and because it would not be providing housing for local workers, city staff said the inclusionary rate should not apply.

According to staff reports, no other jurisdiction in the region is known to have an inclusionary requirement for assisted-living communities. State funds, like Medi-Cal, do not apply to assisted-living facilities. Federally insured financing requires that all residents receiving the same package be charged the same fee.

The property would also need to be rezoned and have additional permits issued, but council members just tackled the General Plan Amendment on Tuesday.

Harwood White, agent for the project’s owner, said the project has been in the works since cityhood began. He said enforcing an inclusionary rate on the facility would render the project “infeasible.”

“Customarily, an inclusionary requirement has to do with rent or with purchasing a home,” he said. “Assisted living goes much further than that.”

Mariposa’s best source of financing is through the Federal Housing Administration of the Housing and Urban Development Department (FHA HUD), and HUD requires privately owned market-rate facilities to not charge different fees to their residents, he said.

The small units would be “affordable by design,” White said.

Mariposa would have 44 employees. Of the two public speakers, both said the facility should take responsibility for housing its workers. Gary Vandeman said two-thirds of the employees at Mariposa would make $10 an hour or less, and Barbara Massey followed suit, saying the project would create dozens of low-cost jobs without mitigating the impacts.

Steve Chase, city planning and environmental services director, urged the council to provide staff with direction so they could deal with the contradictory housing policy.

“This policy is a mess,” he said. “It applies to employment, yet it is placed in the residential component of inclusionary housing. It’s out of sync.”

Connell said she understood the institutional nature of the facility, but that inclusionary rates should still apply for the employees.

White said he hoped the project would be before decision makers in the fall.

Write to lcooper@noozhawk.com

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

Ground Rules for Posting Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.
  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your comment.
Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Name:

» Once Again... wrote on 03.04.09 @ 07:07 AM

Once again Margaret Connell is out of synch with the rest of the city council.  What’s her batting average this year, like .100?

» Vic Cox wrote on 03.04.09 @ 08:37 AM

Actually, Margaret is demonstrating a thoughtful caution about changing the General Plan every time a low-wage development project seems outside the present rules structure. In this case, there may be legal reasons that force rezoning. However, unmentioned in this article is that the Mariposa’s corporate owner is a for-profit organization so they are not proposing this facility as a community service.

 

More Local News »

Supervisors Face Grim Budget Picture, Rising Benefit Costs

The governor's proposed budget and other fiscal challenges — including county staffing, salaries and retirement — will top the agenda Tuesday

Hotel Developer Aims to Trim Extended Stay with Goleta Design Review

Planning board will size up latest version of previously pared Marriott Residence Inn project

‘Spirit of the Ocean’ Rock Party a Rain and Shine Event

Two boulders at La Patera Ranch will be carved into a replica of the famous courthouse fountain

Judge Upholds Life Sentence for Jesse James Hollywood

The defense's motion for a new trial is denied in the kidnap-murder of Nicholas Markowitz

Former News-Press Editor Jerry Roberts Wins Arbitration Award

Court documents show owner/publisher Wendy McCaw has been ordered to $1 million in legal fees and arbitration costs

Weather: Overcast 50.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive