- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
City Council Denies Appeals of Upper State Street Development
After 11 public hearings, seven years and a five-hour meeting on Tuesday, a proposed development for Upper State Street finally got the nod from the Santa Barbara City Council.
The approved project calls for 73 condominiums, an office building and two commercial condos at 3714 and 3744 State St., where the Downtown Brewing Co. and Sandman Inn currently stand.
The average square footage for each condo hovers around 1,200 square feet, with 11 of those units classified as affordable.
The council voted unanimously to deny the appeals of two neighborhood groups — the Citizens Planning Association and the Allied Neighborhood Association — that voiced concerns about the project, including its environmental documents.
The groups’ lawyer, Marc Chytilo, appeared before the council Tuesday to make his case.
When the project started out, it included plans for a new hotel and residential units, but it also presented some alternatives, including one similar to the current proposal. The environmental documents that were conducted included those alternatives, and though the approved project is slightly different, city staff said the scope of the original documents would suffice.
Most of the discussion Tuesday centered on the discrepancy between the environmental documents and what could happen in the future if they weren’t changed to match the current project.
The City Council, City Attorney Steve Wiley and Chytilo batted about a theoretical scenario in which an Orange County developer, for example, could come forward and purchase the property and put forward a new hotel proposal.
“There is some legal vulnerability,” Chytilo said. “Developers want to use old EIRs when they can get away with it.”
Chytilo also took issue with the city’s interpretation of several items throughout its CEQA process, and each member of the council agreed that the process should be clarified for the public, including Councilman Dale Francisco, who asked that city documents be made readable for those who aren’t “CEQA lawyers.”
“If the public can’t understand, the process is meaningless,” he said.
Wiley said the environmental documents would be likely to stay the same in the Orange County developer scenario, but it would be considered a new project and have to start over — gaining the approval of the city’s various boards and commissions.
City staff repeatedly said the existence of environmental documents doesn’t automatically approve a project.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved the project in December, and the majority of speakers during Tuesday’s public comment period spoke in favor of it.
City staff said they felt the project was environmentally superior to what’s there now, and even said that traffic trips in that area would be reduced by up 800 per day.
Greg Parker of Investec Real Estate Companies, one of the groups behind the new project, said it would continue to operate the hotel until the timing is right to build the project.
He also said they might approach local employers about partnership in the housing, including Cottage Hospital. City planner Betty Weiss said approvals for the project would last up to five years.
The council denied the appeal Tuesday, but the item will return for final adoption before the end of March.
— Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 03.11.10 @ 09:50 AM
Today’s paper announces new all time unemployment rate for SB at the same time this new office building gets the go ahead through denying the appeal. A big fat empty office building. Bizarre.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.11.10 @ 11:51 AM
As I saw it (on tv), the appeal was not about the project itself.
The appeal was on a legal “process” issue.
Do City bodies, in their evironmental impact deliberations, have to specify a
“preferred” project choice (as suggested by state law)?
Those appealing seem to worry that by not making that choice, the City implies
that a project of housing and office-commercial would have impacts no different
from an all-housing project of smaller size.
On the face of it, those two different projects would have very different impact
potential.
But the City disagreed, and denied the appeal, on how environmental studies
should be reviewed and prioritized.
That seemed to have little to do with the actual project on the table, which had
been approved weeks ago.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.11.10 @ 03:06 PM
If the project was to support illegal alien housing, it would of passed—Das-Grant & Helene the new Yorker would have love it..
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
SBCC Receives But Won’t Release Draft of Findings from State Oversight Commission
The college has 30 days to respond, after which the ACCJC is expected to issue a public decision
County Supervisors Approve First Reading of Oil Pipeline Agreement for Venoco
Next week's public meeting the last step before the company can begin operations
Goleta Seeks Public Input on Law Enforcement Services
Participants are needed for two focus groups scheduled for Feb. 15
City Council Authorizes Design Contract for Redevelopment of Cliff Drive Intersection
Tuesday's meeting is dedicated to Santa Barbara filmmaker Mike deGruy, who died in a helicopter crash; a memorial service is planned for Sunday
Goleta Woman Accused of Having Sex with Teen Boy
Sheriff's Department says victim recently came forward about 2008 relationship
Weather: Fair 44.0º
Search Noozhawk »
