- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Politics
- School Zone
- Back to School
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Calendar
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Consumer Advocacy Coalition Is a Growing Force for County’s Mental Health Community
Less than a year after the Consumer Advocacy Coalition was formed, the group’s executive director is gearing up for what may be its toughest challenge yet. Roger Thompson, who oversees the mental health advocacy group, is on a mission to educate the public about Proposition 1E, one of a half-dozen ballot measures facing voters in May.
If approved in the May 19 special election, Prop. 1E would divert over two years’ time $500 million from mental health programs to the state’s general fund in an effort to close California’s $42 billion deficit. The proposition deals with funds put in place by a 2004 initiative, Proposition 63, which implemented an additional 1 percent tax on households with incomes of $1 million or above. Currently, that money goes to create new and expanded mental health programs for children and adults.
“Prop. 63 is working,” Thompson said. “Two hundred thousand people are enrolled in mental health services that weren’t before 2004, including 50,000 children.”
If funds are siphoned from mental health programs to ease the budget deficit, he said, more and more Santa Barbara County residents who survive by utilizing available services will likely face increased risks of homelessness or jail time. Without continued support of medicine or counseling services, many more residents will simply fall through the cracks.
The money redirected toward the state’s general fund, Thompson said, would offset less than a percent of the current deficit. Taking money from a mental health fund if Prop. 1E passes would set a bad precedent, on both the state and federal levels, he said.
“California is a hugely important state, politically, and what we do here, the world watches,” he said.
While explaining his nonprofit organization’s efforts, Thompson shares his own experiences, putting a human face on the budget cuts the mental health community faces. The 28-year-old, who has bipolar disorder, got involved in April 2008, when he was told his services would be cut, and he realized that about 800 people might be similarly affected.
“Not everyone is able to advocate for themselves effectively,” said Thompson, noting that he felt a responsibility to speak out. In spite of pleas made before the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, about $4 million in mental health cuts went forward last year. The effects of those cuts weren’t fully realized until a few months later, Thompson said, but when people who had relied on services found themselves cut loose, reality set in.
“I saw people losing hope, and becoming very symptomatic,” he explained. Thompson himself lost his ability to check in with a therapist for his own disorder and he said he became suicidal. About 300 people were directly affected by the cuts and three were left homeless, he said.
When funding for simple activities such as writing and poetry groups came to an end, Thompson said, some people lost an opportunity to interact with their therapists and others, so the hastily formed Consumer Advocacy Coalition stepped in to duplicate some of those activities. Gathering spaces were quickly donated and volunteers came forward to lead the sessions, which allowed the CAC to offer them four days each week.
CAC kicked its efforts into high gear after All 4 CMH (County Mental Health), an advocacy group of mental health community organizations and nonprofits, disbanded last year after the cuts were passed, Thompson said.
In addition to a December town hall meeting in Santa Barbara, a meeting took place last week in Santa Maria. At that gathering, a panel of six people from community-based organizations; alcohol, drug and mental health services; and consumers talked about their vision for the county’s mental health efforts, and took questions from the public. Fifth District Supervisor Joe Centeno and 3rd District Supervisor Doreen Farr were present at the meeting, which lasted nearly two hours.
After one recent meeting, a woman approached Thompson. Worried that she would lose her access to an aggressive county treatment program, she asked Thompson for help. “She had fresh cut marks running down her arms,” he said. When he asked the county Department of Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health Services about the cut-off date for service, workers assured Thompson the woman’s services would not end. “Thank God that CAC was there, because we were able to intervene and do something,” he said.
Thompson said he isn’t sure exactly how the county would be affected if Proposition 1E passes, but he noted that a large number of people would see services reduced, which in turn would possibly strain emergency rooms and jails, as well as contribute to homelessness. Cuts in services “would be far more costly to the taxpayer here,” he said.
The CAC is California’s most vocal consumer group when it comes to opposing Prop. 1E, Thompson said.
“If we can create a stir here in Santa Barbara County, and if we can do it in a county that’s the third-worst funded in the state, I think people will take note,” he said.
CAC plans to increase its presence on Facebook and YouTube and is planning an April 22 news conference about Prop. 1E.
Thompson admits he is humbly learning about the process by seeking input from others.
“If I don’t hear from the public, I’ll just have to go to Borders and buy Opposing Propositions for Dummies,” he joked. “Contacting us and saying, ‘Hey, I want to help,’ or ‘Here’s an idea,’ I think that’s what it’s going to take.”
— Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
» wrote on 03.26.09 @ 06:10 PM
This is a very sad story but a little vague in terms of how the money is spent. There was a reference to a woman receiving aggressive treatment from the county, but exactly what does that mean? Paid medications? Psychiatric visits? There was one reference to people becoming homeless. Was housing provided to these people prior to the budget being cut? I need more info.
» wrote on 03.27.09 @ 04:48 AM
Well written. Responding to Loud Whispers, there is a woman receiving treatment from ACT - a high intensive county-funded program for mental health services. Her services were slated to get axed but CAC was able to intervene and make certain she wouldn’t loose them. Second, three people were left homeless as a result of the county budget cuts last year. This was because some of the programs that were cut also provided housing. If you need more info, visit our site or e-mail us directly!
More Local News »
Supervisors Face Grim Budget Picture, Rising Benefit Costs
The governor's proposed budget and other fiscal challenges — including county staffing, salaries and retirement — will top the agenda Tuesday
Hotel Developer Aims to Trim Extended Stay with Goleta Design Review
Planning board will size up latest version of previously pared Marriott Residence Inn project
‘Spirit of the Ocean’ Rock Party a Rain and Shine Event
Two boulders at La Patera Ranch will be carved into a replica of the famous courthouse fountain
Judge Upholds Life Sentence for Jesse James Hollywood
The defense's motion for a new trial is denied in the kidnap-murder of Nicholas Markowitz
Former News-Press Editor Jerry Roberts Wins Arbitration Award
Court documents show owner/publisher Wendy McCaw has been ordered to $1 million in legal fees and arbitration costs
Weather: Light Rain 52.0º
Search Noozhawk »
Today's Calendar events - 02.09.10 »
