- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Grand Jury Recommends Giving Citizens Access to Police Patrol Car Videos
The Santa Barbara County Grand Jury has concluded that if citizens have access to the patrol car video recordings of their brushes with police, there could be fewer legal complaints filed against law enforcement departments.
In an October report, the Grand Jury found that all law enforcement agencies but two have audio/visual recording equipment in their patrol vehicles and recommended that the Santa Barbara and Guadalupe police departments get camera systems as soon as possible.
The Santa Barbara department has budgeted $250,000 to buy a system but hasn’t made a final selection on a vendor, according to Sgt. Riley Harwood. The estimated cost is $8,000 per car, and the department plans to equip all 27 patrol cars.
The Guadalupe department is still looking for a funding source.
Though most agencies have the recording equipment, people aren’t given access to the recordings without entering the legal process and usually aren’t even told their contacts with officers are recorded. But the Grand Jury believes earlier access could prevent legal action in the first place.
“When citizens and parents/guardians inquired about an incident and were informed that there was an A/V recording, in an overwhelming number of cases, the issue was dropped,” law enforcement personnel told the Grand Jury during the investigation.
With the goal of increasing transparency and saving staff time and costs for police agencies, the Grand Jury recommends that agencies allow citizens stopped by patrol officers to view recordings, without needing to file a legal complaint to do so.
Agencies should also give citizens verbal and printed notice that there is a recording with information of when and where they can view it, notify parents/guardians if their child has a recorded police contact, and calculate the potential financial savings of implementing those changes, the Grand Jury recommended.
Santa Barbara police have tested seven camera system companies and run several pilot programs. One of those test cameras was in Officer Aaron Tudor’s car Oct. 21 when he pulled over driver Tony Denunzio on suspicion of drunken driving. Some witnesses say excessive force was used by Tudor, but Police Chief Cam Sanchez maintains that no rules were broken. The video captured a portion of the interaction between the two, though the struggle moves out of view for a large segment.
The incident came just two weeks after the Grand Jury’s report recommending that all agencies implemented cameras in patrol cars to increase transparency.
— Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.
Grand Jury Report: citizen access to law enforcement audio/visual recordings
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use
» on 06.12.12 @ 10:42 AM
And BTW, whatever happened to the investigation of Officer Beutel and clarification of allegations against her that the mayor promised us?
» on 08.23.12 @ 09:02 PM
John Locke: Mayor Schneider’s investigation of Beutel seems to have started with Schneider’s failure to mention that SBPD was violating the city’s record retention policy. The section of the city Manual for Record Retention that specifies SBPD record retention rules was removed from the city website. On July 3, 2012, city council considered a consent calendar motion to destroy police records over two years old at Sanchez’s request, rather than after 5 years, and Kathy Murillo seconded a motion to approve consent calendar items. Resolution 12-049 is a record of this, but isn’t on the city website - I guess they’ve added the JUMP-Through-The FOI-Request-Hoop to cc resolutions. Murillo urged people to communicate complaints about police at city council meetings, a process that’s specifically mentioned as disallowed in the city charter, along with all other employee issues, which are required to be discussed in closed sessions - good bait for POA litigation. I don’t know what’s going on with Tom Parker’s petition for a ballot initiative to allow the mayor and council to remove department heads such as Sanchez, but I think we’ve had enough information about the mayor and council’s intention to act on police corruption since Parker announced his initiative to demonstrate that city hall’s refusal to provide oversight has enabled corruption in SBPD.
The Grand Jury missed THE relevant issue re SBPD dash cams - that the only one SBPD currently has was used only to destroy and manipulate evidence in an attempt to bias the recording against the person arrested, and that SBPD and the DA’s office refused to release video evidence (including private cell phone recordings) to either the media or defense.
More Local News »
Open House Listings: May 25 & May 26, 2013
Mountain Lion Sighting Reported Near Santa Ynez School
Santa Maria Police Respond to Reports of Shots Fired
Santa Barbara County Officials Discuss Local Effects of Federal Health-Care Law
Forum gives the public an opportunity to ask questions about the Affordable Care Act, set to take effect Jan. 1
Sex Trial of Former St. Joseph Student to Begin
Weather: Fair 58.0º
Search Noozhawk »
