Santa Barbara Council Votes for Resolution Favoring Oil Moratorium

The 5-1 vote followed more than an hour of impassioned testimony on both sides of the issue.

By Rob Kuznia, Noozhawk Staff Writer | Published on 09.10.2008

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Post | View Comments (2)
    • Share

After listening to more than an hour of impassioned testimony from members of the public on both sides of the issue, the Santa Barbara City Council on Tuesday voted 5-1 in support of a symbolic resolution that favors keeping in place the state and federal moratorium on new leases for oil drilling off the coast of Santa Barbara.

Presented to the council by Mayor Marty Blum and council members Das Williams and Helene Schneider, the resolution was meant to counterbalance another symbolic statement made by the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, which last month sent the opposite message in a 3-2 vote to send Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger a letter requesting that he support lifting the ban, saying it would help lower gas prices and reduce America’s dependency on foreign oil, as well as generate revenue for the county.

Councilman Dale Francisco cast the lone no vote, and Councilman Roger Horton — who said he favors the resolution — was absent.

Among the people who spoke from the pro-drilling perspective was Bruce Allen of the group S.O.S. (Stop Oil Seeps) California. Allen argued that lifting the ban and allowing more drilling would improve the environment by reducing the amount of oil that for centuries has been seeping from the ocean floor naturally.

“We are not saying you can completely eliminate it,” he said, “but we do believe you can reduce it.”

Allen also argued that lifting the ban could allow Santa Barbara County to reap up to $330 million annually in royalties.

Among those who spoke in support of maintaining the moratorium was Dave Davis of the local nonprofit Community Environmental Council. Davis said the United States needs to break its addiction to oil, and — given a newfound worldwide phenomenon in which demand is outstripping supply – is running out of time.

“By 2030, we will need 9.5 new Saudi Arabias to maintain the oil addiction we have today,” he said. “Offshore drilling is a distraction from getting to the real business of moving this country into a new technological frontier of renewable energy.”

Blum said the push for more drilling in coastal waters is disingenuous.

“To say that we are completely against any oil drilling — if you sit at almost any house in Santa Barbara and look at the ocean you see oil drilling out there,” she said. “We have an oil processing plant on the coast that’s not even being used.

“I just think that the reason has to do with the presidential election coming up, and it really truly bothers me that we are trying to make this into a very political argument.”

Williams referred to more drilling as “a bridge to nowhere.”

“The future is going to be in alternatives,” he said.

Williams added that he respects how the oil industry was once a major foundation of the South Coast’s middle class.

“I believe that energy can once again be a foundation of the middle class, but it’s not going to be in oil,” he said.

Francisco said he believed the council was acting with undue haste on a topic that is enormously complex.

“Even though it’s a symbolic action, I’d like it to be a well-considered action,” he said. “I don’t think putting it on the agenda with one week’s notice does justice to this topic.”

Noozhawk staff writer Rob Kuznia can be reached at rkuznia@noozhawk.com.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.

  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
  4. Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
  5. Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
  6. Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» tom becker on 09.11.08 @ 09:53 AM

Here are the facts:

90% of the energy we consume comes from carbon based fuels.

5% of the energy we consume comes from “renewables” such as solar, wind and geothermal.

99% of our transportation fuel is carbon based.

The United States has 2 trillion barrels of shale oil. That’s almost 300 years worth of oil at current U.S consumption.

The U.S has coal deposits that can supply us with 250 years of electrical energy at current demand.

There are at least 10 billion barrels of conventional oil off California’s coast. That’s 20-25 years worth of oil imports from Saudi Arabia.

There’s at least 10 billion barrels of oil in Alaska and in the Beaufort Sea. That’s 20-25 years worth of oil imports from the rest of the Persian Gulf.

In 20 to 25 years we will begin to shift our oil consumption from conventional oil to shale oil and coal based synfuels.

We can begin oil production from existing offshore federal leases in 2 years. We can begin production from state leases in one year. We can achieve full production in 10 years.

Based on a 400,000/day production rate, the potential federal royality from oil located offshore of Santa Barbara County is $4 million/day.

If the North County were to cut a deal with the feds and give the feds jurisdiction over oil and gas development, With North County environmential review and control, in exchange for 15% of the royalties, North County would make $600,000/day. All onshore oil and gas facilities would then be located in North County.

9000 jobs would be created directly and indirectly in North County.

In 10 years the economic power and population demographic would shift to North County, ensuring North County dominance.


» david on 09.11.08 @ 01:02 PM

Morons…did you expect otherwise?


More Local News »

Residents Get Look at Master Plan for Santa Barbara

An open house kicks off a public-comment period designed to help shape the future of the city

Ninth Circuit Court to Rehear Goleta Rent-Control Case

The appeal on 'regulatory taking' could determine the constitutionality of the city's ordinance

Bob Wilcher: Guaranteed Weight Loss

Eat 500 fewer calories and exercise for one hour each day and enjoy the results

Santa Barbara Developer Fess Parker Dies at Age 85

The local actor was also the namesake of Fess Parker DoubleTree Resort and Fess Parker Winery

Santa Barbara’s Water Has a Rich History, a Complex Future

Despite modern science and technology, basic challenges of delivery and storage transcend eras

Weather: Fair 55.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive