Joe Armendariz: Many Uninsured Could ‘Self-Insure’ for Routine Health Procedures

Consumer-driven programs already exist. So why is the government getting in the way?

By | Published on 09.13.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Post | View Comments (15)
  • Share
 

According to a Census Bureau report, “Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008,” released last week, there were 46.3 million uninsured Americans in 2008, up from 45.6 million in 2007 — an increase of less than 1 percent.

Article Image

The nearby chart illustrates the fact that 9 million uninsured Americans are living in households earning $75,000 per year or more. About 8 million Americans who went without health insurance in 2008 earned between $50,000 and $75,000. If we combine the two groups, the percentage of uninsured Americans earning more than $50,000 in 2008 was roughly 38 percent.

Question: With $50,000 or more in household income, wouldn’t many or most of those 38 percent be without health insurance voluntarily? As a recovering health insurance professional who spent 20 years in the business, I will tell you the answer is unequivocally yes. It isn’t because the price for health insurance is too expensive, assuming the person is reasonably healthy, it is always because they have better things to spend their after-tax income on.

A few clicks over at ehealthinsurance.com, for example, resulted in me quickly finding 94 plans starting at $92 per month for a male nonsmoker in his 40s. A male nonsmoker in his 50s has 99 plans from which to choose, starting at $132 per month. A male nonsmoker in his 30s has 94 plans from which to choose, starting at $59 per month, and a male nonsmoker in his 20s ... well, he has 94 plans starting at $47 per month. This is significantly less than a typical premium cable package.

I realize there are variations in insurance premiums based on other factors, including geography. But even if you add a 20 percent load to each of those premiums to account for smokers and then another 15 percent load to allow for changes in geography, you are still well within what a person earning $50,000 per year or more should be able to afford.

Joe Armendariz
Joe Armendariz

Another caveat is that all of these plans are available in California only ... but if we were to change the law and allow health insurance to be bought and sold across state lines, the number of insurance options would increase dramatically. This is an essential reform of the health insurance market, and yet it is absent from all of the plans currently under serious consideration by Congress and the Obama administration.

In addition to ehealthinsurance.com, there are other exciting developments in the health-care industry that are making health care more affordable for the average American family, and yet they are completely ignored by the politicians. For example, today there are more than 1,200 (and growing daily) health-care clinics around the country operating inside retail stores. These include Walgreens, Target, Costco, CVS and Walmart. Many of these retail health clinics are staffed by full-time nurse practitioners, do not require their customers to have medical insurance policies to receive treatment, and they do not require an appointment to be treated. These are quintessential examples of consumer-driven health care.

Other consumer-driven programs can be found and accessed online. For example, the following Web sites are also changing the way people purchase health care in the United States and should be looked at as a model for how to expand access, lower costs and improve quality. They include HealthMarkets.com, MedEncentive.com, Planethospital.com, MedRetreat.com, SimpleCare.com, CashDoctor.com, Doctor on Call, TelaDoc.com, MinuteClinic.com, HealthDialog.com, HealthGrades.com and Subimo.com. And there are several others.



These cutting-edge programs represent the real future of American health care. The bad news is President Barack Obama and Congress are stuck in the 1960s, where every idea and solution is expected to originate from Washington, D.C. Apparently, the entrepreneurial, patient-centered health-care service providers listed above didn’t get the memo. But they are moving forward nonetheless and that is great news for not only America’s families but it’s great news for America’s uninsured, because help really is on the way. Indeed, help is already here if the bureaucrats, lawyers and politicians would just get out of the way.

The bottom line: The future of American health care will transcend partisan politics and the predictable efforts by lawyers to control the outcome of any health-care reform. This is true because at the end of the day it is first and foremost about consumer-driven health-care markets, and more choices and competition for that first dollar of care. This is the exact opposite of a third-party system that has failed so totally.

The myriad of high-tech innovations in our health-care system as well as the unconventional points of service for preventive/routine and emergency care are already empowering individuals, small businesses, families and communities. This is due to decentralized “regional markets” more than any so-called top-down command-and-control reform legislation contrived by the Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill. But, then, none of us should be surprised that the politicians always move slower than the gales of creative destruction.

— Joe Armendariz is a Carpinteria city councilman and co-founder of Armendariz Partners, a public affairs consulting firm.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 09.13.09 @ 11:05 PM

What Armendariz fails to mention are the number of people who might be able to afford health insurance but CANNOT get insurance due to such things as preexisting conditions.

While those people may be able to eventually get into the state’s high-risk pool, the premiums are outrageously expensive, at least double what someone would pay for a normal policy.

It’s obvious that that insurance companies want to cherry-pick the people they insure. And this will likely continue until some type of health care reform measure is passed.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 07:45 AM

joe, your “I realize there are variations in insurance premiums” statement understates the disparity in premiums for pre-existing conditions. My husband and I both self insure and are both 43 and in good health. My husband unfortunately had cancer at 35 and, while fully recovered, must pay $611 per month, while I was offered a high deductible plan for $150 per month.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 08:30 AM

Joe, your internet search results are very misleading. It is false advertising as far as my experience has shown: I am a healthy person who had back surgery (and completely recovered)some years ago. I am disqualified from most policies completely, and must pay extra for the one I was able to purchase. Just because it is posted online does NOT mean consumers will qualify, or that the rates will remain the same for more than a few months. The last increase I got was for over 35%. I am self-employed and must buy an individual policy.
Here is more ‘great news for the uninsured’: I was billed directly by a medical lab for a few tests last month - after I advised I had med insurance, they then billed the insurance company. As it falls under my deductible, I received an amended bill with the insurance ‘discount’ applied:  for an uninsured patient, the charges would have been $170.00 -  for an insured patient, they were $64.00   !!!! 

GREAT NEWS INDEED! but not for the uninsured. Until ALL citizens can buy reasonably priced health insurance, I think some changes are in order.  Clearly there are some major problems in the free-market approach we currently “enjoy” .

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 08:59 AM

Joe– I would bet those $100/month plans have huge deductibles and poor coverage. What type of coverage do they offer?

I would venture that young people most often do not buy health insurance for themselves because they do not believe they will get sick.

(I’ll check out some of those places mentioned above, though…)

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 09:12 AM

This argument misses a key fact: that insurance companies are loathe to insure anyone with any health history. When I left my last job to move back to California, I could afford health insurance and would have happily paid for it, but was denied because of a series of migraines I had several years before. Other than that, I was extremely healthy. I was stuck paying COBRA from my previous job at $1,400 month for the family.

This is the case with many people I know, particularly professionals who leave group plans with a company to take on consulting or more entrepreneurial endeavors.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 09:13 AM

And next a word from our next sponsor a payday loan company.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 09:24 AM

I’m shocked, SHOCKED that Armendariz is loose with his selective facts and spin.  He needs a dose of reality about the health care crisis.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 10:21 AM

Joe wonders why approximately six percent of the American population - those living in households making over $50 thousand a year who don’t have health insurance - aren’t taking advantage of a list of online offers - including medical tourism - or simply dropping in to Walgreens for cancer treatment and tonsillectomies.

The answer’s pretty simple: most are medically uninsurable, struggling just to get by, or both. And that’s not counting another 30 million uninsured Americans who live in households earning less than $50 thousand a year.

Yes, the market should play a role in making health care affordable. Hooray for anyone or any business actually finding ways to bring down the cost of quality treatment. That combined with a system of providing non-profit insurance coverage for all Americans will save us billions of dollars a year.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 11:16 AM

You rock Joe! Yes, it’s true…people could forgo a few things like cable tv and afford health insurance. It’s a choice. Many people chose not to have health insurance and they still won’t sign up for it even when it is available for free. We currently have quite a few free or low-cost clinics available. There’s an Indian Clinic at the State street/154 exit that will see people for free and quite a few others in town as well. The only reform I see is one to help some of the pre-existing conditions get the health care they desperately need. Although, I’m not opposed to healthier living and the “Fat Camp” is not a bad idea either, but maybe the adults should attend too! If everyone took care of themselves and cut back on being couch potatoes then maybe we wouldn’t have to waste our tax dollars on this ridiculous health care plan that Obama is trying to pass.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 11:37 AM

Getting private health insurance can be tricky. Based on my own experience—and I have a preexisting condition—I recommend folks get up-to-date on all their medical tests while they’re still covered by an employer’s plan. If you have any fear you’ll be denied, considering using an insurance agent. It’s in the agent’s interest to get you a policy because he/she earns a commission from the insurer.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 02:13 PM

I have already stated my support for an individual mandate with a guaranteed issue component which would lead to universal coverage.

Those individuals who have a pre-existing condition would and should be covered without exceptions and in some cases without limitations and this is true of most of the insurance reforms working their way through the Congress.

My article wasn’t intended as a comprehensive reform proposal…obviously I am aware of the challenges people with pre-existing conditions have securing adequate insurance coverage; I spent twenty years helping people secure coverage who were in that situation.

My objective was to focus attention on some facts and metrics related to the uninsured vis-a-vis annual income and to highlight some specific market oriented, consumer driven reforms that that could become effective solutions for many of those individuals.

Moreover, I specifically included in my article above the following caveat when discussing price and availability:

“assuming the person is reasonably healthy…”

I recognize there are several additional issues that need to be addressed as part of any intelligent reform package. Unfortunately, addressing them all in an 800+ word commentary isn’t a realistic proposition.

Joe Armendariz
5212 Carpinteria Avenue
Carpinteria, Ca, 93013
Office: 805.684.0678 • Mobile: 805.990.2494

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 02:47 PM

Joe Armendariz suggestions are far beyond the reach of most even though he describes the options as affordable. AlsovArmendariz’s suggestions and the comments posted describe tenuous systems that are also very complicated.  I support President Obama’s proposed “public option” and all his proposed requirements, including to have it paid for rather than borrowing, but what we really need is a simple single payer system or Medicare for All.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 05:14 PM

Reality check.  A little math on that healthy 40 yr old male making $50k.  After tax is $37.5k, after insurance premium ($92x12= $1,104) leaves about $3k month for housing, food, clothing etc. This assumes no other medical costs like the deductible which is $2,500 yr or office visits which that policy doesn’t cover, or prescription drugs and if it’s major the policy only covers up to 80% of costs.  Great deal Joe and what if he is married to a female age 39 and has a son age 10 and daughter age 9?  Premium is $204 per month with same deductible etc. the policy is rated 2.5 out of 5 stars, I looked and couldn’t find a 5 star?.
I searched by doctor and no more than 18 GP’s Internal medicine doc’s came up.  If I had more time I’d call to see who was taking new patients.  Any bets?  I’d say maybe 3.  The fact is Americans spend an average of $7,290 a year on health care, more than twice the average for developed countries. Despite that, the United States lags in life expectancy, infant mortality and preventable deaths.  Our system is rated 37th in the world by the WHO.
How about a town hall meeting?  Invite both sides for an adult discussion of the facts.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.14.09 @ 06:52 PM

> The fact is Americans spend an average of $7,290 a
> year on health care, more than twice the average
> for developed countries.

This is the crux of the matter.  It should be front
and center in the debate, but it isn’t.

There is a lot of angst on whether we can afford
health reform.  Of course we can.  We have a system
that costs us twice as much as other countries and
yet underperforms according to many measures. 

It has been proven in Europe, Canada, Australia, Japan,
etc, that high quality universal health care can be
delivered for about one half of what we are paying now.

But if we did his there would be losers, eg, the insurance
industry.  This is what the “debate” is really all about…

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 09.15.09 @ 09:48 AM

We need every single citizen of this country covered with decent health insurance.  Private industry has demonstrated it is unwilling to do this. The government must intervene to bring us up to the standard of every other developed nation.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Santa Barbara-Goleta-Montecito Open House Listings: Feb. 5, 2012

Coldwell Banker, Prudential and Sotheby's post Sunday open house listings

Open House Listings: Feb. 4 & Feb. 5, 2012

Weekend open house listings for Santa Barbara, Goleta, Montecito, Carpinteria and Santa Barbara County

Big-Rig Driver Killed in Highway 101 Crash Was Under the Influence of Meth, Officials Say

The tractor-trailer struck a sedan, trapping a woman and her young daughters inside the vehicle as it dangled over a bridge railing

Santa Barbara Police Issue 60 Citations in Crosswalk Sting

Citizen complaints a driving force behind the department's enforcement operation, targeting three intersections

$7,500 Reward Offered for Information Leading to Suspects in Apparent New Year’s Hate Crime

Santa Barbara police believe the two victims were targeted because they were perceived by their attackers to be gay

Weather: Mostly Cloudy 58.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive