- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Politics
- School Zone
- Youth Camps
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Santa Barbara City Council Votes to Let Madison’s Dance Again
Now might be a good time for patrons of Madison’s Sports Grill on State Street to do a victory jig.
To the relief of the bar’s owners, the Santa Barbara City Council on Tuesday overturned the May decision of the Fire and Police Commission to deny the establishment’s request for a dance permit.
The 4-1 decision means patrons of the bar at 525 State St. still will be able to dance after all, as they have been allowed to do since 2001.
Tuesday marked the third time in less than five months that an establishment on the 500 block of State Street had come before the City Council to appeal a decision by the commission about patrons’ ability to dance. The other two were Bricks Café at 509 State St. and the James Joyce pub at 513 State St. Unlike Madison’s, both of those owners walked away disappointed.
About six months ago, the council, responding to heightened alcohol-related criminal activity in the area, radically amended its dance ordinance in an effort to pay closer scrutiny to the nightclubs in the beer-soaked downtown entertainment district.
Tuesday’s decision came over the objections of management from two hotels on State Street, Hotel Santa Barbara and the Holiday Inn Express, who say their businesses bear the brunt of the raucous behavior and loud noise that accompanies the high prevalence of dance clubs in the area.
In the past three years, one-third of all of the city’s reported late-night criminal offenses — and half of the alcohol-related offenses — occurred in the area with the downtown dance clubs.
On Tuesday, Fire and Police Commission member Dan Signor told the council that he believes the bar owners’ failure to reapply was intentional. “It is my determination they tried to give us the shuffle,” he said.
Owners Derek and Diane Harding emphatically disagreed, making the case that it was an honest mistake — and one from which they had nothing to gain. “There is absolutely no benefit for us to have shirked or intentionally avoided this ordinance to put this $750,000 investment at risk,” Derek Harding told the council. “It’s absurd to think we would do so.”
He said losing the dance permit would cost the bar an estimated $780,000 annually. “It would cripple the business and potentially cause it to close,” he said. “I think this is a little harsh.”
Derek Harding added that the bar has been a good neighbor since he and his wife took majority ownership two years ago, citing several voluntary sacrifices they have made that aren’t required by law.
For instance, he said, the dance club removed its subwoofer speakers, which blast the deep, low-end bass sounds that tend to reverberate through even the thickest of walls.
Also, he said, the establishment’s policy strictly forbids minors unaccompanied by an adult from entering, even though the bar’s liquor license from the state department of Alcoholic Beverage Control allows unaccompanied minors until 10 p.m.
In addition, Harding said that the policy at Madison’s is to keep the back door closed, and suggested that much of the noise that generates complaints from Hotel Santa Barbara next door might actually be coming from the bar next door to Madison’s. That bar, O’Malley’s, has a back patio area where people regularly congregate, he said.
John Greer, an attorney representing Hotel Santa Barbara, scoffed at the idea that Madison’s has been a good neighbor, pointing out that the criminal activity at the location was once so high that the bar lost its dance permit for a year in 2000.
At the time, he added, Diane Harding was a manager. What’s more, he said, the bar on at least one recent occasion hosted a “fire tossing” entertainment event, prompting a warning from a fire inspector.
Above all, he argued that the decision of the Fire and Police Commission be upheld. “It just doesn’t make any sense they should be excused because they claim they didn’t know about any of this,” he said.
The council was generally unmoved by Greer’s arguments. It also unanimously disagreed with the reasoning of the Fire and Police Commission.
“Every once in awhile, there is something to an inadvertent whoops,” Councilwoman Iya Falcone said. “I don’t think there was an intention here to defraud or get away with or subvert any of the process.”
She said she has been to the area at night and finds it plausible that much of the nightlife noise bouncing against the hotel’s walls originates from O’Malley’s, which is two buildings away from the hotel.
“They have an open area backyard, a fairly large one, and they also have an upstairs patio — sort of like a veranda in New Orleans — and there is a tremendous amount of chatter and music and smoke and everything else that wafts right up the wall to Hotel Santa Barbara,” she said.
Councilman Das Williams said he appreciates the compromises the bar owners made in an effort to be good neighbors.
“Removal of their subwoofers is a sacrifice I wouldn’t have made,” he said. “That is something obviously a lot of young people look for.”
Councilman Dale Francisco, who cast the lone no vote, said he agreed that the Fire and Police Commission erred in its interpretation of the ordinance, saying Madison’s failure to reapply wasn’t among the stated grounds in the new ordinance for denying a dance-permit request. But Francisco, who campaigned last November partly on the premise that he wanted to restore authority to some of the city’s appointed advisory commissions, argued that the council should send the decision back to the commission for reconsideration.
“They should be giving the permit,” he said. “They should be doing this job.”
A majority of the council disagreed, and voted 4-1 — with council members Helene Schneider and Roger Horton absent — to grant the bar its dance permit.
Included in the motion was a clause requiring that the bar continue to operate without the subwoofers, and that the city inspect the soundproofing that the owners say was installed in the ceiling.
Police also aim to ensure that music can’t be heard at a distance greater than 50 feet away from the establishment.
Noozhawk staff writer Rob Kuznia can be reached at rkuznia@noozhawk.com.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.
- No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
- No vulgar or discriminatory language.
- If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
- Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
- Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
- Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.
Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.
» on 09.17.08 @ 05:39 PM
Rob Kuznia,
Can you tell us how long the Holiday Inn Express and the current Hotel Santa Barbara has been in opertation? I’m just curious if the hotels came after the bar.
» on 09.19.08 @ 10:02 AM
I am very pleased with the councils decision to honor Madisons with a dance permit. Dancing in Madisons is great. People can eat and drink and move around and celebrate life. That’s what has brought SANTA BARBARA IT’S GREAT REPUTATION. Bars settings seem to bring more trouble. How can a person just go into a place where there is good music playing and relax with a drink and forget lifes negitives by just drinking and sitting? Dancing is a way to express yourself and let yourself out. Santa Barbara is a fun place to live and we need more dance places with multiculture music. Let’s not blame night clubs on our violence. Violence come’s from negative behaviors and not dancing. In addition, I also feel it’s up to the club owner’s to hire good vigelent security and not just hire big mountains to monitor the doors. Good job on that one Council !!
More Local News »
Donna Joy Thomas Eckert, 1949-2010
The Santa Barbara resident is remembered for her love of family and God
Opposition Builds Over County’s Proposed Construction Agreement
Contractors and others say the agreement, which has yet to be written, would limit the competition for projects and raise costs for taxpayers
Man Sentenced to Prison in Molestation of Niece
German Acosta, convicted in September, will serve 15 years to life
McInnes Delves Into Finances, Other Issues Facing GWD
The Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce hosts the general manager of the Goleta Water District for a roundtable discussion
La Entrada Gets Go-Ahead from City Administrator
In granting approval, Armstrong says new plans conform to previous approvals — but he sets a time line and conditions the developer must follow
Weather: Fair 62.0º
Search Noozhawk »
