Ban on Santa Barbara Pot Shops at Center of Measure T

The city's voters will decide whether to allow storefront dispensaries for medical marijuana

By | Published on 10.04.2010

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Post | View Comments (4)
  • Share
 

Santa Barbara residents will vote on two marijuana-related ballot initiatives this November — one that proposes a ban on citywide medical marijuana dispensaries, and one that proposes legalization of personal possession and cultivation of marijuana.

Measure T would repeal the revised ordinance that allows three permitted medical marijuana dispensaries in the city limits, and instead adopt a ban on any storefront locations for collectives.

A ban on dispensaries has been supported by a range of community groups, prevention and treatment groups, politicians, law enforcement officials, parents and educators — many of the same people who argued against dispensaries throughout the ordinance revision process.

The ballot arguments in favor of the measure are signed by former Mayor Marty Blum, businessman Bob Bryant, Councilman Dale Francisco, Dr. Christopher Flynn, Dr. John Wrench and county Superintendent of Schools Bill Cirone.

The argument centers on the point that banning dispensaries would protect youths and other vulnerable populations, as well as avoiding Santa Barbara’s image as the “pot shop capital of the Central Coast,” as it’s the only city in the Tri-Counties that allows storefront dispensaries.

“Nonprofit collectives growing and distributing marijuana to their seriously ill patients have existed in Santa Barbara for years,” the argument states. “They operate legally today. Measure T won’t change that.”

Opponents of a ban argue that dispensaries are essential for safe access. With a strict ordinance, the city has the ability to regulate dispensaries, unlike collectives operating out of peoples’ homes, and only permitted facilities with legitimate, documented patients are allowed, they say. Seriously ill people often can’t grow their own plants, so a ban would mean patients are “forced to seek marijuana from street dealers,” according to the ballot argument.

Ballot arguments against the measure were signed by Joseph Allen, a former district attorney who has represented multiple dispensary owners, Dr. Steve Hosea of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, former supervisor Frank Frost, former councilmen Gil Garcia and Roger Horton, real estate attorney Rob Egenolf, doctor and breast cancer patient Beverly Brott, and Peggy Jo Love House, a breast cancer patient and wife of Councilman Grant House.

“You cannot support the compassionate use of medical marijuana without supporting a reasonable supply system,” according to the argument.

Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk or @NoozhawkNews.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 10.05.10 @ 06:13 AM

Here are some facts concerning the situation in Holland:

”Cannabis coffee shops” are not only restricted to the Capital of Holland, Amsterdam. They can be found in more than 50 cities and towns across the country. At present, only the retail sale of five grams is tolerated, so production remains criminalized. The mayors of a majority of the cities with coffeeshops have long urged the national government to also decriminalize the supply side.

A poll taken earlier this year indicated that some 50% of the Dutch population thinks cannabis should be fully legalized while only 25% wanted a complete ban. Even though 62% of the voters said they had never taken cannabis. An earlier poll also indicated 80% opposing coffee shop closures.
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2010/02/public_split_on_cannabis_legal.php

It is true that the number of coffee shops has fallen from its peak of around 2,500 throughout the country to around 700 now. The problems, if any, concern mostly “drug tourists” and are largely confined to cities and small towns near the borders with Germany and Belgium. These problems, mostly involve traffic jams, and are the result of cannabis prohibition in neighboring countries. “Public nuisance problems” with the coffee shops are minimal when compared with bars, as is demonstrated by the rarity of calls for the police for problems at coffee shops.

While it is true that lifetime and “past-month” use rates did increase back in the seventies and eighties, the critics shamefully fail to report that there were comparable and larger increases in cannabis use in most, if not all, neighboring countries which continued complete prohibition.

According to the World Health Organization only 19.8 percent of the Dutch have used marijuana, less than half the U.S. figure.
In Holland 9.7% of young adults (aged 15–24) consume soft drugs once a month, comparable to the level in Italy (10.9%) and Germany (9.9%) and less than in the UK (15.8%) and Spain (16.4%). Few transcend to becoming problem drug users (0.44%), well below the average (0.52%) of the compared countries.

The WHO survey of 17 countries finds that the United States has the highest usage rates for nearly all illegal substances.

In the U.S. 42.4 percent admitted having used marijuana. The only other nation that came close was New Zealand, another bastion of get-tough policies, at 41.9 percent. No one else was even close. The results for cocaine use were similar, with the U.S. again leading the world by a large margin.

Even more striking is what the researchers found when they asked young adults when they had started using marijuana. Again, the U.S. led the world, with 20.2 percent trying marijuana by age 15. No other country was even close, and in Holland, just 7 percent used marijuana by 15—roughly one-third of the U.S. figure.
thttp://www.alternet.org/drugs/90295/

In 1998, the US Drug Czar General Barry McCaffrey claimed that the U.S. had less than half the murder rate of the Netherlands. “That’s drugs,” he explained. The Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics immediately issued a special press release explaining that the actual Dutch murder rate is 1.8 per 100,000 people, or less than one-quarter the U.S. murder rate.

Here’s a very recent article by a psychiatrist from Amsterdam, exposing “Drug Czar misinformation”
http://tinyurl.com/247a8mp


Now let’s look at a comparative analysis of the levels of cannabis use in two cities: Amsterdam and San Francisco, which was published in the American Journal of Public Health May 2004,

The San Francisco prevalence survey showed that 39.2% of the population had used cannabis. This is 3 times the prevalence found in the Amsterdam sample

Source: Craig Reinarman, Peter D.A. Cohen and Hendrien L. Kaal, “The Limited Relevance of Drug Policy”
http://www.mapinc.org/lib/limited.pdf

Moreover, 51% of people who had smoked cannabis in San Francisco reported that they were offered heroin, cocaine or amphetamine the last time they purchased cannabis. In contrast, only 15% of Amsterdam residents who had ingested marijuana reported the same conditions. Prohibition is the ‘Gateway Policy’ that forces cannabis seekers to buy from criminals who gladly expose them to harder drugs.

The indicators of death, disease and corruption are even much better in the Netherlands than in Sweden for instance, a country praised by UNODC for its “successful” drug policy.”

Here’s Antonio Maria Costa doing his level best to avoid discussing the success of Dutch drug policy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lExNjEhdSkY&feature=related

The Netherlands also provides heroin on prescription under tight regulation to about 1500 long-term heroin addicts for whom methadone maintenance treatment has failed.
http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/free-heroin-brings-everyone-a-bit-peace

The Dutch justice ministry announced, last year, the closure of eight prisons and cut 1,200 jobs in the prison system. A decline in crime has left many cells empty. There’s simply not enough criminals
http://www.nrc.nl/international/article2246821.ece/Netherlands_to_close_prisons_for_lack_of_criminals

For further information, kindly check out this very informative FAQ provided by Radio Netherlands: http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/faq-soft-drugs-netherlands
or go to this page: http://www.rnw.nl/english/dossier/Soft-drugs

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 10.05.10 @ 09:48 AM

The problem seems to be certain doctors who are taking advantage and giving mm cards to anyone with $200.
I was all for the dispensaries until I met a developmentally disabled teen with a history of DUI’s who was sold a card by a female doc operating out of SB Chicken Ranch.
They are also giving the SBPD too much business. Crooked people are the problem, not the product.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 10.05.10 @ 11:25 AM

malcolmkyle, your data is off. Holland recently outlawed drug tourism to stop drug trafficking out of Holland to other countries in Europe. They also started closing cannabis cafes and passing laws that they can’t be within 800m of schools. They’re moving away from drug tolerance, because the rest of Europe is frustrated over the flow of drugs from Holland to their countries. And you want us to go in the very direction Holland is moving away from? Wake up1

You have already flagged this entry.

» on 03.11.11 @ 05:07 PM

The ban really makes sense.  Lets make it so that people have to talk to “street vendors” again.  Lets make sure that the drug cartels that supply those people are getting their cut.  Why would we want to make it so there are enforced restrictions on where and who can buy this product.  Lets take away their ability to do it in a safe, comfortable manor and lets make them talk to people who will try and sell people more then just Marijuana.  Lets make sure that they have to talk to people who also sell crack, meth, and heroin (which is why marijuana is considered a “gateway drug”) Its a great idea that will help our youth.  Because instead of them needing proper documentation to buy it all they will need is cash.  Street dealers do not check I.D.s they do not care how old a customer is, they do not care if the person actually needs the medicine to improve their way of life.  All they want is the money and this would put that money right back into their pockets.  Supply and demand. You take away someones ability to legally buy a product and they will find ways to buy it illegally.  Prohibition has always worked so well.  How about we just set regulations and actually enforce them.  I know crazy concept.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Authorities Locate SBCC Student Reported Missing

His mother had asked for the public's help finding her 20-year-old 'special needs' son

Red Flag Warning Canceled; Wind Advisory Still in Effect

Sunny skies are expected to give way to some clouds over the weekend

Santa Barbara Breaks Record With High of 86 Degrees

Previous mark for May 23 was 82, set in 1949, according to the National Weather Service

Santa Maria Man Facing Child Molestation Charges

Victim reports being sexually abused over a period of time by the suspect

Police Seek Public’s Help Identifying Suspect in Retail Thefts

Surveillance photo shows person wanted in connection with thefts at two Santa Barbara stores

Weather: A Few Clouds 52.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive