Goleta City Council Approves General Plan Amendments

The vote comes after the council and the public tackle changes on stream-side buffers and setbacks

By Sonia Fernandez, Noozhawk Staff Writer | Published on 11.18.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (4)
    • Share

Stream-side buffers and setbacks were the main theme of the Goleta City Council’s discussion Tuesday evening on General Plan amendments. The council ultimately voted to approve the amendments, deemed by some to be less protective than the original policies.

The decision came after council members and the public grappled for a while over proposed changes to the city’s planning policies on Goleta’s riparian areas.

Several watersheds originate at the foothills north of Goleta, with many creeks and tributaries flowing south across the city to the Goleta Slough and the ocean. Original rules for future development along these areas drew the line at 100 feet from the top of the bank and took it down to a 50-foot minimum if there was existing development, while the amendment held to a 100-foot guideline in all areas that could be taken down to as little as 25 feet, depending on the individual site’s circumstances and the results.

By far, the majority of the public that weighed in on the topic Tuesday evening advocated a 100-foot minimum buffer, urging the council to hold fast to that guideline.

“As a scientist, I support consistent 100-foot creek and wetland setbacks, because they are supported by firm scientific evidence,” UCSB ecology professor Scott Cooper said.

“Channelkeeper is, of course, concerned that the city’s proposed reductions to existing creek setbacks will make it harder for the community to achieve its water-quality goals,” said Ben Pitterle of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper.

Among those who were vocal about their opposition to a large buffer zone were people with property in Old Town Goleta, where projects have been developed up to the banks of the creeks that flow through that urbanized area.

“One size definitely does not fit all; flexibility is required based on circumstances,” said Peter Brown, representing a client who owns property abutting Old San Jose Creek in Old Town. The 100-foot setback rules without flexibility would give his client little more than a bowling lane’s width to work with, he said.

To put a little perspective on the situation, Planning and Environmental Services Director Steve Chase reminded the council that the actual new developments the streamside protection rules would affect would amount to less than 2 percent of undeveloped land left in the city. “Not much left,” he said.

Furthermore, Chase said, there are threshold tests and others that are part of the city’s determination as to how close a development can come to a creek’s bank. Existing development that encroaches upon the setback would be listed as nonconforming, but not be required to move. However, extensions of existing development or rebuilt projects may come under Planning and Development scrutiny.

The rest of the General Plan amendment recommendations made by the city Planning Commission and planning staff were approved relatively quickly by the City Council, including the drafting of a new element dealing with greenhouse gas emissions. The council voted 4-0 (Councilman Ed Easton abstaining) to certify the amendments and the accompanying environmental documents for what has become known as the Track 3 Amendments.

However, the city hasn’t seen the end of the General Plan amendment process for this year.

Councilman Eric Onnen, speaking for small-business owners such as himself who have property in Old Town, suggested a change in the General Plan’s policy to deal with the double jeopardy that occurs when a property owner mitigates creekside property as part of a development, only to create another environmentally sensitive habitat area that would require another buffer zone.

That sole amendment is expected to return to the council for initiation before the end of 2009.

— Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Comments (4)

Post a Comment

Ground Rules for Posting Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.
  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, we will remove your comment.
Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Name:

» counting wrote on 11.19.09 @ 11:13 AM

La plus ca change, la plus c’est la meme chose. Goletans elected Connell and Easton to reverse the tide of General Plan changes, the amendments upon amendments, and what do they get, more of the same! (An abstention on this important question is bizarre!) Voters should keep that in mind in the next council election: it’s not what they, the incumbents, say, it’s how they voted. But it apparently doesn’t matter who you vote for, development and growth and sympathy for the builders and not the environment is what you’ll get.

» Easton? wrote on 11.20.09 @ 08:02 AM

i didn’t watch the hearing but will catch one of the replays. But what was Easton thinking?  Why did he abstain?  Since when do we elect someone on an allegedly “environmental” platform only to have him ABSTAIN on one of the most important votes of his term.  Next time I see him—and I expect to soon——he will have lots of ‘splainin to do.

» Elections have consequences? wrote on 11.20.09 @ 03:47 PM

There will be another election for three seats on the Goleta City Council in less than one year…

» Silly wrote on 11.21.09 @ 12:14 PM

What a bunch of gobbly goop.

 

More Local News »

Supervisors Face Grim Budget Picture, Rising Benefit Costs

The governor's proposed budget and other fiscal challenges — including county staffing, salaries and retirement — will top the agenda Tuesday

Hotel Developer Aims to Trim Extended Stay with Goleta Design Review

Planning board will size up latest version of previously pared Marriott Residence Inn project

‘Spirit of the Ocean’ Rock Party a Rain and Shine Event

Two boulders at La Patera Ranch will be carved into a replica of the famous courthouse fountain

Judge Upholds Life Sentence for Jesse James Hollywood

The defense's motion for a new trial is denied in the kidnap-murder of Nicholas Markowitz

Former News-Press Editor Jerry Roberts Wins Arbitration Award

Court documents show owner/publisher Wendy McCaw has been ordered to $1 million in legal fees and arbitration costs

Weather: Overcast 50.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive