- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Politics
- School Zone
- Youth Camps
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Supporters Study Funding Options for SBCC Adult Education

Instead of complaining about state cuts or succumbing to apathy, dozens of adult-education supporters gathered Friday to provide input on the challenges facing the popular SBCC program.
SBCC’s Continuing Ed program, formed in 1918, now has more than 22,000 students and a plethora of programming. But the department also has been the victim of massive state cuts to higher education and has a $500,000 deficit between what it needs to operate for the year and what the state, fees and other costs will cover.
More than 100 people attended the forum at the Wake Center Auditorium on Friday afternoon, and small groups were formed among attendees to brainstorm how supporters of the program could address the budget problems.
Groups of a dozen or so gathered around tables and pads of paper to discuss what they value about the program, suggestions about what they could do to operate independent of state funding, and what they as individuals could offer to help.
Santa Barbara City Councilman Grant House led a group of 10 people in a discussion. SBCC President Andreea Serban also sat in and listened to suggestions.
When group members were asked what they value about the program, it quickly became clear that the benefits were not only about education.
“It got me out of the house and back into mainstream society,” student Steve Clark said. “It took me out of a deep depression.”
Student Audrey Harmon agreed. “It gives elderly people a reason to live,” she said.
A lineup of teachers, administrators and supporters of the program were part of the forum and spoke before the group sessions began.

House, the first to speak, talked about how he took a class after being laid off from a job in 1977, and that the class helped him learn skills he needed to start his own business, Grant House Sewing Machines.
“I’m grateful for that,” he said. “Adult ed is worth doing the work for.”
Serban said the college is looking for long-term solutions that are independent of state funding. She cited a report released two days ago that said it could take as long as the 2014-15 school year for funding to be fully restored. “We are in this situation for the long term,” she said.
Drawing on outside resources also would be key to the school’s programming. “We really need to ensure that the symbiotic relationship between the college and the community is alive,” she said.
Norm Hendry is a continuing-ed ceramics teacher who has been with the program since 1978. “The recent loss of 100 classes was a wake-up call,” he said. “The gravy days of funding are over. ... We have to pick up the slack.”
One of the ways his ceramics class will try to pitch in is by hosting a pottery show and sale Dec. 5, in which all of the proceeds will go back into adult ed. The sale will be from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at 437 Mountain Drive, and the community can expect to see more of this type of fundraising in the future.
— Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.
- No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
- No vulgar or discriminatory language.
- If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
- Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
- Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
- Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.
Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.
» on 11.20.09 @ 10:14 PM
Several years ago the organization that I work for tried to form a coalition with Adult Ed. that would have provided them with a very deep and basically never ending stream of students (read funding) and we were repeatedly given the cold shoulder. Maybe we will try again, but to be honest, I am very reluctant to deal with that tangled, elitist bureaucracy again.
» on 11.21.09 @ 12:58 AM
I’ve heard, and I concur, that most of us would pay a small fee for these classes (I know some classes have some fees but I’m talking categorically.) Adult Ed is a great resource and if we have a pay a little to keep it going, so be it. Welcome the the New World.
» on 11.21.09 @ 08:05 AM
I’ve always been amazed at the negligible cost of taking an adult ed class. If 22,000 students each paid $25 for a class instead of $3.00, it would go a long way toward offsetting the shortfall—almost all the way, in fact.
» on 11.21.09 @ 08:35 AM
22,000 students pay $2.50 a month = $30 per year = $660,000 per year. Funding crisis over.
Having Grant House suggest ways to ‘save’ anything is like having the fox guard the henhouse.
» on 11.21.09 @ 10:09 AM
The tangled web of administration is part of the fiscal problem that Adult Ed is now facing. Maybe there should be term limists for the administrative positions. Anyone who dares to look at the underside of the beast sees administrators imposing levels upon levels of requirements and rules that ensures their own longevity in their positions. Teachers and students have complained about these administrators and yet they continue in their positions. Look at the last 12 months of hiring. Look at their salaries. Look at the cars they drive. These are the same people who sat down and told their underlings to eliminate 100 classes. They are still telling us that they may eliminate 100 more. The teachers and students who remain in the system can certainly put their hands to the plow but look at the bloated administration and what they are being paid and how many of them are simply trying to protect their own positions. Let THEM at take at least a 30% pay cut. Maybe that is expecting too much of them. Many are just highly educated. They feel “entitled”. They drive their BMWs, Lexus, Volvos to meetings with teachers and students who have no health care, who are on unemployment and are being denied education. The higher ups in the administration know who the bad apples are but they are fearful of reprisal if they try to remove those bad apples. They should put away fear, clean house at the top and take charge. Chip away at the public perception that the administrators are taking care of themselves FIRST,and only then the teachers and students. After that is done, then make the teachers, students and community struggle to make up the fiscal short falls. The administrators should first be teachers and lead by example in these tough times and then they will deserve the expensive suits, really nice cars and seats of honor.
» on 11.21.09 @ 01:24 PM
I wish these adults were as concerned about the public education of SB elementary and high school students as they are about their ceramics classes. I love Adult Ed…but it should be self-supporting and the tax monies should be spent on educating our next generation of Californians.
» on 11.21.09 @ 02:04 PM
How about just charging students what it actually costs? If it’s a worth it to them, they will pay. Why does everything have to be subsidized by the taxpayer??
» on 11.21.09 @ 05:08 PM
I agree with the previous poster. It is insane to ask the taxpayers to support adult ed when we cannot even cover the costs of children’s education. I suggest dismantling the whole adult ed system and replacing it with a private sector student financed adult ed system (and we can replace the public sector administrators with more efficient private sector ones).
» on 11.21.09 @ 05:08 PM
I attended this meeting, which was very open, very positive, very creative. Intros were very brief. Then everyone had a chance to brainstorm and give input in small groups.
Contrast that with tv images of UC’s regents meeting surrounded by a small army of
bodyguards.
City College still operates very close to the grassroots level. Thank goodness.
The current financial challenge could not be resolved by “SBres” past offer. The issue wasn’t a lack of new students.
Many local courses are not State-funded. Many other courses are re-imbursed by the State, but don’t cover the actual cost of holding them.
Just bringing in a lot more course takers (at current rates) makes those deficits larger, not smaller.
Grant House is on the Adult Ed Advisory Committee. His remarks covered how vital
Adult Ed classes were to helping him start his business. Later, he acted as a small-group facilitator/recorder. He did a solid, nonpartisan job.
There’s a misperception (“SB Frank”) that executives at SBCC, Adult Ed, or UCSB,
are rich Bozos with swanky cars who clip coupons and work “banker’s hours”.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The gigantic, unpaid overtime hours these people have put in to meet multiple waves of state funding disasters has been heroic. They just don’t brag about it.
California has been starving education for years. Like the weather, everyone in Sacramento talks about it, but no one does anything.
The battle to keep classes open, affordable for a wide range of students, and to retain dedicated faculty and staff to operate them, is titanic.
The lights often burn late at Cheadle Hall and SBCC, long after reporters have gone
home or gone to bed.
Karen Engberg and “22,000 students” are both right. Fees, donations, tuition, for
$500,000 more per year could stabilize the Adult Ed system, and help buffer it from
Sacramento’s dysfunction . Definitely worth looking at.
» on 11.22.09 @ 07:47 AM
Even though they seem to be at opposite ends, both SB Frank and Lee Moldaver have it mostly right.
If the top 5 positions at Adult Ed took even a 10% pay cut, that is a substantial amount of money, over $30,000. Instead, they don’t rehire “part-time, temporary” instructors at $1,000 - $3,000 a TERM. Yes, most of them are working hard in tough financial times. So besides working harder, which teachers and staff been doing by having more students with less help, why hasn’t a pay cut of the Pres, VP and Directors taken place??? Even $5%! Step up to the plate, administrators!
As to students paying “a little” instead of “free”, this suggestion demonstrates the lack of leadership that Adult Ed has right now. It’s a good idea that has been suggested for YEARS. But the public needs to be educated about how the money comes in and why some classes don’t/can’t have a charge. These things should have been addressed months ago so that people would understand the state funding process better. This is not a private institution where the CEO can just make decisions because “(s)he’s the boss”.
I agree that each state-funded class request a donation. FYI, it would have to be a “donation” because state-funded classes can’t charge anything but exactly what the materials, if any, would cost for the class. That said, until the administration demonstrates better leadership, ie, more inclusive decision-making, collaboration with instructors and staff, creative solutions, etc, I wouldn’t ask for money now as a teacher and I wouldn’t give any at this time as a student.
» on 11.22.09 @ 10:43 AM
Lee Moldaver adresses the observations I have shared with the following:
“There’s a misperception (“SB Frank”) that executives at SBCC, Adult Ed, or UCSB, are rich Bozos with swanky cars who clip coupons and work “banker’s hours”.”
I believe this to be a trite and shallow response to a substantive problem. His comments about clipping coupons and banker’s hours did not come from me. His comments missed the core of the problem. I do know that many of the administrators work long hours. The point is that much of what they are doing is “make work.” Much of what they do is NOT VALUE ADDING to the goals of Adult Ed. Many work long hours to comply with redundant regulations and layers upon layers of meaningless requirements. The administration and the members of their buddy system do not want to address this problem. Their only feeble answer to those who care enough to question them is “Look at how many hours they work.” LOOK at what THEY ARE DOING and who told them to do it !!
» on 11.22.09 @ 12:08 PM
What if a shorter class time is considered, 6 weeks not 8 weeks or 4 weeks not 6 weeks. Could we keep the classes we have now?
» on 11.23.09 @ 11:11 AM
My suggestion is to tap into the power of modern vieoconferencing which is now very cheap.
It would be ideal fir adult education. The classes could be taught right in the home over the internet. Now we can do multipoint which means you can have 10 to 20 students online at the same time and you can see and hear each other just like in regular classroom. See my web page http://www.virtualbusinessmeetings.com. Send me an email and I will explain further. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
» on 11.23.09 @ 12:39 PM
Nice idea john lynch, but it ignores the fact that a lot of people enjoy the social aspects of the classes. It may even be their only reason for taking them. People spend enough time at computers and probably take classes so that they can get off their ends, stretch, and interact with actual humans in a primitive environment.
» on 11.23.09 @ 05:19 PM
Nice idea John Lynch, but at the very least, 10% of the students in Adult Education do not own a computer. So, maybe your idea would work for those who can afford internet access and own a computer. Something quite different would have to be provided for the growing number of the less fortunate, those who are less education and yet most in need.
More Local News »
Santa Barbara Airbus Picks Up and Moves to New Location
The company will have more legroom at its new home on Technology Way in Goleta
Residents Get Look at Master Plan for Santa Barbara
An open house kicks off a public-comment period designed to help shape the future of the city
Ninth Circuit Court to Rehear Goleta Rent-Control Case
The appeal on 'regulatory taking' could determine the constitutionality of the city's ordinance
Bob Wilcher: Guaranteed Weight Loss
Eat 500 fewer calories and exercise for one hour each day and enjoy the results
Santa Barbara Developer Fess Parker Dies at Age 85
The local actor was also the namesake of Fess Parker DoubleTree Resort and Fess Parker Winery
Weather: Fair 60.0º
Search Noozhawk »


