Robert Scheer: Wall Street Hustlers See an Easy Mark

Despite promises of change, Obama's slyly lining up the same old foxes to guard our financial henhouse.

By Robert Scheer | Published on 11.28.2008

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (2)
    • Share

Maybe Ralph Nader was right in predicting that the same Wall Street hustlers would have a lock on our government no matter which major party won the election. I hate to admit it, since it wasn’t that long ago that I heatedly challenged Nader in a debate on this very point.

Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
But how else is one to respond to President-elect Barack Obama’s picking the very folks who helped get us into this financial mess to now lead us out of it? Watching Obama’s introduction of his economic team Monday, my brother-in-law, Pete, said, “You can see the feathers coming out of their mouths,” as the foxes were once again put in charge of the henhouse.

He didn’t have time to expound on his point, having to get ready to go sort mail in his job at the post office, but he showed me a statement from Citigroup showing that the interest rate on Pete the Postal Worker’s credit card was 28.9 percent, an amount that all major religions would justly condemn as usurious.

Moments earlier, Obama had put his seal of approval on the Citigroup bailout, which his new economic team, led by proteges of Citigroup executive committee chairman Robert Rubin, enthusiastically endorsed. A bailout that brings to $45 billion the taxpayer money thrown at Citigroup and the guarantee of $306 billion for the bank’s “toxic securities” that would have been illegal if not for changes in the law that Citigroup secured with the decisive help of Rubin and Lawrence Summers, the man who replaced him as treasury secretary in the Clinton administration.

As Summers stayed on to ensure passage of deregulatory laws that enabled enormous banking greed, Rubin was rewarded with a $15-million-a-year executive position at Citigroup, a job that only got more lucrative as the bank went from one disaster, beginning with its involvement with Enron in which Rubin played an active role, to its huge role in the mortgage debacle. It is widely acknowledged that Citigroup fell victim to a merger mania, which Rubin and Summers made legal during their tenure at Treasury.

Yet despite that dismal record of dismantling sound regulation, Summers has been picked by Obama to be the top White House economic adviser, and another Rubin disciple, Timothy Geithner, is the new treasury secretary. Geithner, thanks in part to the strong recommendation of Rubin, had been appointed chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank after working for Rubin and Summers during the Clinton years. Once at the New York Fed, he was the main government official charged with regulating Citigroup, a task at which he obviously failed. Yet over the weekend, it was Geithner who hammered out the Citigroup bailout deal with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and a very actively involved Rubin.

As The Washington Post reported, Paulson had indicated last week that no further bailouts were planned before the new administration took office until “Rubin, an old colleague from Goldman Sachs, told Paulson in phone calls that the government had to act.” Rubin conceded in an interview with the Post that he had played a key role in the politics of the bailout.

This outrageous conflict of interest in which Rubin gets to exploit his ties to both the outgoing and incoming administrations was best described by Washington Post writer Steven Pearlstein: “The ultimate irony, of course, is that just as Rubin and Co. at Citi were being bailed out by the Bush administration, President-elect Barack Obama was getting set to announce a new economic team drawn almost entirely from Rubin acolytes.”

As opposed to the far tougher deal negotiated on the bailout of AIG, the arrangement with Citigroup leaves the executives, including Rubin, who brought Citigroup to the brink of ruin, still in charge. Nor is there any guarantee of the value of the mortgage bundles that taxpayers will be guaranteeing. That is because, as candidate Obama clearly stated in his major economics address back in March, the deregulation pushed though during the Clinton years ended transparency in banking.

Why then has Obama appointed the very people responsible for this disaster to now make it all better? Why not ask him? Heck, yes, it is time for the many of us who responded to his e-mails during the campaign to now challenge our e-mail buddy as to why he suddenly acts as if the interests of Wall Street and Main Street are one and the same.

TruthDig.com editor in chief Robert Scheer‘s new book is The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America. Click here for more information. He can be reached at rscheer@truthdig.com.

Comments (2)

Post a Comment

(Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.)

Name:

» Regular reader wrote on 11.29.08 @ 04:46 PM

Is Mr. Scheer just now realizing that Senator Obama wasn’t “the most liberal member of the Senate” (as regularly tagged by Karl Rove’s minions) but a bright, thoughtful political centrist, who’s trying to forge a bi-partisan coalition to solve our enormous financial, economic, military, and foreign policy challenges (the legacy of eight long years of Bush-Cheney-Rove-Rumsfeld)?

As conservative intellectual David Brooks recently noted, “Obama in picking EVERY
major economist he can find to advise him ... they’re all stellar in their fields. God
only knows what he will do when, for instance, former Fed chair Paul Volcker and
former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers each come in to see him, and ... totally disagree with each other?”

A major national newsaper interviewed Citibank’s Robert Rubin this week about what HIS role was in Citibank’s meltdown and bailout? Rubin seems to be taking the “Enron/Ken Lay defense” (i.e. Yes, he was a high paid senior executive, but hey, he was ALSO totally out of the loop when ALL the disastrous big investment decisions were made, AND when all the chickens came home to roost). Is that why Obama did NOT name him to a top post, huh?

» John Douglas wrote on 12.02.08 @ 11:57 AM

Time to let President-elect Obama know what we think about his cabinet picks, etc. http://change.gov/page/s/yourvision. Hopefully someone in the Obama transition team is looking at the emails, or at least tabulating them.

 

More Local News »

Where to Go, What to Do for a Fourth-Filled Weekend

The weather may be just right for Independence Day festivities, with warm temperatures and low humidity expected through the weekend

Local Banks Will Accept State IOUs from Customers

But many set a July 10 cutoff to redeem the paper in an attempt to pressure Sacramento

Palin Adds to Buzz at Santa Barbara Tea Party Rally

Alaska governor's surprise resignation fuels speculation at De la Guerra Plaza tax protest

Santa Barbara County Not Expecting to Issue IOUs

As California grapples with its budget crisis, Auditor-Controller Robert Geis says the county has maintained a 'pretty strong cash flow'

Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce Relocates … Online

Recession pressure and high-tech solutions point the way to a virtual office for the 63-year-old business group

Weather: Fog/Mist 59.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2009 | ISSN No. 1947-6086