- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Haskell’s Landing Tied Up in Goleta Planning Commission
[Note: The in-lieu fees for ten affordable units required by the city’s inclusionary policy total $806,500. An earlier version of this story was incorrect.]
After a grueling hearing Monday, the Goleta Planning Commission deadlocked 2-2 on a vote to approve Haskell’s Landing, a residential project in western Goleta. Commissioners Brent Daniels and Doris Kavanagh voted for the proposal, Commissioners Bill Shelor and Jonny Wallis voted against it, and Commissioner Julie Solomon was not present.
Because of the tie vote, applicant Chuck Lande of the Oly Chadmar Sandpiper General Partnership will be bringing his case before the City Council in the near future.
Haskell’s Landing is a 100-unit project proposed just north of Sandpiper Golf Course, south of Highway 101 and the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. It is the latest incarnation of a series of proposals for residential projects in that roughly 14.5-acre lot, the most recent of which was Residences at Sandpiper, which was the subject of a fierce legal battle between the applicant and Goleta’s charter City Council.
Kavanagh praised the project, however.
“I think this project fits the spot well,” she said. The project contains a range of housing styles from studios to three-bedroom units in what the architects are calling “California style.” The roughly 60-to-40 ratio of open space to built space, and the proposed green-building elements in the duplexes and triplexes were also attractive elements for her.
A big selling point for the project was the developer’s commitment of $1.5 million for a new fire station that would served the traditionally underserved western end of Goleta. The city has already begun the process of acquiring land for the facility.
Opinions were about evenly divided among the public in the hearing room. Environmentalists urged the commission to keep the current 100-foot creek buffer zone rule, while other community members argued that the work the developer proposes to do would improve the creek over and above its current state.
Meanwhile, others were concerned about the developer’s plan to include only 10 affordable units while paying in-lieu fees — about $80,000 per unit for 10 units — to compensate for the 20 percent affordable requirement that new housing projects in Goleta are supposed to have.
Those concerns were countered by the notion from the project’s supporters that housing could never be truly affordable in the area anyway, and that what was really needed were the kinds of housing this project offered.
“It’s a project we need in the area,” said resident Robert Rice.
Resident George Relles, meanwhile, expressed his discomfort with a “late-hit” memo that was distributed Monday on the project. He said the public had limited time to go over the lengthy document.
“There’s no reason to take action today,” said Relles, who urged the commission to wait until the General Plan could be used as a guideline instead of changing a policy for the project, and for the rest of the city.
With Solomon’s absence, the panel was at a stalemate and the applicant requested a denial so he could take the project to the City Council, in hopes it will overturn the Planning Commission’s decision.
Write to sfernandez@noozhawk.com
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 02.10.09 @ 07:09 AM
clearly the meeting was dominated by those in support - never seen much like it as I watched on tv last night. of course the regulars were there but dominated by unlikely people in favor of more housing on this property between the freeway, Hollister, a parking lot - it is in the middle of development.
and BTW the affordable fees are more than $800,000, not $80,000.
and the normal fire fees would be around $70,000 and the property owners are providing $1.5 million.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 02.10.09 @ 10:32 AM
Birds live here; creek 100? 1000!; in-lieu-of-reality fees - just that! True not affordable, and those just over the limit doubly screwed. Higher rent when only sllightly more salary. No on will buy in this economy, and the shells will fill with the bums from the Santa Barbara Amtrak Oak.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 02.11.09 @ 10:58 AM
Birds live here; creek 100? 1000!; in-lieu-of-reality fees - just that! True not affordable, and those just over the limit doubly screwed. Higher rent when only sllightly more salary. No on will buy in this economy, and the shells will fill with the bums from the Santa Barbara Amtrak Oak.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
SBCC Receives But Won’t Release Draft of Findings from State Oversight Commission
The college has 30 days to respond, after which the ACCJC is expected to issue a public decision
County Supervisors Approve First Reading of Oil Pipeline Agreement for Venoco
Next week's public meeting the last step before the company can begin operations
Goleta Seeks Public Input on Law Enforcement Services
Participants are needed for two focus groups scheduled for Feb. 15
City Council Authorizes Design Contract for Redevelopment of Cliff Drive Intersection
Tuesday's meeting is dedicated to Santa Barbara filmmaker Mike deGruy, who died in a helicopter crash; a memorial service is planned for Sunday
Goleta Woman Accused of Having Sex with Teen Boy
Sheriff's Department says victim recently came forward about 2008 relationship
Weather: Fair 54.0º
Search Noozhawk »
