City Subcommittee Lays Groundwork for Policies on Homelessness

Proposals include a panhandling ban, and possibly adding a foot-patrol officer in downtown Santa Barbara.

By | Published on 12.18.2008

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Post | View Comments (4)
  • Share
 

The city’s homeless subcommittee is putting together a raft of proposed policies for addressing homelessness in Santa Barbara. The ideas range from reining in aggressive panhandling to providing more beds for the city’s homeless.

Specifically, the proposals include outlawing verbal panhandling — legally referred to as “soliciting” — near certain areas, such as ATMs, bus stops, outdoor restaurants and admission lines.

They also may include adding at least one foot-patrol officer and several social workers to the downtown streets, increasing the overnight capacity at the Casa Esperanza Homeless Shelter and curbing the amount of intoxication in the lower Milpas Street area.

The subcommittee, which is made up of three City Council members, met Thursday mostly for the purpose of allowing the public to chime in on the draft proposal before it is fine-tuned next month. In February, it will be brought to the full seven-member City Council for possible adoption.

In general, subcommittee members Iya Falcone, Helene Schneider and Dale Francisco said they are striving to tackle the thorny issue in a balanced way, by cracking down on unacceptable behavior while extending a compassionate hand to those in need.

Thursday’s meeting drew a crowd of about 30 people, some of them business owners with a stake in trying to rein in aggressive panhandling, and some of them homeless advocates with an interest in ensuring that the vulnerable population is treated with dignity.

With a few exceptions, most parties seemed satisfied with the draft of proposals, but there were some disagreements.

One centered on whether to expand Casa Esperanza’s overnight shelter. On this, two officials on homelessness clashed, with Roger Heroux—chair of the county’s 10-Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness—in favor of it and Casa Esperanza board member John Dixon opposed to it.

Half of the shelter’s 200 beds sit empty during the year’s nine nonwinter months, because of conditions of approval placed upon the facility by the city Planning Commission to appease neighbors who opposed the project before it was built in the late 1990s.

Heroux asserted that at least some of those beds should be opened up to serve the more vulnerable members of the homeless population, noting that the number of homeless seniors, children and women is rising dramatically nationwide.

“The last four nights, our temperatures have been in the 30s,” said Heroux, who is also the executive director of a relatively new organization called Bringing Our Community Home, which is responsible for coordinating the county’s 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness. “How can we even tolerate people who have hearts, minds, bodies and souls — allow these individuals, as vulnerable as they are — to live on the streets of Santa Barbara?”

Casa Esperanza Executive Director Mike Foley added that he and his staff may request increasing the number of available beds to 140 from 100 during the nonwinter months, to serve only the most vulnerable members of the homeless population, such as women and people with disabilities.

However, Dixon, owner of Tri County Produce, noted that his business and others in the lower Milpas Street area already have experienced a serious increase in traffic since the shelter opened. Opening up more beds, he said, would exacerbate that trend.

“Good old-fashioned policing is really what’s needed, and we also need more of it,” he said. “Police presence on State Street and Milpas.”

In general, business people said they, too, want to see homeless people treated with compassion, but also want to see aggressive panhandlers and other homeless people who act out dealt with appropriately.

To that end, the Santa Barbara Downtown Organization has offered to pay half of the estimated $90,000 cost for a part-time retired police officer.

Kathy Janega-Dykes, president and CEO of the Santa Barbara Conference & Visitors Bureau, reminded the committee that tourism in the county is a $1.4 billion industry.

“We promote Santa Barbara as a resort destination that is clean, that is green, that is safe and enjoyable, and aggressive panhandling contradicts that image in every way,” she said. “These recommendations are truly well-rounded, and they are designed to also protect our economy.”

Meanwhile, city attorney Steve Wiley pointed out that the proposed restrictions on panhandling would not apply to people holding up signs, which is constitutionally protected activity. For this reason, the proposal refers to the ban-able practices as “soliciting,” which essentially amounts to verbal panhandling.

In addition to banning the practice near ATMs, bus stops and outdoor restaurants, the policy also would outlaw the activity within parking structures and while sitting on downtown city benches.

There is also a proposal to create a “recovery zone” on lower Milpas Street. It would happen with an eye toward curtailing the high levels of drinking and drug use in the area, for the benefit of recovering addicts.

Under the proposal, the zone would include nearly everything on Milpas Street and some surrounding neighborhoods south of Highway 101. There, anyone who has been arrested for selling drugs in the area would be prohibited from returning until the completion of his or her probation period. Also, merchants who engage in the illegal practice of selling booze to intoxicated customers would be more closely monitored.

The idea, Milpas Action Task Force member Gary Linker has said, is to chip away at an unfortunate irony: The shelter attempting to help so many drug addicts is surrounded by drug pushers, most noticeably at a nearby labor line, where unemployed men wait around all day for on-the-spot construction work.

Write to rkuznia@noozhawk.com.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 12.19.08 @ 07:41 AM

no pan-handling in certain areas, isn’t it against the law everywhere you ...... the law is the law. Do us people with money get a break or just tickets to give to people who choose to beg. Get a clue!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 12.19.08 @ 07:44 AM

outlaw the labor line, make these people get real jobs and pay real taxes, business owners as well. Don’t you see this is where it all begins!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 12.19.08 @ 10:09 AM

Good story! And good for the Downtown Org. willing to pay $45K for a part-time police officer, but I am shocked that a part-time officer would cost $90,000!

As for the location, how about having some of the beds, some of the shelter be in another part of town? Share the problems, so to speak, away from the labor line, as well as not making the Milpas area be the sole magnet? It’s unfair to the store owners as well as to those of us who live and shop in that area.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 12.22.08 @ 02:37 PM

The problem with the 10 yr homeless plan draft is that it does not distinguish between truly needy SANTA BARBARA homeless people and transients. I’m all for supporting and helping the former, but the later need to be discouraged from coming to SB. Unfortunately SB is making itself more and more attractive to them.

Word has most likely gotten around that SB is a beautiful place to go and that there is free food, lots of parks to sleep in, and many opportunities for panhandling. ENOUGH ALEADY! Let’s help the SB homeless, not the other “homeless people”* who, in the draft, are lumped into the same group with the SANTA BARBARA homeless.

If you also feel that the plan needs to address how SB should deal specifically with these two different groups, please let these council members, who are on the “Subcommittee on Homelessness and Community Relations”, know:

Iya Falcone, Chairman, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) Dale Francisco, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) Helene Schneider, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Also, please copy .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Notes:

* With my apologies to the extremely politically-correct, I’d like to point out that historically this group was referred to as bums, hobos, transients, and vagrants.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Approval from Santa Barbara County Supervisors the Last Step for Venoco’s New Pipeline

The board will consider an ordinance allowing the company to begin transporting oil via a pipeline that has already been built, instead of by barge

Pacific Storm Expected to Bring Rain, Wind Back to Santa Barbara County on Tuesday

Weather officials say South Coast could receive up to 1½ inches of rain with wind gusting to 30 mph

Santa Barbara-Goleta-Montecito Open House Listings: Feb. 5, 2012

Coldwell Banker, Prudential and Sotheby's post Sunday open house listings

Open House Listings: Feb. 4 & Feb. 5, 2012

Weekend open house listings for Santa Barbara, Goleta, Montecito, Carpinteria and Santa Barbara County

Big-Rig Driver Killed in Highway 101 Crash Was Under the Influence of Meth, Officials Say

The tractor-trailer struck a sedan, trapping a woman and her young daughters inside the vehicle as it dangled over a bridge railing

Weather: Overcast 58.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive