Mark Shields: Obama Passes ‘The Dover Test’

The reality of war becomes more transparent as the president personally consoles the families of fallen soldiers as they are returned to U.S. soil

By | Published on 10.31.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (5)
  • Share

Former Sen. John Glenn, D-Ohio, who as a Marine pilot had flown 59 combat missions during World War II and an additional 90 missions in Korea — where in air-to-air combat during that war’s last nine days alone he had shot down three Soviet MiG fighter planes — knew firsthand the suffering of war. So the plain words Glenn spoke in the Senate on Jan. 22, 1997, about what he called “the Dover test” are worth recalling: “It’s easy to see the flags flying and the people go off to war, and the bands play and the flags fly. And it’s not quite so easy when the flag is draped over a coffin coming back through Dover, Delaware.”

Mark Shields
Mark Shields

Waiting until after midnight to leave the White House, President Barack Obama traveled to Delaware, and there in the pre-dawn darkness on Oct. 29, 2009, he personally took “the Dover test.”

The most momentous of national decisions — to send U.S. citizens into combat — ought to first be subjected to the Dover test, which according to retired Gen. Hugh Shelton, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, begins with whether “the American public (is) prepared for the sight of our most precious resource coming home in flag-draped caskets.”

The scene, so familiar to older generations, where the military pallbearers in their white gloves so respectfully carry the caskets bearing the human remains of the fallen — and where the families and loved ones mourned, but were also comforted by the ceremonial care — had been banned from public view since 1991 until the Obama administration changed the policy to allow families to decide whether the solemn occasion could be covered by the media.

The scene at Dover is no ordinary picture. No, Dover is truly the portrait of sacrifice and of human loss. Statistics do not bleed. Real sons and real fathers — and, yes, real sisters — bleed. And they die. However any of us might feel about the wisdom of the decision to go to war or of how that war has been waged, all of us need to appreciate — and to share — the grief and pain of the human cost of war.

The president of the United States is not just the commander in chief. The president is also the comforter in chief. That is what President Ronald Reagan was when, after 241 U.S. servicemen, mostly Marines, were killed by a terrorist attack on their Beirut barracks, he went to Camp Lejeune in North Carolina to honor those killed, to comfort those who survived and to give voice to the national grief. War’s endless expense in human suffering ought not to be shielded from either public view or from public responsibility.

Obama, during his winning campaign, promised to make Washington more “transparent” and more “accountable.” At 4 a.m. Oct. 29, as he stood silently by as six soldiers carried the remains of Army Sgt. Dale R. Griffin of Terre Haute, Ind., back to U.S. soil and to those who mourned him, Obama made both himself, and the national government he leads, more responsible and made the reality of war more transparent.

At Dover, he personally met with and consoled — in their time of profound sorrow — the families of 18 fallen Americans. No form letter or phone call. Just human being to human being.

As Glenn said: “It’s easy to see the flags flying and the people go off to war, and the bands play and the flags fly. And it’s not quite so easy when the flag is draped over a coffin coming back through Dover, Delaware.”

Obama, by choosing the “not quite so easy” path, has earned his nation’s thanks.

Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 11.01.09 @ 08:44 AM

Obama meets the test of good character, over and over and over again.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.01.09 @ 08:55 AM

Let’s chat for a moment about th “coming home from war” and “the going downtown” tests, shall we? We hve seen a spat of Vietnam War veterans boks comin tothe public attention, and the latest reports are that the Obama Administration’s reported “required reading” list - in preparation for a long-awaited Afghanistan - Pakistan war front troop level [‘boots-on-the-ground’] decision from The White House contains all the wrong books! LET ME SUGGEST AT LEAST TWO FIRST PERSON WITNESSES: (#1) USAF Colonel {retired] Jack Broughton’s “Going Downtown” [1988] &/or even his earlier, lesser known “Thud Ridge” - from the cockpit perspective of an F-105 Wing Commander who was courts-martialed for tape recording [during air strikes controlled by the LBJ Administration & then-Secretary of Defense, Robert Strange McNamara] by a foolish micro-management of air strike routes & timing—to avoid Haiphon Harbor SAMs supply depots and naked SAM sites (in the combat zone in North Vietnam) until first fired upon!  Then (#2) = Former United States Senator and former VA Secretary Max Cleland’s “Heart of a Patriot: How I Found the Courage to Survive Vietnam, Walter Reed and Karl Rove” [2009]! PERIOD! -30-

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.01.09 @ 05:21 PM

While I’ll certainly give President Obama credit for paying tribute to our fallen heroes, as with everything Obama there’s a lot less here than meets the eye.

Mr. Shields properly notes that President Obama lifted the ban on media coverage of this solemn ceremony. What he fails to disclose is that, since the ban was lifted, President Obama has had more than 230 opportunities to pay his respects. Curiously, he chose to go for the one time that a family agreed to have the media attend.

Conversely, it should be pointed out that always maligned President Bush met nearly every day with families of fallen soldiers — and he almost never allowed media coverage.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.02.09 @ 04:21 AM

“...rest of the story” = HIT IT!  READ IT! HEED IT! IT IS TRUTH!

Veterans of combat & combat support from Laos, Cambodia AND Vietnam WARS—not to forget the increasinly loquacious returning veterans from Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other Middle Eastern OR South Asian venues—HAVE FOUND THEIR VOICE! IT IS UNITED!

THEY shall lead! Others should then decide whether to EITHER: (a) follow; OR (b) get the H**L OUTTA THE WAY—IMHO!!!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.02.09 @ 02:15 PM

The President needs to make up his mind to do what it takes to get the troops the help they ask for, get rid of the suicidal political correct “rules of engagement”, instead of waiting around for a symbolic photo-op welcoming of caskets that his dilly-dallying helped produce! How dare he even think of picking up a golf club while troops are over there risking their lives waiting for him to talk to generals and make a decision!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Mark Shields: Boston’s Kevin White — He Could Have Been a Contender

Fellow Democrats undermined the big-city mayor's opportunity for a 1972 vice-presidential run

Mark Shields: Why Newt Gingrich Scares Republicans

Party faces across-the-board defeat with Gingrich the GOP presidential nominee

Mark Shields: Fritz Hollings, an Authentic South Carolina Giant

He was a rare candidate who dared to tell voters the truth as he saw it

Mark Shields: Religious Tolerance Prevails Among Republican Primary Voters

Americans seem to prefer presidential candidates who are church members rather than true believers

Mark Shields: Rick Santorum — GOP Populist, 2012 Version

Presidential candidate should stick to his roots, emphasizing his commitment to improving the lives of blue-collar Americans

Weather: Fair 54.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive