- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Mark Shields: If Al Gore Could Change One Thing
Based only on a strong hunch, I’m willing to bet that if Al Gore could change one decision in his public life, it would be that, as the 2000 Democratic presidential nominee, he would have asked then-Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla. — not Joe Lieberman, D-Conn. — to be his vice presidential running mate.
Think about it: Gore lost the White House because, by the “official” count, he lost Florida by 537 votes out of nearly 6 million cast. Graham, who never lost a Florida election and was twice elected governor and three times U.S. senator (and who had the sense and strength in 2002 to oppose the United States going to war against Iraq), undoubtedly would have guaranteed Gore winning the Sunshine State’s 25 electoral votes and the White House.
A Gore-Graham 2000 ticket would have meant, simply, that there never would have been either a President George W. Bush or a Vice President Dick Cheney.
But Gore chose Lieberman in 2000, in large part because on Sept. 3, 1998, Lieberman had become the first Democratic senator to publicly chastise President Bill Clinton for Clinton’s “sordid’ and “immoral” misconduct with Monica Lewinsky. As Clinton’s White House spokesman, Joe Lockhart, explained to a resistant Clinton on the day Gore picked Lieberman, “I think this is saying ‘screw you’ to Bill Clinton.”
In 2004, as the Democratic Party’s most recent VP nominee, Lieberman was treated as a serious presidential candidate. That January in New Hampshire, I followed around Sen. Chris Dodd, who had put his own White House ambitions on hold to back his Connecticut colleague, as he campaigned long and hard in union meetings and social clubs in support of Lieberman, who ended up in fifth place with just 9 percent of the vote.
So it was a little surprising in 2007 when Dodd did launch his own long-shot presidential campaign that Lieberman didn’t even wait until the Iowa caucuses before breaking party ranks to endorse Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
In defense of Lieberman’s scorning of Dodd, it was argued that Dodd — who had energetically backed Lieberman against a strong anti-Iraq war opponent in the 2006 Connecticut Senate primary — did endorse the primary winner, Ned Lamont, in the fall election.
Another Lieberman backer was the first-term Illinois senator who was recruited by Lieberman to be principal speaker at the pre-primary Democratic state dinner. At the event, Barack Obama, too, endorsed Lieberman.
Lieberman in 2008 was no sunshine soldier in the McCain army. He endorsed Sarah Palin, addressed the Republican convention and campaigned across the continent with high-minded words such as: “The fact that the spokesperson for Hamas would say they would welcome the election of Sen. Obama really raises the question why. And it suggests the difference between these two candidates.” Just a little guilt by association.
In 1964, John Bell Williams, then an 18-term Democratic House member from Mississippi, deserted his party and endorsed Republican Barry Goldwater for president. After that election, the House Democratic caucus stripped Williams of his seniority.
But after the 2008 election, the “Can’t We All Get Along?” spirit of Rodney King seized Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. For the very same act for which Williams had been punished with the loss of his considerable seniority 44 years earlier, Lieberman was “rewarded,” over the opposition of Sens. Pat Leahy, D-Vt., and Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, with the chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Boy, won’t that teach a tough lesson to anyone considering betraying his party?
To watch Senate Democrats and the White House fall over backward to accommodate the mood swings of Lieberman on health-care reform is to understand why MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough asked Vice President Joe Biden if Obama is liked, but not feared, in Congress. Biden insisted those who don’t fear Obama “are underestimating the steel in this guy’s spine.”
If you doubt it, just ask committee chairman Lieberman.
— Mark Shields is one of the most widely recognized political commentators in the United States. The former Washington Post editorial columnist appears regularly on CNN, on public television and on radio. Click here to contact him.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 12.20.09 @ 07:49 AM
Mr. Shields is chastising Lieberman for his independence and not always going along with the party (whichever one that happens to be at the moment). But isn’t it possible that Lieberman is simply attempting to stand up for the American people instead of always standing up for his party? I don’t always (or even often) agree with the man’s politics but if we had more politicians who voted with their heads instead of always along party lines this country would be far better off.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 12.20.09 @ 11:18 AM
That is exactly the type of candidate we will be electing in 2010. People are sick of this party politics and Obama was supposed to change all of that - turns out he is worse than any preceding. This Congress is the worst ever with Congresspeople being bribed, bought and sold with pork and every bill containing pork. Capps is ABSOLUTELY the worst - she has never had an original idea, just goes right down the party line, brings back funding for her personal pet projects and calls it a day. I love the true independents who vote on principle - based on what the people want, not what Obama Reid and Pelosi or the party want. We need more like Leiberman. I can’t think of a single other one, Democrat or Republican, that uses their own brain.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 12.20.09 @ 11:33 AM
You nailed it Gordo. I am not a supporter of Lieberman’s more liberal politics but I am a big fan of his independence. Unlike some other party switchers who have done so for political expediency Lieberman did it out of principle. You have to admire him for that. He sees the current healthcare bill as a disaster and fights it. Now, like I said I’m sure he would come up with a version I would not like from a conservative point of view but at least this one liberal senator had the brains and spine to reject a bad bill no matter who put it up there. For that the left wing of the democrat party is willing to lynch the man and his family. Quite despicable and tawdry. This is not the tactic that will win the hearts and minds of the electorate from either party.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 12.22.09 @ 08:28 PM
This man has NEVER had a REAL job—lazy Government worker—what a shock—Gov workers are not the sharpest pencils in the box—thats why they need or work for GOvernment..
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Mark Shields: Boston’s Kevin White — He Could Have Been a Contender
Fellow Democrats undermined the big-city mayor's opportunity for a 1972 vice-presidential run
Mark Shields: Why Newt Gingrich Scares Republicans
Party faces across-the-board defeat with Gingrich the GOP presidential nominee
Mark Shields: Fritz Hollings, an Authentic South Carolina Giant
He was a rare candidate who dared to tell voters the truth as he saw it
Mark Shields: Religious Tolerance Prevails Among Republican Primary Voters
Americans seem to prefer presidential candidates who are church members rather than true believers
Mark Shields: Rick Santorum — GOP Populist, 2012 Version
Presidential candidate should stick to his roots, emphasizing his commitment to improving the lives of blue-collar Americans
Weather: Fair 48.0º
Search Noozhawk »
