- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Michael Barone: When Liberal Leaders Confront a Centrist Nation
There are more conservatives than Republicans and more Democrats than liberals. That’s one of the asymmetries between the parties that helps explain the particular political spot we’re in. The numbers are fairly clear. In the 2008 exit poll, 34 percent of voters described themselves as conservatives and 32 percent as Republicans; 39 percent described themselves as Democrats but only 22 percent as liberals.
It has been that way for a long time. The premise of John Kenneth Galbraith’s The Liberal Hour, published in 1960, was that conservative politicians wanted to identify themselves as liberals, as supporting President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, when it came time for elections.
But as in his description of the economy in The New Industrial State, Galbraith was telling us how things had been, not how they soon would be. By the late 1960s, with riots blazing in big cities and rebellions roaring on university campuses, the balance shifted away from liberals and toward conservatives.
The result is that the two parties have offsetting political advantages. Democrats tend to win on party identification. Republicans tend to win on ideology. Democrats don’t have to appeal to as many independents as Republicans do. Republicans don’t have to appeal to as many moderates as Democrats do.
But the Democrats have a problem here. The party’s leadership currently tilts heavily to the liberal side. President Barack Obama is from the university community of Hyde Park in Chicago. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is from San Francisco, and important House committee chairmen are from similar “gentry urban” locales — Henry Waxman from West L.A., Charles Rangel from a district that includes not only Harlem but much of the Upper West Side of Manhattan, Barney Frank from Newton, Mass., next door to Boston.
Of the 21 top leadership members and chairmen, five come from districts carried by former presidential candidate John McCain, but the average vote in the other 16 districts was 71 percent to 27 percent for Obama.
All these Democratic leaders understand that their home turf tilts far left of the rest of the nation. But a politician’s political base is ultimately his or her reality principle. Moreover, most of these leaders — although Obama obfuscated this in his campaign — have strong, long-held convictions that are well on the left of the U.S. political spectrum.
These are the people — the House leaders more than Obama, surprisingly — who have shaped the Democrats’ stimulus package, cap-and-trade legislation and health-care bills. The rules of the House allow a skillful leader such as Pelosi to jam legislation through on the floor, although she has had more trouble than expected on health care. But their policies have been meeting resistance from the three-quarters of Americans who don’t describe themselves as liberals.
Republican leaders tend to come from mostly suburban districts closer to the national political average. Of the 19 lawmakers who are in the Republican Party’s House leadership or who are ranking committee members, four come from districts carried by Obama. The average vote in the other 15 districts was a less-than-landslide 57 percent to 41 percent for McCain. Only three of those districts voted more than 60 percent for McCain.
In these circumstances, the Republicans have been winning the battle for public opinion and, more important, for public enthusiasm — in sharp contrast to 2008. Democrats complain that Republicans have no alternatives on health care or other issues. Actually, some of them do, but no one is paying any more attention to them than people did to Democratic proposals four years ago, when Republicans held the White House and congressional majorities.
The exit poll showed that though the Republican label had lost support since 2004, conservatives did not lose their edge over liberals. The health-care debate has shown that the economic distress caused by the financial crisis and recession has not, at least so far, moved significant numbers of Americans to change their views on the proper balance between markets and government.
“I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking,” Obama said during a campaign stop in Virginia last week. “I want them just to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess.”
When a politician tries to stop debate, it’s a sign he’s losing the argument. Obama seems to have let the House Democrats overplay their hand. He ignored the fact that in our system, neither party ever has all the advantages.
— Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S. News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. Click here to contact him.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 08.14.09 @ 06:33 AM
“When a politician tries to stop debate, he is losing the argument.” When I watch the angry people shouting at town hall meetings that is exactly what they are trying to do. They are not trying to debate they are trying to shout and scream and not allow others to rationally discuss the topic. I wish people who attend these town hall meetings could calmly ask intelligent questions regarding the specifics of the proposed healthcare reform as opposed to shouting mistruths such as “deathcare” and “socialism’. Unfortunately, these folks have not read the bill but are taking their cue from tv or radio commentators or right wind organizations such as Freedom Works. Can we just have a civil and sane discussion in which we work towards something constructive?
As far as Michael Barone goes, what he does not realize is that his views are far to the right of the average American.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 08.15.09 @ 07:26 AM
Ok, Local, you overly sensitive person you, you made your point. So answer this, how are you going to pay for the new healthcare you want? Where does the money come from to expand the entire medical infrastructure to include your 40 million uninsured? Keep in mind that health care is a parasitic institution, like transportation, fully necessary for the healthy function of an economy but is an expense that generates no new wealth. So, my sensitive sparing partner, where does the money come from? Your religious zealots in the Al Gore Cap and Tax arena want to saddle what’s left of the only part of our economy that still produces wealth with more industry killing taxes. So where do we make the money to pay for all this wonderful new healthcare you say we need so much? Debate that. When you have a cogent, intelligent, well reasoned answer that takes into account all the unintended consequences you will have me convinced. Then I suggest you take that brilliant solution to your government, because they haven’t been able to figure that one out for 50 years now.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Michael Barone: Unlike Obama, GOP Candidates Talk Seriously About Governing
Republican nominee could have an advantage over an incumbent president in pure campaign mode
Michael Barone: South Carolina Hoping to Pick Next President
All arrows appear to point to Republican front-runner Mitt Romney
Michael Barone: ‘Tactical Voters’ Went to Romney in New Hampshire
He wins support from Republican undecideds, but he still has a lot of convincing to do
Michael Barone: Romney’s Watchwords in Iowa — Divide and Conquer
But it's too soon to say he has a clear flight path to the GOP presidential nomination
Michael Barone: Voters Want Growth, Not Income Redistribution
Economic distress makes Americans less, not more, supportive of big government
Weather: Fair 44.0º
Search Noozhawk »
