- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Michael Barone: Texas Shows Swagger in New Population Estimates
Every year about Christmas, the Census Bureau releases its population estimates for each state for the 12 months ending on July 1. The numbers look dry on a sheet of paper (or on an Excel spreadsheet on your computer), but they tell some vivid stories. The more so when they reflect, as the numbers for 2008-09 do, the effects of a sharp downward shift in the nation’s economy.
Given the recession, it’s not a surprise that percentage growth, at 0.86 percent, was the lowest in this decade, just a tad below the rate in 2002-03, and well below the peak years of 2000-01 (which doesn’t include 9/11) and 2006-07. Immigration is down sharply, and some indicators suggest that illegal immigrants, in particular, are returning to their countries of origin.
Also, internal mobility is down. In times of economic troubles, people tend to stay put. When we think of the 1930s, we tend to think of the Okies leaving the dust bowl for the green land of California. But the Okies were the exception. The vast bulk of Americans in the Depression decade stayed home and tended their gardens.
One thing that stands out from the 2008-09 numbers is that Americans are no longer flocking to the resorts of the Sun Belt. Florida’s growth was well below the national average, as it was in the previous year, in contrast to its torrid growth over most of the last century.
California grew at only a little more than the national average, entirely because of immigrant inflow and high immigrant birth rates. More Americans are leaving California and Florida than moving in.
The same is true of Nevada and Arizona. For most of the last two decades, they have been our two fastest-growing states; Las Vegas and Phoenix have become major metropolises in the desert.
But now they’re metropolises in trouble, with the nation’s highest foreclosure rates and collapsed construction and real estate industries. Nevada was only the 16th fastest-growing state in 2008-09, and that’s only because of (decreased) immigrant inflow. Arizona, the fastest-growing state in the previous year, now ranks No. 7.
Immigration into Nevada, Arizona and California continues, although at lower rates than earlier in the decade. Interestingly, several Northeastern states — New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, Connecticut and Rhode Island — continue to attract large percentages of immigrants, but even they (except for Massachusetts) suffer from domestic outflow. Public policies — high taxes and welfare benefits — may account for these seemingly contradictory trends.
In contrast, this recession has seen several states move to above-average population growth from below-average. They include Oklahoma, with its energy-based economy; Tennessee, one of the few states without an income tax; and South Dakota, with its thriving credit card economy.
The state with the fastest population growth in 2008-09 was demographically tiny Wyoming, the nation’s largest coal producer, which has had a higher rate of domestic in-migration than any other state. Just behind at No. 2 was Utah. With the nation’s largest birth rates and largest families, Utah demographically resembles the America of the 1950s.
No. 3 in percentage population growth in 2008-09 was giant Texas, the nation’s second most populous state. Its population grew by almost a half-million and accounted for 18 percent of the nation’s total population growth. Texas had above-average immigrant growth, but domestic in-migration was nearly twice as high.
There may be lessons for public policy here. Texas over the decades has had low taxes (and no state income tax), low public spending and regulations that encourage job growth. It didn’t have much of a housing bubble or a housing price bust.
Under Govs. George W. Bush and Rick Perry, it has placed tight limits on tort lawsuits, and has seen an influx of both corporate headquarters and medical doctors.
Bush’s late job ratings may have been low, and Perry may be a wine that doesn’t travel. But their approach to governing may not be lost even in Washington.
Polidata Inc. projects from the 2009 estimates that the reapportionment following the 2010 census will produce four new House seats for Texas, one for Arizona, Florida, Nevada and Utah, and none for California for the first time since 1850. Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania are projected to lose one each, and Ohio two. Americans have been moving, even in recession, away from Democratic strongholds and toward Republican turf.
— Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S. News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. Click here to contact him.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 12.26.09 @ 09:42 PM
Barone, are you serious??? How about in the past few years the oil companies have done much better than the economy as a whole, PERIOD? The rest of your article is so bias it is a joke. The oil patch of Oklahoma and Texas have had more job opportunities and that accounts for the difference, PERIOD. The rest of your assumptions are just a bunch of fictious garbage. George Bush never did govern the state of Texas and has no idea what constitutes a robust economy. He spent his days dropping out of the Texas Air Reserve by going awhol. Drinking like a fish and snorting like a pig, even at Camp David while his daddy was President. Oh and I forgot about the gaining entrance into Yale with a C average because of his daddy’s connection. I for one, am glad that the windshield cowboy is back in Crawford where he belongs. Also, I hope that Perry is successful in his quest to have Texas succeed from the Union.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 12.27.09 @ 05:10 PM
Actually, local, you’re an bigoted idiot (a fact, not a personal attack), and you need to actually take a vacation outside of your “local” area during the holidays to see what the world is really like.
You continue to show your ignorance and destroy your own credibility, so keep it up. People need to know exactly what liberalism is all about. It is irrational, unfounded bigoted ignorance and hatred. You are so blinded by your irrational hatred of GW that you are making up facts. Get over it, he’s gone.
Here is your simple minded train of thought:
Texas = GW = oil = bad.
“The oil patch of Oklahoma and Texas have had more job opportunities and that accounts for the difference” - not true!
From:
http://www.tracer2.com/publication.asp?PUBLICATIONID=797
From there, you can download the employment by industry in Texas to show employment in 2006 by industry along with projected growth until 2006.
There you will find Total employment in Texas in 2006 to be 11,135,900, of which oil extraction employs only 69,850.
The projected increase over ten years is 23.0 percent for Oil and Gas extraction.
The projected increase for construction is 23.1%
The projected increase for accommodation and food services is is 28.2%
The projected increase for arts entertainment and recreation is 24.8%
The projected increase for health care and social service is 36.4%
The projected increase for educational services is 33%
The projected increase for administration support, waste management, Remediation services is 29.6%
The projected increase for management companies and enterprises is 25.8%
The projected increase for professional, scientific, and technical services is 27.7%
So, bottom line, you are WRONG. Next time I see “local” I won’t bother reading, I will just say to myself “ignorant liberal moron spouting”, and skip to the next comment. Again Noozhawk, not a personal attack, but a proven fact - as just proven.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 12.27.09 @ 05:16 PM
Now the REAL reason people are leaving California is the attack on middle class and business to pay for all of the liberal programs and handouts to everyone from the jobless of the world, drug addicts, mental cases, the just plain lazy and uneducated, to the illegal immigrants and refugees from all of the other corrupt and tyrannical countries. Texas apparently does not have the same problem, or does not feed it and encourage it like the tax and spend bleeding heart liberal legislature of California. The middle class can’t afford it anymore, especially when businesses are burdened the way they are here.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Michael Barone: Unlike Obama, GOP Candidates Talk Seriously About Governing
Republican nominee could have an advantage over an incumbent president in pure campaign mode
Michael Barone: South Carolina Hoping to Pick Next President
All arrows appear to point to Republican front-runner Mitt Romney
Michael Barone: ‘Tactical Voters’ Went to Romney in New Hampshire
He wins support from Republican undecideds, but he still has a lot of convincing to do
Michael Barone: Romney’s Watchwords in Iowa — Divide and Conquer
But it's too soon to say he has a clear flight path to the GOP presidential nomination
Michael Barone: Voters Want Growth, Not Income Redistribution
Economic distress makes Americans less, not more, supportive of big government
Weather: Fair 54.0º
Search Noozhawk »
