- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Michelle Malkin: It’s All the Tea Party’s Fault
Remember “Not Me”? He was the famous invisible cartoon gremlin in the The Family Circus comic strip. Whenever toys were left on the floor or other school-age disasters struck, the kids in the comic pointed their fingers at “Not Me.” Today, “Tea Party” is the juvenile left’s new “Not Me” — an all-purpose scapegoat for every crime and disaster.
Last Thursday morning, a disturbed pilot flew a small plane into an Austin, Texas, office complex that contained an Internal Revenue Service office. Several workers in the building were injured, and Joseph Andrew Stack, the pilot, was killed in the crash. Local authorities suspect he set his house on fire — from which his wife and daughter escaped — before taking off on his deadly journey. Investigators found a Web posting, identified as Stack’s “suicide manifesto,” in which he railed against tax laws, inequity, government and crony capitalism. He also targeted “puppet” George W. Bush, murderous health-care insurers and the pharmaceutical industry.
The “manifesto” ended:
The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.
This nutball had deadly grudges that transcended partisan lines. But within minutes of the story breaking, a furious left-wing blogger at the popular Daily Kos Web site — where countless Democratic leaders have guest-posted — fumed: “Teabagger terrorist attack on IRS building.” The article immediately cast blame on the anti-tax Tea Party movement: “After months of threats on the United States government, and government institutions, the Anti-Government forces known as the teabaggers have struck with their first 911 (sic) inspired terrorist attack.”
At the eponymous mega-Web site of Arianna Huffington, a 2,000-plus comment thread was filled with allusions to “teabaggers”:
I would bet he has a membership card to teabag nation and the Glenn Beck fan club!
Tea bag bomb.
Good to see natural selection still works! Tea party Unite!
This guy sounds just like a teabagger.
Oh please. This has tea bags dripping all over it.
I hope teabaggers are proud!! ... Great opening day for CPAC (the Conservative Political Action Conference) isn’t it??
This guy sounds like a Tea Partier first class! Maybe that movement is more DANGEROUS to our freedoms than they let on! Be afraid America, BE VERY AFRAID!
He was a Tea Party Terrorist.
In the early aftermath of the suicidal pilot’s attack, there was no evidence that Stack belonged to a Tea Party organization. In any case, no law-abiding Tea Party group would ever condone what he did. But it didn’t stop the haters from immediately smearing advocates of limited government. And it’s just the latest in a long line of calculated attempts to paint the vast majority of peaceful Tea Party activists as terrorist threats to civil society.
Last week, absurd liberal pundits and bloggers also tried to connect the tragic University of Alabama-Huntsville murders to the Tea Party movement. No matter that the alleged killer, Amy Bishop, was an Obama-worshiping academic who repeatedly got a soft-on-crime pass. Or that Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass., was the former prosecutor involved in dropping charges against Bishop in the deadly shooting of her teenage brother. Or that liberal-dominated campus officials apparently looked the other way in response to Bishop’s several red-flag flashes of violence leading up to the shootings.
Tea Party-bashers claimed that the murders were a manifestation of racist conservative influence on the American landscape. Reuters Foundation Fellow Jonathan Curiel picked up the theme: “The ‘results’ that the Tea Party movement envisions include less government — and less of Obama.”
Curiel bemoaned the rejection of a post-racial society by tying together the Alabama massacre and the rise of the Tea Party movement more explicitly. Proof of anti-Obama bigotry, he wrote, could be found in “last week’s shooting in Alabama, where a disgruntled white professor murdered three minority professors; and the growing success of the Tea Party movement, which is overwhelmingly white and increasing (sic) vocal in its violent dislike of the nation’s first black president.”
The same warped worldview blamed Tea Party conservatives for Kentucky census worker Bill Sparkman’s insurance-scam-inspired suicide and for U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum shooter James Von Brunn’s rampage (despite his published rants against Fox News).
The smear merchants, of course, are simply following White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel’s advice to exploit every crisis. Pointing fingers at the Tea Party gremlin demonizes the left’s most potent political opponents. This is the blame-gamers’ ultimate agenda: criminalizing dissent.
— Michelle Malkin is author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies. Click here for more information. She can be contacted at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
» wrote on 02.22.10 @ 11:37 AM
The government unions have destroyed civil service—abolish or out law government unions—lets vote on it——they are already civil servants—
» wrote on 02.22.10 @ 04:05 PM
Malkin is a real day-brightener.
No matter what topic she chooses to sink her teeth into, whenever I’m finished
glancing at it, I find myself LOL.
That’s a real asset during the cooler, grayer days of Winter, isn’t it?
Others might find her views somewhere between histrionic and hysterical.
But clearly, if you look at the ecstatic followers of Palin and Beck, there must be a lot of folks to whom Malkin’s interesting world view resonates deeply.
» wrote on 02.22.10 @ 04:39 PM
Right LTR, but what about what she is saying? Do you agree, disagree or what? What is it with you lefties that you can only comment on the person and not what they say? I agree, call her a loon, radical or any other derogatory remark but at least do it in context of what she said.
» wrote on 02.22.10 @ 06:03 PM
Ok AN50. I will only talk about the article. I agree it is not right to blame any organization such as the Tea Party or any other for these incidences Malkin describes. It is wrong to jump to conclusions without evidence. So I agree with the article and hopefully this type of unsubstantiated blame will stop no matter which direction it comes from or from what individual. Too many times ,both from the left and the right, blame or adjectives are thrown out without proof. To often, claims are made or labels are attached or names are called to get a reaction without any intent on solving issues or finding common ground to move forward. Both sides are equally guilty and it is a total waste of time when there are big problems to address.
» wrote on 02.24.10 @ 10:38 AM
Jeeze Local, aren’t you gonna yell at me? This ain’t no fun at all, you and me agreeing with each other. Oh wait, there are some other comments on other articles I can pound you with (he he).
Cheers my friend!
More Local News »
Michelle Malkin: Virginia Rep. Jim Moran, Racist Pig
Obama critic Rep. Allen West the target of the congressman's latest tirade
Michelle Malkin: The Obamas, aka Mr. and Mrs. Cranky Pants
Tarmac encounter with Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer riles the president's, er, sensitive side
Michelle Malkin: The Land of Obama Make-Believe
President's idea of economic recovery includes lowering visa standards and risking homeland security
Michelle Malkin: Despite Conflicts of Interest, Obama’s ‘Razist’ Lobbyist Moves Up
Cecilia Munoz expands the reach of her radical multi-culti advocacy into the White House
Michelle Malkin: Obama’s Super-Czar Is on the Loose
Political end-run gives unfettered power to new director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Weather: Fair 54.0º
Search Noozhawk »
