Wednesday, October 7 , 2015, 12:31 pm | Fair 75º

Trial Ordered for Suspect in Fatal Hit-and-Run of Former Santa Barbara High Coach

CHP officers testify at a preliminary hearing for Lau Van Huynh, 78, of Murrieta, charged in the death of 22-year-old Simon Chavez

Lau Van Huynh, 78, of Murrieta appeared in Santa Barbara County Superior Court in Santa Barbara on Monday for a preliminary hearing. He is accused of hit-and-run in the death of Simon Chavez, 22, of Santa Barbara last month.
Lau Van Huynh, 78, of Murrieta appeared in Santa Barbara County Superior Court in Santa Barbara on Monday for a preliminary hearing. He is accused of hit-and-run in the death of Simon Chavez, 22, of Santa Barbara last month.  (Lara Cooper / Noozhawk photo)

By Lara Cooper, Noozhawk Staff Writer | @laraanncooper |

California Highway Patrol officers recounted a horrific scene on Monday as they testified about the death of a 22-year-old Santa Barbara man whose mangled remains were found on Highway 101 after what they allege was a hit-and-run accident involving an elderly Southern California man.

The body of Simon Chavez, a former Santa Barbara High School baseball coach, was found just after 1 a.m. Jan. 15 on the southbound lanes of Highway 101 near the Ortega Street footbridge.

Several witnesses reported that Chavez had been staggering in traffic before he was struck, according to testimony Monday in Santa Barbara County Superior Court.

Chavez was pronounced dead at the scene after Santa Barbara police and CHP officers arrived just minutes later.

Pieces of a white 2011 Hyundai Tucson, including the left driver-side mirror, were found at the scene, but the driver had not stopped.

Eleven days later, police arrested Lau Van Huynh, 78, of Murrieta on charges of felony hit-and-run, and hit-and-run with fatal injuries in Chavez’s case.

Investigators had found a vehicle matching the description in his garage, and had to obtain a search warrant to search the vehicle, after Huynh’s daughter told them they couldn’t search the vehicle and that she didn’t know anyone by her father’s name, according to testimony Monday.

Huynh, clad in a blue jumpsuit and listening to the proceedings through a Vietnamese translator, appeared in Judge Clifford Anderson’s courtroom on Monday afternoon.

At the end of the hearing, Anderson ruled that enough evidence exists to send Huynh to trial.

Deputy District Attorney Sanford Horowitz introduced two witnesses, both of whom were California Highway Patrol officers.

Officer Robert Grindy, who said he has conducted about 350 collision investigations in his time with the CHP, was the first to take the stand.

He testified that he responded to the scene just after dispatch reported several calls from people who had seen the young man on the highway.

Grindy arrived to find multiple emergency personnel at the incident, and began walking the scene with another investigator.

“Immediately, we noted that there were various body parts strewn throughout the roadway, and also various vehicle parts,” he said.

Horowitz showed Grindy a picture of Chavez’s body lying in the roadway between the first and second lanes, and the officer confirmed that it was Chavez and that he had taken the photograph himself.

Horowitz pressed Grindy further about exactly what had been discovered during his investigation, and Grindy said both of Chavez’s shoes had been found, along with the vehicle’s left sideview mirror, a piece of plastic fender, and various vehicle components and a piece of headlamp glass. 

Grindy also described a gruesome scene with human remains “strewn about the lanes.”

Blood and hair fragments were found on the mirror, and the fender had a “blue streak” on the driver side panel, which Grindy said could have been a result from the denim jeans Chavez was wearing. 

The vehicle was nowhere to be found that night, he said, and the driver did not call dispatch.

Huynh’s attorney, Peter Chang, asked Grindy about the first person to call 9-1-1, who confirmed that Chavez had no reaction when the person yelled at him as he drove by.

Grindy said the witness hadn’t remarked whether Chavez had seemed to be under the influence, however. 

Chavez’s toxicology results, which would reveal any alcohol or drugs in his system, have not been released by the Santa Barbara County Coroner’s Office.

Chang also questioned whether the blue streak could have come from Chavez’s jeans, and Grindy said that no forensic testing had been done to match the fabric and the color embedded in the fender.

When asked what other evidence was seen on the vehicle, Grindy said he had found what looked like brain matter burned into the bulb of the left front headlamp of the car.

CHP Sgt. Andrew Chapman also took the stand, and said he and other investigators saw a white Hyundai with Huynh driving leaving the Chumash Casino at 12:33 a.m. Jan. 15.

The vehicle was registered to Huynh at his address in Murrietta, Chapman said, and an investigator later went to the address, where he saw the suspect vehicle in the garage.

Chapman said Jamie Huynh, the suspect’s daughter, wouldn’t allow the investigator to speak to Huynh.

After a search warrant was obtained, Chapman said, the vehicle appeared “as if it had been wiped down” on the driver’s door panel and where the collision damage was.

In spite of that, “there was some hair stuck to the molding,” Chapman said, and also confirmed the blue streak on the fender, as well as the bodily matter on the left, front headlamp.

Chang asked why there would still be evidence if the vehicle had been wiped down, and Chapman responded that evidence could still remain embedded on the car.

Chapman said Huynh appeared at the California Highway Patrol office to turn himself in on Jan. 26 after the search warrant was issued.

On Feb. 28, the case will go before Judge Jean Dandona.

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.

comments powered by Disqus

» on 02.12.13 @ 03:08 PM

Why hasn’t the toxicology report on Simon Chavez been released? Is it being held for a reason?

» on 02.12.13 @ 03:10 PM

What was the victim doing on Highway 101?

» on 02.12.13 @ 03:53 PM

Good questions, but is not the real question and lesson: why did the driver of the white Hyuandai not stop after this horrific accident? The driver might not have been able to avoid hitting the victim, but leaving the scene made it worse for everyone concerned.

» on 02.12.13 @ 04:04 PM

To the other commentators—the issue here is not if the victim was intoxicated, the issue is that the driver did not stop.

» on 02.12.13 @ 07:15 PM

Hopefully, the complete story of what happened will come out at the trial. Why was the victim on the freeway, what do the toxicology reports show, and why didn’t the driver stop.

» on 02.12.13 @ 07:54 PM

This is very sad.  How would you react if someone popped up on the freeway and you couldn’t avoid this person and your car smashed the person to smithereens? Would you have stopped - for most of us the answer is probably yes - but in that moment of incredible stress and shock - do we really know how we would react?  Even if he had stopped - his life had been dramatically changed for the worse due to no fault of his own.  Then if you were 78 years old, didn’t speak English…........  Had he stopped - he would have obeyed the law - but the man who popped up on the freeway would already have been dead.  I guess I am feeling a lot of empathy for both of these men.  A great case of - there but by the Grace of (put in whatever you believe) go I.

Marty Jenkins

» on 02.13.13 @ 01:48 AM

There’s a lot of speculation online about how and why the victim came to be on the freeway, but it isn’t relevant to this particular trial.

The defendant allegedly failed to stop at the scene of an accident wherein someone was injured/died. That’s it. Had the defendant simply stopped after the accident and waited for the CHP, he would not be going to trial for hit and run.

The prosecution won’t spend a lot of time on why or how the victim came to be on the freeway. I doubt if they even know. They will focus on proving the defendant’s vehicle hit the victim and that the defendant was driving, and that the defendant failed to stop after the accident. That’s it.

Someone out there knows why the victim was on the freeway, but to date that person hasn’t come forward. If they do, then I have no doubt the CHP will investigate and determine if other people will be arrested and charged in connnection with the incident.

» on 02.13.13 @ 02:09 AM

Why is it taking the Coroner’s Office so long to release the toxicology results?
Sounds to me like a cover-up!
Herman P.

» on 02.14.13 @ 09:44 PM

I totally get the driver should have stopped, but what the heck was that kid doing on the freeway (and stumbling according to witnesses). That poor old man (78 years old) was probably shocked to death and didn’t know what to do. Totally wrong that the daughter tried to cover up for him, but seriously, do you think he intentionally and purposely tried to hit him and run him over on purpose??!! Of course not! It was terrible, tragic accident. I think the whole family is in shock. I feel for both families, but it was a total accident.

» on 02.15.13 @ 10:25 PM

Too many are missing the point of this arrest. Everyone knows Simon’s death was an accident. The crime is everything after the accident happened, that didn’t involve stopping.
The driver made the choice to not stop and by doing so, broke the law. He also made the unconscionable decision to not stop and render aid.
Every moment he continued on his drive home to Orange County, he continued to decide to do the wrong thing.
Upon arriving home, he attempted to wash the car of any evidence of the accident. Another bad decision.
He hid the car. Another bad decision.
He was organizing to possibly flee the country or at the very least flee the state. Another bad decision.
His family lied for him, claiming to not know even who he was!
There was one tragic accident, followed by a series of decisions and it’s those bad decisions that put him in jail, not the accident.
And yes, I can understand the driver being totally freaked out and I guess trying to cover your ass at all costs is an ugly part of human nature.
But regardless of that, to just continue driving, when someone you just hit is lying, bleeding in the roadway is unforgivable.

Support Noozhawk Today

You are an important ally in our mission to deliver clear, objective, high-quality professional news reporting for Santa Barbara, Goleta and the rest of Santa Barbara County. Join the Hawks Club today to help keep Noozhawk soaring.

We offer four membership levels: $5 a month, $10 a month, $25 a month or $1 a week. Payments can be made through PayPal below, or click here for information on recurring credit-card payments.

Thank you for your vital support.


Daily Noozhawk

Subscribe to Noozhawk's A.M. Report, our free e-Bulletin sent out every day at 4:15 a.m. with Noozhawk's top stories, hand-picked by the editors.