- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Politics
- School Zone
- Youth Camps
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Residents Have Their Say On UCSB Expansion Plan
The promoters of UCSB’s Long-Range Development Plan gave residents the floor Wednesday as they took public comment from the university’s neighbors and other interested parties at Isla Vista Theater.
“Tonight is for the public to comment and for the university to listen,” said Tye Simpson, UCSB director of the office of campus planning and design.
One by one, residents aired their concerns over the university’s planned expansion, a project that will encompass the next 18 years, add about 2.5 million square feet in new development, create an estimated 4,000 jobs and add 5,000 students to UCSB’s population, along with almost 2,000 new faculty and support staff positions for an expanded academic program. UCSB has acknowledged significant local effects of the LDRP including changes to traffic, air quality and scenic views.
“I feel there’s a carrying capacity to this area, and adding 6,746 people would cause unmitigable impacts to the community,” said Kelly Hildner, a wetlands biologist and a resident of the Storke Ranch neighborhood, a community just inside the the Goleta side of the border between UCSB and the city.
Hildner and her fellow Storke Ranch neighbors are battling to keep the university from making good on plans to connect the segment of Phelps Road that runs through their community with Mesa Road on the other side of a gate where Phelps ends. Punching that street through, they say, would create a traffic hazard for the children who regularly play in and around that two-lane street.
In a four-part presentation by representatives from the Santa Barbara County Action Network, UCSB representatives were asked if the the university’s plans took into account the adequacy of housing and infrastructure during UCSB’s drive to increase its student population by 1 percent each year.
“A 5,000-enrollment increase exceeds the water potentials of Goleta,” Dick Flacks said. Water, the university’s plan projects, would be provided in part by the Goleta Water District, but UCSB, GWD’s biggest customer, would have to find other sources to come up with a sufficient supply.
Isla Vista resident Florence Klein talked about the effect an increased population on campus would have in conjunction with the increased population projected in Isla Vista as a result of the state housing mandate. “Nobody has taken into consideration an evacuation plan for Isla Vista,” she said, pointing out the only two roads people in Isla Vista would have to use to escape, both of which would suffer significant congestion as a result of development.
But it wasn’t all complaints and fears that residents put forth. Several solutions were floated to answer the concern over increased traffic and congestion on local roads. A light rail system was widely supported, if UCSB and the city of Goleta could collaborate on alternative transit in an around the university. A good alternative transit system would ease the strain on roads, air quality gas consumption and the need to use university space to add about 3,500 new parking spaces, they said. Prohibiting freshmen and sophomores from using their cars on campus also would keep the roads less crowded.
Likewise, residents supported the idea of a satellite campus in an area that could take the additional people and use the additional jobs.
The LRDP got support from the Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce and the Coastal Housing Coalition, which praised the university, one of Goleta’s largest employers, for the plan that would create new jobs and housing.
The university promised responses to the comments in writing, after the comment period for the LRDP and its accompanying environmental document.
Comments can be sent to the university by postal mail or e-mail. The public comment period ends June 23.
Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at sfernandez@noozhawk.com.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.
- No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
- No vulgar or discriminatory language.
- If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
- Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
- Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
- Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.
Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.
» on 06.07.08 @ 02:40 PM
UCSB is such a big asset to the Santa Barbara and surrounding living area. I think a shuttle around the area would be a great help. Give an incentive to students for using bikes would encourage more to do so. Cottage Hospital has had success with their program. Our population has grown since UCSB moved to its present campus as so must it also grow.
» on 06.09.08 @ 01:51 PM
UCSB’s plan to overtake my home, tear out my trees which house endangered species and is alongside a federal reserve for sea life is stupid at best.
No thought has been given to the disabeled students and students in chairs whose access is already compromised by bikes. The tunnel is the only safe and short cut for those in chairs and to take it out is ansinine. The worst of the worst, besides the IVRPD taking a million dollars for putting in a new soccar field on top of one that is already there, to the attempt to steal Mark Ofela’s palm trees, after calling them weeds, onlyto reapear in front of some vegas casino, well, it all just takes my breath away. How is the university and the isla vista master plan working together to take away open space and kill endangered species must be against some kind of law, doncha think. QUick, someone call the Enviromental Defense Fund and ask them to explain how the master plans are not healthy nor legal. Oh well. As Obama says we need a change. Retire Ken Warfield from office when you vote in November. The worst thing is the teen center, which is condemed and the park board without my approval by the way did not do a thing to stop it. Arghhhhhh.
More Local News »
Road to Recovery Continues for Channel Islands National Park
Park superintendent says commitment to resource restoration remains focus for archipelago
Free-Flying Brown Pelicans a Recovery Success Story
After 40 years on the Endangered Species List, the seabirds were recently delisted as their numbers reached historic levels
Ride, Wine and Dine with Vino Vaqueros
Experience the richness of the Santa Ynez Valley on horseback, followed by wine tasting and a meal
Nite Moves Still On the Go After 21 Years of Waterfront Fun
Santa Barbara's original run- and ocean-swim event lures a 'mini-community' of loyal participants
Santa Barbara Surf Club Rides a Storied History
Hollister Ranch roots run true and deep, even as club's territory and reputation expand
Weather: Fair 60.0º
Search Noozhawk »
