UCSB’s Ocean Road Housing Project Draws Criticism

Some speakers question the project's timing with the Long Range Development Plan; other concerns center on affordability, sustainability and outreach.

By | Posted on 11.11.2008

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Share

Though only a few people attended UCSB‘s Environmental Impact Report scoping meeting last Thursday for its Ocean Road Housing Project, the reaction from the small but vocal crowd was not particularly positive.

The Ocean Road project would be a 532-unit housing, commercial and academic project spread out over 12 blocks at the university’s western border with Isla Vista, along both sides of Ocean Road. It would be geared primarily toward providing badly needed housing for UCSB faculty and staff, as well as the future need for housing projected by the university’s Long Range Development Plan. Buildings would range in height from two to six stories, with units that vary from studios to three-bedroom townhouses.


View Larger Map

Additionally, 2,600 square feet of the development would be dedicated to commercial space and 54,400 square feet for student space. More than a thousand parking spaces are proposed to handle the new residential and commercial operations in the area.

To be able to lay out its buildings, UCSB would have to realign Ocean Road and relocate the Student Health Center in the area. The eucalyptus windrow that runs along the proposed project would be removed.

Much of the criticism on Thursday night centered on the project’s timing. The Ocean Road project is part of the UCSB Long Range Development Plan, which has not yet been completed, and is running on its own separate track: Rejection or delay in the approval of the LRDP would not necessarily affect the progress of the Ocean Road project.

“Review of the proposed Ocean Road Housing project is premature because it relies on an amendment to the university’s existing LRDP that has not been approved by the Regents or certified by the California Coastal Commission,” local resident George Relles said on behalf of the Santa Barbara County Action Network, a group monitoring local housing issues. Furthermore, he said, considering the project outside of the LRDP would result in piecemeal review, which is prohibited under the California Environmental Quality Act.

The review of the Ocean Road project in parallel with the LRDP is not that uncommon, said Tye Simpson, UCSB director of campus planning and design.

“It’s the same kind of process you would use in updating a General Plan,” he later told Noozhawk. It would be piecemeal, he said, only if the project wasn’t part of the bigger UCSB development effort.

Other speakers, mostly students, touched on what the new project would do to the problem of gentrification of the student enclave. Development companies are gearing their projects to more affluent students, they said. Working-class families have been forced out of their apartments to make way for housing students who can afford to pay more rent.

Yet others called on the university to adhere to the sustainability principles it adopted when it formed its Campus Sustainability Committee, and apply them to the communities surrounding UCSB, such as Goleta and Isla Vista, not just the campus.

Many took issue with the seeming lack of outreach performed by the university, saying they weren’t even aware of the project and that the public hearings were being scheduled at inopportune times.

The Ocean Road housing project is still in its planning stages. Public comment on what the scope of the EIR should be will be taken up Dec. 20. A planning scherrette with AS Bikes and the Santa Barbara Bicycle Coalition will be held in mid-December to discuss the bicycle and pedestrian circulation in that heavily used area.

Click here to see the plans for the proposed project and to make comments.

Write to sfernandez@noozhawk.com.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.

  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
  4. Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
  5. Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
  6. Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 11.11.08 @ 05:06 AM

Read this article closely. Does anyone believe Tye Simpson has any credibility? Are Mr. Relles’ comments accurate? Yes this would be similar to the manner a Project within a General Plan would be considered “after the General Plan is approved!!!” Not before, and with the LRDP with admitted serious flaws in its environmental analysis. The LRDP DEIR is going to be re-circulated but the University has started this new EIR and not even told the public about the status of the LRDP. This is bad planning, unfortunately indicative of what we have come to expect from the University staff, and in this time of severe financial concerns, how can it be justified? Get the LRDP approved before you build anything please!


» on 11.11.08 @ 12:08 PM

UCSB NEEDS TO ROLL-BACK ITS ENROLLMENT AND STOP THE ARTIFICIAL NEED FOR HIGH DENSITY HOUSING.


» on 11.11.08 @ 06:12 PM

As a location for faculty housing, it is laughably bad. That area is loud ‘round the clock. Additionally, I don’t understand where this supposed space is other than the little triangle where (necessary) Student Health currently exists, or replacing parking lots with another parking garage.
I’m all in favor of high density housing - it is more environmentally sound and promotes community. Would make more sense to put this along Mesa road.


More Local News »

Road to Recovery Continues for Channel Islands National Park

Park superintendent says commitment to resource restoration remains focus for archipelago

Free-Flying Brown Pelicans a Recovery Success Story

After 40 years on the Endangered Species List, the seabirds were recently delisted as their numbers reached historic levels

Ride, Wine and Dine with Vino Vaqueros

Experience the richness of the Santa Ynez Valley on horseback, followed by wine tasting and a meal

Nite Moves Still On the Go After 21 Years of Waterfront Fun

Santa Barbara's original run- and ocean-swim event lures a 'mini-community' of loyal participants

Santa Barbara Surf Club Rides a Storied History

Hollister Ranch roots run true and deep, even as club's territory and reputation expand

Weather: Fair 64.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive