County Supervisors Approve Santa Barbara Ranch Development

The 3-2 vote brings the project closer to fruition after more than 10 years of wrangling.

By | Posted on 10.22.2008

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (4)
  • Share

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved the controversial Santa Barbara Ranch development proposal.

Plans for Santa Barbara Ranch include about 70 luxury homes on about 3,200 acres of land from the historic Naples townsite to the foothills of the adjacent Dos Pueblos Ranch.

The 3-2 vote was split between 3rd, 4th and 5th District Supervisors Brooks Firestone, Joni Gray and Joseph Centeno, and 1st and 2nd District Supervisors Salud Carbajal and Janet Wolf.

“I think you could do better for the community,” said Carbajal, who nevertheless commended developer Matt Osgood for his outreach in the decade the project has been on the county’s planning desk.

Carbajal and Wolf expressed concern over the process, particularly what has been called the “October Surprise” of a couple of weeks ago — an amendment to the agreement that essentially separated the inland portion of the project from the coastal portion into separate phases that would allow for development in the foothills while the California Coastal Commission reviews the coastal portion. Former supervisors Gail Marshall, Susan Rose and Naomi Schwartz have expressed their opposition to what they term the “bifurcation” of the development process, which was done in closed session.

According to the developer, that phasing of the development was part of the Memorandum of Understanding agreement entered into by himself and the county in 2002. The last two (out of about 16) signatures needed to formally execute the agreement came in at the last minute during the Tuesday hearing.

The supervisors’ vote brings the project ever closer to fruition after more than 10 years of wrangling between the developer, the county and local environmental groups who have coalesced to keep the Gaviota Coast clear from any development. Before Osgood, Naples owner and would-be developer Jack Morehart was involved in a similar struggle with the environmental groups.

The decision comes just in time for Osgood, as the November elections look to bring in a successor to Firestone, in whose district the development is located. Third District hopefuls Doreen Farr and Steve Pappas are both known to be skeptical of Naples development.

Meanwhile, the supervisors who supported the project saw it as something like the lesser of two evils. Noting Osgood’s claim that if the development was not approved, he could revert to the original 219 lots on 485 acres of the original 1800s tract map of Naples, they opted not to allow for piecemeal development of the coastal bluffs.

“My plea is to consider making advantageous deals — locking up the land now by giving a little bit,” Firestone said. The development proposal also puts 2,600 acres of Dos Pueblos Ranch into an agricultural easement.

The supervisors’ go-ahead is also a step toward putting to rest the legal action Osgood filed against the county in 2002 to assert his development rights, and had stayed pending the county’s participation in the planning and development process.

The county is not yet in the clear as far as litigation, as the Naples Coalition has indicated it would sue the county over its role in the development of Santa Barbara Ranch.

The next step for the development, Osgood said, will be for the the design and permitting stage. The coastal portion still will need to be reviewed by the California Coastal Commission. If all goes smoothly, construction could begin by the end of next year. Osgood says he will continue to work with the community during that time.

Noozhawk staff writer Sonia Fernandez can be reached at sfernandez@noozhawk.com.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.

  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
  4. Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
  5. Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
  6. Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 10.22.08 @ 08:14 AM

Carbajal is so disappointing.  One of these days I hope he sees the light before he shuts down this county with his protectionist agenda.  His district knows the feeling all too well.  Here he is quoted as if he is a judge scolding the defendant from the bench.

I am impressed that this passed, Firestone’s logic and vote will be missed.


» on 10.22.08 @ 11:36 AM

I do not understand what the value is in developing more and more in our area, when we are maxed out already. The quality of life here in SB has been compromised a great deal since the pace of development approval has increased over the last decade. Increased traffic, dirty beaches and over crowding has made me want to move away from the beautiful town that I grew up in. It just makes me sad. Tell me what benefits the community with this project other than the few people who will get construction jobs and the developer himself who will make a fortune.  Oh there are those 70 rich families who will get to live there. Please tell me how I benefit?


» on 10.23.08 @ 12:31 PM

Honestly this Osgood menace should be considered as a public enemy in the sense that he is trying to diminish our community for his own capital gain. I don’t know who he thinks he is but he needs to take his little circus back to Orange County or whatever overcrowded place he descends from and try his superiority somewhere else. Nobody in this area wants him here he is only downgrading the quality of life and causing animosity among true natives. He will be taken to court over and over again until his spirit, or bank account is diminished - whichever comes first. I urge everyone to rally together to fight this ass clown and his selfish and greedy ways until he and everyone in his thug crew is ran out of town for good. And when that happens it will serve as a sign to every other worthless developed eyeing the area for a pipe dream involving destroying the county’s natural beauty for a selfish buck - be gone!!


» on 11.25.08 @ 05:10 PM

Yes, Carbajal is so disappointing.  He needs to be replaced.


More Local News »

It’s a Blooming Good Time for Wildflower Blossoms

Looking for spring sights? We can tell you right where to go

Road to Recovery Continues for Channel Islands National Park

Park superintendent says commitment to resource restoration remains focus for archipelago

Free-Flying Brown Pelicans a Recovery Success Story

After 40 years on the Endangered Species List, the seabirds were recently delisted as their numbers reached historic levels

Ride, Wine and Dine with Vino Vaqueros

Experience the richness of the Santa Ynez Valley on horseback, followed by wine tasting and a meal

Nite Moves Still On the Go After 21 Years of Waterfront Fun

Santa Barbara's original run- and ocean-swim event lures a 'mini-community' of loyal participants

Weather: Overcast 63.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive