- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Diana Thorn: The People’s Movement, the People’s Moment
Today, America is at a crossroads and 2010 will be a pivotal year. There is a war going on and it will determine the direction America goes. It is a battle of radical leftists versus traditional Americans, and the government versus the people. An out-of-control government is ignoring and victimizing the private sector and average Americans. Its cohorts are the media, liberal organizations, unions and a socialist/Marxist-leaning administration.
The good news, the American public has awakened. Thus the emergence of the people’s movement, better known as the Tea Party movement. One recent outcome related to this movement was the election of Sen. Scott Brown in Massachusetts. The people spoke up and said America is going in the wrong direction. The question is ... is anyone listening?
The Tea Party movement is a 21st-century phenomenon. It came together outside of a national party or leader because people believe their country needs to return to the principles that made this nation the beacon of liberty, prosperity and optimism to the world. Tea parties exist locally as well as nationally and aim to defend those principles set forth by our Founding Fathers, especially limited government, lower taxes and the Bill of Rights. Tea parties are nonpartisan, which includes Democrats, Republicans, independents, Libertarians, and people from all social levels, including students.
Recently, the Tea Party movement has become a target. Democrats, some Republicans, liberal organizations and the media have attempted to marginalize, slander and redefine this movement. However, because this grassroots movement has no central leader, does not include politicians and is not a third party, their efforts will not work. This is a movement that has taken root, is growing and will continue to influence politics in America.
Click here for more information about the Santa Barbara Tea Party & Culpepper Society.
— Diana Thorn is vice president of the Santa Barbara Tea Party & Culpepper Society.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 03.01.10 @ 10:00 PM
Yes, what a breakthrough. Now the people who continually vote against their own interests, formerly known as conservative Republicans, have the Tea Bagger and Tea Party banner to wave over their wrong-headed political agendas. While these “patriots” demonize public option health care, a very workable fact of life in every other modern nation including Israel, which we pay for, do they ever decry the $1 trillion a year expenditure on defense and the military? Of course not - while they stand idlly as fully HALF of the federal government’s descretionary budget is spent on defense contractors and war, they insist we can’t “afford” health care and other domestic spending to ensure quality public education, social services, roads, bridges and mass transit. Unfortunately, intelligent public policy isn’t best shaped through the fog of emotionally over-the-top nationalistic rallies.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.01.10 @ 10:50 PM
Noozhawk, or hawk news?
FYI: the Tea Party is an astroturf organization.
See who’s funding the Tea Party movement:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement_funding
also FYI: i’m from MA and i can tell you, despite the surface result, there was MUCH more to Brown’s ‘win.’ Much more. John Walsh makes his case: http://www.counterpunch.com/walsh01202010.html
And then there are those who will no longetr participate in ‘Novemeber follies’; the numbers are growing…
My advice to all is: dig deep; not much is as it seems.
And importantly, btw: “liberal news” is a mantra dreamed up by the right. Repeat it enough and people believe it, despite obvious evidence to the contrary. Calling the media liberal is like calling Israel a democracy. Our ‘news’, as a matter of fact, is controlled by zionists.
Sadly ...
You have already flagged this entry.
» on 03.01.10 @ 11:00 PM
Invest in Alcoa. Foil sales will rise.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 03:42 AM
Is Thorn talking about the Scott Brown who a week or so after being seated proceeded to side with the “socialist, marxist, terrorist Obama” on the jobs bill? The new coming of Jesus cross voted and the rightwingnuts were boiling the tar and collecting feathers , further proving their ship is in serious need of rudder repair .
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 09:24 AM
Keep up the good work, Diane! i enjoy your letters to the Coastal View also. November cannot come soon enough for me.
Some people are just slow to realize that the Tea Party Movement is about the real change and getting our country back to it’s roots….the constitution and not the living breathing document liberals espouse, to weaken our society!
Thanks!
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 10:07 AM
Emptynewsroom = emptyhead. That tea bagger insult you just through at your mother. I hope she appreciates what a wonderful conceited, narcissist she raised. Every time you brilliant geniuses insult the tea party movement you increase its size exponentially. But hey, you go on believing you are that smart and everyone else is that stupid.
As for your whiny crybaby mantra of “all the other socialist countries do it why can’t we” regarding the “public option”, why don’t you try it there first, don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Fact is it doesn’t work anywhere it’s tried unless you are rich. As for the defense budget, when we cut your crybaby friends in Europe off and force them to defend themselves we’ll see how long the stay solvent being the mother of all nannies. Oh wait a minute, they don’t pay for their own defense and they are already insolvent. Yikes! I guess not having the slightest idea how to make wealth and grow it really does matter.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 11:23 AM
AN50: Brilliant comback. I’m sure you’re correct that the rest of the world is just awful and your delusional paradise is the best on Earth. Oh, wait! The U.S. has poverty levels not seen in any other industrialized nation? High infant mortality rates, poor public education and untrained workers too? Millions of middle class taxpayers without access to health care, losing their homes to foreclosure and the highest unemployment rates in over half a century? Huh, I guess maybe we CAN learn something from other countries that are currently enjoying a higher standard of living and much more enlightened, stress-free lives than us, don’t you think?
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 12:59 PM
Diana, I usually agree with much of what you write in the News Press, but here I think you’re a bit off target. The conflict we have in the U.S. is between the radical Left and the radical Right. Supposedly 65 or so percent of the country are Centrists (even in the failed state of California).
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 01:06 PM
It is very bracing that the unquestioning heart and soul of Fox News accuracy
and objectivity has stepped up to lead the south coast Tea Party chapter.
Diana Thorn will give the same kind, civil, fact-based leadership to the Tea Party that she gives to all controversial and political issues, everywhere.
Those who fear George Soros, or losing their right to carry loaded guns in
Yosemite should join her at once.
Those who are unaware of what her friends’ economic policies did to America during the Bush years, or who supported them, should rally to her.
Those who did not worry about our failure to find any Weapons of Mass
Destruction after we invaded Iraq, or our re-deploying our Afghan forces
to Iraq, when we had bin Laden trapped in Tora Bora should support her.
Diana Thorn has the brains of Mitch McConnell, the kind heart of Karl Rove,
the free market moxie of Alan Greenspan, the gentle spirit of Dick Cheney,
the sober demeanor of John Boehner, the innovative thinking of Sarah Palin.
No better, more effective local advocate for what the Tea Party is really about
could be imagined.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 02:23 PM
emptynewsroom,
Are you serious? Our poor are the richest poor in the world.
Infant mortality?! We have the best neonatal care in the world. Look at Cottage Hospital. Have seen where the ladies in England have to give birth in hallways? Poor public education?! How much money do we need to throw at the schools to educate our kids? We are second highest in the world for $/child. Maybe if it wasn’t for the teachers unions, we could hire and fire to get the best! Forclosures?! What caused that?! Surely not the reinvestment act?!!!? Let’s regulate the banks and force them to give loans to people with no stated income! Of course banks always did that, right? Never needed 10 to 20 percent down and an income to prove you can make your payments. Banks just loaned to anybody and everybody so they could stay in business?!? They were forced by your Franks, Dodds and Waters of the world as they were espousing that everything is just fine! Have you ever looked at European unemployment? They always average 15% or more, even worse when they try to create “green jobs”! Seems we were at 4.5% a few years ago before the mortgage industry finally failed, which was caused by those mentioned above! And they still want to give more! The Tea Party are people who want common sense to take over and hopefully the next elections will reflect that.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.02.10 @ 02:57 PM
Coastal Local: Yeah, taht’ll work, bring back the Party of Bush and Cheney. Your grasp of reality is very weak when it comes to the poverty rate, Wall Street caused economic collapse, cost of health care and all the other issues that have come crashing down since the two terms of an unelected president and his corrupt administration. Here’s some advice: travel, read, think and grow aware of what’s going on. Unless you’re a multi-millionaire, be very worried should the GOP ever get anywhere near to running the nation again.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 09:01 AM
Sounds like a number of folks in The Peoples’ Republic of Santa Barbara are scared to death of the Tea Party (not to mention being so obsessed with hate-spewing name-calling that they are incapable of posting a rational argument).
News Flash: Diana Thorn is about as far right as you are far left. In spite of the socialist tendencies of a few, this is a center-right country. THAT is why Obama’s health care bill failed - too much big government. Get over it.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 10:20 AM
Locked Into Backward Thinking: Despite what the GOP slime machine continually insists and the Tea Baggers want to believe, the U.S. is not now and has not been a “right of center country” for many years and may never have been. Read and learn: http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/pdf/progressive_majority.pdf
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 10:32 AM
emptyhead. This is too easy. It is amazing how clueless you children are. Predictably ignorant and while highlighting how morally bankrupt and racist you wannabe uber-lefts are. Now as for your lies, you really do need to do your own thinking:
Let’s take these one at a time. I would not want you tax your comprehension level. Pay attention now.
“The U.S. has poverty levels not seen in any other industrialized nation?”
Most government reports indicate that poor Americans today are better housed, better fed, and own more personal property than average Americans throughout most of this century. Today, inflation-adjusted expenditures per person among the lowest-income one-fifth of households (you know…the one you live in) equal those of the average American household in the early 1970s.
The following are facts about persons defined as being in poverty by the Census Bureau. To help emptyhead understand - The Census Bureau is that government department that counts things.
In 1995, 41 percent of all poor households owned their own homes.
The average home owned by a person classified as being impoverished has three bedrooms, one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
Only 7.5 percent of poverty households are overcrowded. Nearly 60 percent have two or more rooms per person.
This following fact is just for you Lenin loving, Cloward and Plevin suck ups. The average poor American has one-third more living space than the average Japanese does and four times as much living space as the average Russian.
Seventy percent of impoverished households own a car; 27 percent own two or more cars.
Ninety-seven percent have a color television. Nearly half own two or more televisions.
Nearly three-quarters have a VCR; more than one in five has two VCRs.
Two-thirds of impoverished households have air conditioning. By contrast, 30 years ago, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Sixty-four percent of the poor own microwave ovens, half have a stereo system, and over a quarter have an automatic dishwasher.
As a group, the impoverished are far from being chronically hungry and malnourished. In fact, impoverished persons are more likely to be overweight than are middle-class persons. Nearly half of poor adult women are overweight.
Despite frequent charges of widespread hunger in the United States, 84 percent of the poor report their families have enough food to eat; 13 percent state they sometimes do not have enough to eat, and 3 percent say they often do not have enough to eat.
The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children, and in most cases is well above recommended norms.
Children in poverty actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes that are 100 percent above recommended levels.
Most poor children today are in fact super-nourished, growing up to be, on average, one inch taller and ten pounds heavier that the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II.
By the way my lady says she loves Tea Baggers…since they are the only one’s who seem to have any balls. So if you want to call me a Tea Bagger, thanks. Yep, I’m a Tea Bagger and proud of it. Daniel Petry
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 11:03 AM
Daniel Petry: Glad to hear things are so much better than I and many economists thought, not to mention Fox News commentators who think the nation is disintegrating before our eyes. I can’t help but wonder though, if everything is so rosy (I notice you don’t mention the UK, Canada, Australia and western European nations so much in your comparisons) exactly WHY are disenfranchised folks like the Tea Baggers so upset in the first place? Also, there really isn’t a single capitalistic society that doesn’t have a significant amount of “socialism” within it, including the U.S., so you can leave the Marxist-Leninist tone out of your argument - it just makes you seem shrill.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 12:14 PM
Diana, good article. It’s humorous how the infants are so afraid of the Tea Party.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 01:05 PM
Emptyhead. “High infant mortality rates, poor public education and untrained workers too?” God this is way too easy. I bet you support sub-par teacher qualifications and the tyranny of teachers unions, continued funding of poor performance schools, the teaching of multiculturalism, allowing illegals into our schools, and then you you say “poor public education?” Would you be for school vouchers? I think not. Would you support the right of parents to fire an entire school staff? I think not. So go on down the road, you have no solutions since you are the problem. As your god says, “Just sit down, shut up, and get out of the way.”
As for high infant mortality rates. Are you just reading these talking points? Or have you actually done any valid research? The canard that the US has a high infant mortality rate gets trotted out every time some idiot wants to bash American health care. Now I know that you are not one to let facts get in the way of your pedantic dribble. Here is the truth.
The United States uses the WHO (emptyhead, WHO stands for World Health Organization) definition of live birth. Most countries do not. When you take this into account, the rates of low birth weight babies born in America are better than most developed countries. Likewise, infant mortality rates, adjusted for the distribution of newborns by weight, are about the same.
American advances in medical treatment now make it possible to save babies who would have surely died only a few decades ago. Until recently, very low birth-weight babies - less than 3 pounds - almost always died. Now, some of these babies survive. While such vulnerable babies may live with advanced medical assistance and technology, low birth-weight babies, weighing less than 5.5 pounds, recently had an infant mortality rate 20 times higher than heavier babies, according to WHO. But U.S. doctors’ ability to save babies’ lives causes higher infant mortality numbers here than would be the case with less advanced treatment. Remember it’s because of our barbaric health care system. You know, the one where top level Canadians come to get heart surgery because we are so backward and primitive. Especially when compared to Canada and your paradise – Cuba.
Because of varying standards, international comparisons of infant mortality rates are improperly used to create myths about how the United States should allocate local or national resources.
If we want to lower our infant mortality rate so it compares better with that of other countries, maybe we should align our rules with theirs to better determine the actual extent of the alleged problem.
Untrained workers too? It is good to see that you and FDR both agreed that illegals need to be deported to their countries of origin. Good job on that one. Daniel Petry
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 01:39 PM
Daniel Petrie: Methinks doth protest too much. Again, if everything is so darn-tooting wonderful in the last bastion of democracy (ha!), then why all the handwringing by the GOP, Fox News and the right wingers? The coffers have been pillaged by the Pentagon, the ruling elite and Wall Street with the result that the middle class is being shrunk more quickly than it grew just after WWII. As usual, fear and misinformation seem to be the last, best refuge of scoundrels who have already worn out the cloak of patriotism that have used to hide behind. I tend more each day to agree with Bill Kristol who said recently, “Americans don’t deserve health care.” To his comment I would add, “or informative news, fair elections, well paying jobs, corruption-free elected representatives, or a third party, which might be the only thing that can save them now.”
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 01:55 PM
emptyhead, you are just full of one liners and old, over used talking points. Let’s ignore the A.D.D. and stick to your original comments. Try to focus rather than rant it will help make your case.
“Millions of middle class taxpayers without access to health care?” Prove it. Really….prove it. Give us pure government statistics, not Huffington Post or Pelosi BS. First define the middle class, then prove that millions of them do not have access to health care. Prove it son.
“Losing their homes to foreclosure?” An amazing thing happens when you never had to underwrite your home with a down-payment and you could get a mortgage with stated income. When your lie comes face to face with financial reality….you lose the home you couldn’t afford in the first place. Too bad. Go back to renting.
“And the highest unemployment rates in over half a century?” Yes we can thank Obamanomics for that. But then you would not understand economics in the first place. So why should I waste time trying to educate you. Daniel Petry
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 02:34 PM
Daniel Petry: I really wish I could determine what your point is in refuting the plain fact that America, with a lot of help from politicans from both parties, is living far beyond its means, is hamstrung with a broken system and is heading for disaster. $1 trillion a year on military expenditures? Graduates increasingly ill-equipped to go head to head with kids in India, China and elsewhere. Lobbyists and special interest groups corrupting our elected representatives. Fortune 100 companies that can’t compete because of health insurance costs and bankrupt pension funds. Openly rigged elections (voter caging) and third-rate journalism that speaks looks out for its coorporate owners’ interests more than the public’s. I know that as a staunch patriot hearing these facts is painful and you’d prefer they don’t exist. The odd thing is, you have written about all this in Noozwhawk as a columnist already. Its okay for you to state this reality, but no one else?
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 03:13 PM
emptynewsroom, prior to this comment you were using far left talking points. That is my problem. Look, the entire system is broken. In fact it is gone. It is the result of both parties and the voters - you and I.
Now you may think that calling someone a Tea Bagger is a derogatory statement about a group of very concerned citizens. Citizens that come from all sides of the political spectrum. But it’s not. When I tell you that the Tea Party movement is NOT a third party movement you can believe me. Individuals within those groups just want this country to change direction and stop going down the road to hell. My god do you really think we can handle $100,000,000,000,000,000 in unfunded mandates, especially when the world has a GDP of only half that. We can’t. That is all these people are saying. Stop the spending…all the spending, shrink the government, get rid of these abhorrent policies that will take your freedom away. So don’t refer to them in some derogatory manner and just listen…you may learn something.
If that is what you are really saying….then welcome to the people’s revolution. I don’t care if you are a democrat, republican, or an independent. Come join us and fight for your country. Daniel Petry
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 03:37 PM
Emptyhead, you use research that calls itself unbiased but is full of the most absurd bias I have ever read (really, Media Matters, are you kidding me?). Get a clue will you? If I ask my kid if they want candy they will say “yes I do”. If I ask a voter if they want free government benefits I will get the same answer. Now if your marvelous unbiased commie professors at two well known left wing indoctrination camps asked people “do you want big government even if you can’t pay for it and even if it causes economic suffering later?” What do you think the answer would be? Of course your enemies those nasty ole conservatives have done such polling in response to this very kind of “targeted” research and guess what, genius? That’s right, if you ask the right questions you get the answer you want. Both sides do it. Just because you got an answer you targeted for does not make the country “progressive”.
But here is the question you should ask yourself. Forget Europe and all other socialist places, you don’t live there and most likely won’t. Instead think of your country as one big messy family. The manufacturing, extraction and agriculture sectors are the breadwinners, they bring home the bacon and they are the mom and dad. Government is your nanny. We conservatives are your older brother, still in school but working outside the house and trying to help dad with the income (entrepreneurs, small businesses, capitalists). You are the whiny little brother and sister who thinks by doing chores and earning an allowance that you are contributing to the household income (you may be helping with the labor but your allowance is a drain on the family income). You constantly complain that your older brother has more stuff and you should get more too. So mom and dad are attacked every day when they come home by you and the nanny, “we want more”. Meanwhile they tell dad his boots are dirty, his tools clutter the house and he needs to sleep outside because he snores. Mom isn’t fashionable enough or hip like your neighbors across the street. They are sick now and are not able to work as long and hard so the money is not coming in, even with older brother’s contribution. Nanny says no problem we have credit cards to make up the difference.
So what shape is our house in Emptyhead? Mom and dad are sick and dying, older brother is about to say screw you and go off on his own, leaving you and the nanny to fend for yourself with a load of debt you cannot pay back. Are you ready, spoiled, snot nosed, entitlement minded, whining crybaby jackass who complains but has no freaking clue how it works or how to work? When the money making end of our economy is taxed to death, the movers and shakers give up and go somewhere else you have nothing but a useless nanny and a crybaby left. Oh, what will you do?
No offense to you nannies out there or government. No offense to you whiny liberal/progressives either just want you to realize who butters the bread and on which side. And yes, I did not make government “head of the household”. Sorry to all you love government types but the head of the house is he who brings home the food and pays the rent and that ain’t yer nanny.
BTW – keep up the good work Diane and Dan!
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.05.10 @ 12:21 PM
emptynewsroom: Do you ever read anything published outside Santa Barbara? Try the LA Times, Newsweek, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times. ALL of them have quoted research indicating that the US is a right of center country and has been for decades. You’re living in la la land. Do a litte research before spouting off.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.05.10 @ 12:50 PM
I’m not sure why folks of a conservative bent are so riled up these days but here’s a suggestion. Why not insist your government provide you with basic services that are largely taken for granted in most civilized nations (you know, national health care, exceptional public education, trustworthy elections, an intelligent national energy policy, consumer protection laws, anti trust legislation, safe food, water and air, world class airports, rail, mass transit and infrastructure) instead of watching like sheep as they blow all your money on defense, pork projects and other forms of corruption. The degree that the U.S. citizenry is uninformed and complacant is simply mind boggling. That is, until you consider how third rate and fake the news is that is spewed forth by the corporations that now run the country. As Jon Stewart once said to Tucker Carlson on CNN’s Crossfire: “You’re hurting the nation. Just stop.” Luckily for the ruling class, the feds and big business, there is almost no chance anyone is going to wake up any time soon. Now, go back to attacking “liberals” and anyone else actually trying to move the country into the 20th century. (This is where you post angry responses telling me I hate America and that I should leave the country.)
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.05.10 @ 01:24 PM
emptynewsroom - I’m beginning to think you are bi-polar. Seriously. You want small government then big government. You just need to get your sctick together. Daniel Petry
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.05.10 @ 02:27 PM
The problem with the political debate today is that too many people are anti government when what they should be insisting on is good governance. Few presidents grew government and the nation’s debt more than Ronald Reagan ($1.3 trillion debt to over $3.5 trillion) and George Bush (while delivering almost nothing to the voter and taxpayer) and yet they’re held up as examples of “fiscally responsible small government” leaders. Couple that with asinie statements like the nation is on the “precipice of disaster…as a result of more than 100 years of progressive policies” (what, the GOP has had no power since 1900?) and you can see why the country is so polarized. A third or even fourth political party, the abolishment of campaign financing and an end to all lobbying and the transparancy of a parliamentary system are the only things that can get the country back on track. None of these things are likely to happen, of course.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.06.10 @ 05:14 PM
Dear Mr. Locke, and fellow Tea Party supporters,
I DO read the Journal, the Economist, the Times (both coasts), and many others
both for work my work and personal edification.
Wall Street Journal Eco-Business summit keynoter Amory Lovins pointed out
Friday that there’s a huge gulf between the OPINIONS of the Journal’s bizarre
editorial board, and the FACTS the Journal’s prize-winning news staff reports.
Lovins also pointed out that such traditional conservative Republican values as
conservation of scarce resources, and improved efficiencies within the private
and public sectors, are probably ultimately more important than a debate about
the “virtues” of oil, gas, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, etc.
If people objectively examine where the National Debt and the annual budget
deficits ballooned totally out of control, one sees that the first, big post-
WW II bump was after the Reagan tax cuts.
The second, biggest in American history, happened under the Bush-Cheney-Greenspan-Hastert-Frist regime. All - ostensibly - conservative, mainstream Republicans.
Tea-Party adherents lament the “tax and spend” policies of the donkey party,
and rightly so.
Why are so many so blind to the “spend and spend” policies of the elephant
group? It’s easy to be repelled by Pelosi’s wheeling and dealing. But…
Two foreign wars, each 500% above original estimate, both funded off-budget?
A Bush II tax-cut with no parallel reduction in federal spending to make
up the revenue losses? Come on, friends.
The question is, why was the Tea Party faction of the Republican Party so silent
while all this was happening, and now so lively and vocal about the young guy
who just came in to clean up the big mess, one year after the “spending party”
ended?
That does not sound or look very consistent, bi-partisan or non-partisan to me.
Can good Mr. Locke demonstrate that our local Tea Party leaders read anything weightier than the “Collected Thoughts of Rush Limbaugh”? I’d be interested to
find out what.
Published and posted comments coming out under the local Tea Party name suggest otherwise.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 02:54 PM
Publius, no one is questioning the exorbitant spending habits of Bush and Co. The GOP suffered quite a backlash in 2006 as a result. All this argument shows is all politicians are tax and spend, liars, cheats and thieves, all of them. You and your liberal/progressives keep looking at the two teams and seeing they are the same and calling us conservatives hypocrites. No Publius we are not. We also punish our team when they stray from our principles even while they delude themselves into thinking that’s not what happened.
The Tea Party is made up of the same people who voted against or not at all for the GOP in 2006 and 2008. They are the same people who voted for Obama in 2008 and then realized that this guy was the Chicago mobster the right warned them about. They realized this guy had an ideological agenda and anyone not a liberal progressive was an idiot and in the way. You and many liberal/progressives have made the stupid error in assuming that a grassroots movement not rooted in socialism or paid for by George Soros is phony. You insulted, besmirched and lorded over these Tea Party people and basically chased them into the dark clutches of the RNC. Had you embraced the common message Tea Partiers were saying then you might have had a small chance at swaying them your way. But let’s face it Publius, most of the rotten economy we have today is the result of 40 years of socialist creep in our government and economy and that creep as been ushered by BOTH parties.
BTW – you ought to listen to Rush some time. I don’t get the chance very often but when I do the man makes a lot of sense. Can’t understand why that bothers you liberals so much.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 05:06 PM
“Socialist creep?” How about the nation’s slide into “mild fascism”, as a prominent Republican called our position on the political spectrum a few years ago (Ron Paul)? Why is it some people like to think all of our ills are the result of a “liberal” agenda? As far as I can tell, the fallout we’re experiencing is much more due to right wing collusion with big business than any kind of progressive policies. Look at the facts: lax government regulation resulting in economic mayhem caused by Wall Street and the banking lobby, corporate welfare in the form of insane defense spending, pork barrel spending, stock fraud and ridiculous CEO compensation, corrupt federal contracting (Halliburton, Blackwater, etc.), total lack of consumer lending laws and protection leading to criminal behavior by health insurers and the credit card industry. Face it, none of this is due to the work of the left; all of it lies at the doorstep of radical right wing politicans like Nixon, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and pundits like Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, Kristol and all the others so adept at using fake patriotism and outrage for the common man to trick the less sophisticated among us to follow their corporate dictated platforms. Look at who funded the Tea Party movement originally, Dick Armey, a career politican who actually SUED to try to keep both his Cadillac Congressional pension and health insurance AND Social Security. “Socialism” seems to be quite attractive to Dick as long as it benefits him directly.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 09:13 PM
I agree. All conservatives, republicans, libertarians and anyone who does not hold the faith of progressives should be rounded up and herded into education camps. My god can you imagine a world where everyone knows that the someone else pays for them? Nirvana. Simply nirvana. Wait! We are in nirvana…we are in California.
I’ve been meaning to ask…can I borrow the keys to your condo? How about a dime? Daniel Petry
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
Weather: Fair 63.0º
Search Noozhawk »


