- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Latino Achievement Collaborative: We Support Restructuring Secondary GATE/Honors Courses
The Latino Achievement Collaborative is a coalition of local nonprofit organizations dedicated to educational equity and the academic success of Latino/a students. The Santa Barbara community has recently been focused on the Santa Barbara School District’s proposal to restructure GATE classes in secondary schools, including the removal of the designation of GATE from secondary classes and the creation of a rigorous Honors Program.
Our collaborative believes this is a proposal based on concrete research and sound educational practice that would strengthen academic programs for all students, including those currently enrolled in GATE classes. The proposed changes would have broad benefits because they would increase access to advanced coursework without sacrificing the high level of rigor in current GATE classes.
One of the reasons that we support the district’s proposal is because it would eliminate an unfair barrier that disproportionally prevents high-achieving first-generation college goers (that is, students who are the first in their family to potentially attend college) and Latino/a students from enrolling in advanced courses. The plan would re-designate GATE classes as Honors classes and maintain the same level of rigor in the courses. The proposal would create a consistent set of criteria to assess student readiness to participate in these classes (possibly to include GPA, GATE designation, teacher recommendation, and standardized test scores), rather than relying primarily on GATE designation and/or parental advocacy.
The proposed changes would help all parents ensure that their children have opportunities to participate in the most advanced, engaging and motivating classes for which they are qualified. This would be an important step forward in increasing equitable academic opportunities for all students, while preserving a program that offers rigorous instruction to advanced learners.
We have reviewed the evidence to support the proposal and found a strong case for the plan’s success. In particular, we are impressed by the data regarding the similar performance of GATE and non-GATE students in GATE classes and the fact that exemplary GATE programs throughout California do not offer specific GATE courses. GATE classes are not recognized by most colleges and students can be equally if not better prepared for higher education without attending GATE classes. The proposal is based on the successful example of La Cumbre Junior High, which uses criteria similar to that in the proposal to accept non-GATE-identified students into GATE classes. Finally, research shows that all students benefit — both academically and socially — from learning in classes that reflect the diversity of their school.
The Latino Achievement Collaborative has offered the programs and services of our member organizations to help the Santa Barbara School District’s plan succeed, including training opportunities for teachers, parents, and students. We believe that training and follow-up support for educators will be critical to successful implementation of the plan. We look forward to continuing to be a partner to SBSD schools in their efforts to achieve academic equity and success for all students.
— The Latino Achievement Collaborative is represented by Linda Güereña, coordinator, Parent Project; Sal Güereña, president, United Parents-Padres Unidos; Raquel López, executive director, La Casa de la Raza; Marisela Márquez, executive director, UCSB Associated Students; Gabriela Rodríguez, program coordinator, Future Leaders of America; Jarrod Schwartz, executive director, Just Communities Central Coast; and Belén Seara, executive director, PUEBLO.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 03.01.10 @ 10:08 AM
This smacks of affirmative action. The best thing the Latino/a community can do for itself is to stop treating itself like they are helpless and stupid. Leave GATE alone and encourage your offspring to advance to the GATE goal. Achievement does not come from making excuses for lack of progress, it does not come from telling people they are too stupid to learn English, achievement comes from hard work and high expectations. Quit telling your people it’s ok to be second best, that we will dumb down education for them and expect less from them than others. This racist cultural malaise, that was brought about by affirmative action, has decimated and destroyed the black community and now it is being applied to Hispanics. For God’s sake don’t make the same error. The best practice the Latino/a community can take is to drop the racist, apartied attitude of being Latino/a and start practicing being an American first and foremost. People do not come to this country to colonize they come here to get away from whatever culture, ethnicity or government that repressed them. Dragging your ethnic and cultural baggage with you only ensures you will be enslaved by them permanently. We are a melting pot not a multicultural experiment. There are many multicultural places on this planet and none of them has one wit of a chance at survival.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.03.10 @ 11:41 PM
Good grief AN50, is there no topic upon which you don’t feel you are God’s gifted expert? Can’t you hold your hallucinogenic, borderline-racist blather for one second and perhaps consider that you may be out of your league? How many years have you taught GATE classes? How long have you been observing our schools *from within*? None, would be my guess.
Read the third and fourth paragraphs again, AN50. What’s being restructured is access, not curriculum.
You wouldn’t know this of course, but GATE identification happens in elementary school and it’s not fair to disallow highly intelligent and motivated adolescents a chance at more rigorous educational experiences just because of their language skills in elementary school, or because their parents were too busy to drive them back to school for the test. That’s the discriminatory part AN50, and you’re just being an insensitive jerk when you ignore this and kvetch about racial baggage. You’d be much better off clamming up and listening for a change, and other Noozhawk readers greatly benefit from your silence.
Furthermore calling classes “Honors” instead of “GATE” helps EVERY student in the class, because most college admissions offices don’t recognize the term GATE, whereas “Honors” courses are widely recognized as more challenging and rigorous. It is absurd to think that changing the name and opening up access to more motivated and intelligent students will somehow lower the level of rigor.
The LAC is right to step up and support the changes, as most of us in education do.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
Weather: Fair 57.0º
Search Noozhawk »
