Paul Burri: Twitter Is for Twits

It only serves to foster feeble attempts at communication

By | Published on 02.07.2010

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (8)
  • Share

In order to not be like my children, who when they were little didn’t like certain foods even though they had never tried them, I recently decided to join Twitter to see what all the fuss is about. Now that I have tried it, I think that — like lutefisk, poi or kimchee — I don’t think much of it.

Paul Burri
Paul Burri

For those of you who have not yet had the “privilege” of sending or receiving a tweet — a Twitter message — let me explain that it’s a free Internet instant communication system that allows you to send and receive short messages limited to 140 characters, such as “Hi. What’s up?” or “Not much. How about you?”

If you believe this is communication between two people, I can say only that Twitter is for you. For me, it’s akin to waving to my neighbor as he drives past my house. Or nodding to my other neighbor as he walks his dog by my house. That’s recognition, not communication.

I read somewhere recently that about 50 percent of college freshmen need to take a course in remedial English because they are unable to spell correctly or understand even the simplest of literature samples.

Jay Leno asked a young man recently, “Who wrote Handel’s Messiah?” The man answered, almost proudly, “I don’t read books.” I suspect Leno was talking to a Twitterer — or whatever they call themselves. It’s a pretty sad commentary about our educational system.

Akin to tweets are what I call “re-mails.” Those are the e-mails I keep getting from one old friend of mine who simply forwards on to me the e-mails he has received from someone else. I suspect that my friend considers that he is communicating with me by doing that. That is, until I notice I’m receiving the e-mail only because I happen to have just one of 147 other e-mail addressees to which he is forwarding stuff.

Years ago, shortly after I had moved to California from New York City, I used to write three- to four-page letters (yes, handwritten) to my several friends who were still living in New York City. I would address the letter to one of my friends, and after he read it, he would pass it along to the others. Apparently they were of interest to them because they passed them along each time. But I never received letters in response.

One day, a few years later, I called one of them — this was in the days when a long-distance phone call was expensive and a big deal — and he mentioned he wasn’t much for writing letters and that whenever he wanted to keep in touch, he would just call.

It was only after I hung up that I realized, “Hey! He never writes me, but he never calls me either.” That was the day I stopped writing to my friends in New York City.

Maybe one of these days he’ll tweet me.

— Paul Burri is an entrepreneur, inventor, columnist, engineer and iconoclast. He is not in the advertising business, but he is a small-business counselor with the Santa Barbara chapter of Counselors to America’s Small Business-SCORE. He can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 02.08.10 @ 08:38 AM

Having been in the education system for a few years, this commentary brings to light the lack of interest our students have in the language arts. Is it the teacher’s fault that a great number of our students dont’t have a love of reading or writing?  Is it the educational systems fault or publishers of children’s books, that there are so few titles or content of interest for our students?
I still firmly believe our future community begins at home.  When I was young, my mother joined book clubs not only for her enjoyment, but for my, and my three other siblings educational support. I grew to love the wonderful stories I heard and would attempt to read later and eventually I would begin to write my own stories.
Though I had no need to write long letters, since everyone important to me lived in SB, the love of writing became part of my communication skills wholly due to my love of reading.
I have past this love on to my children.  I read to them when they were young.  When money was tight and I couldn’t afford new books, I would either recite a story I’d read from my childhood or make up stories for them to hear at bedtime.  They loved recogizing themselves in the stories I would make up the best.
To this day, all three of my children, now adults, have favorite authors and take the time to sit with a book and read.  Often they like to visit and tell me about the book they just read.
When my eldest son was in Iraq, his letters home were thoughtful and full of requests for sour cream and onion Pringles and music I had recorded and played when he was little (Madonna, Neil Diamond, etc.). My letters were filled with the mundane daily routine of our family and parental pride. We kept our coorespondances and tucked them away in our repective ‘stashes’ of familial memoribillia. These letters, like baby clothes, baptismal candles, and pictures, have become a part of our family history.
Let’s not put too much on the ailing school system, though it too has a tremendous obligation and responsibility to our children.  The system can only put out what we as parents have put into our progeny, who eventually grow up and present for all the community to see, the values we placed in their education.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.08.10 @ 09:15 AM

Paul, you misunderstand the purpose of twits. It’s not “what’s up?” - “not much” type of communication. That’s cell phone texting. Twits are for letting your friends know what you’re doing at the moment. For example, “studying for math exam”, “shopping at Bloomingdale”, etc. It is indeed akin to what you call re-mails, a broadcast.
Those of your “followers” who are interested in your last twit, will comment, and a short two-way conversation might form, but again, the main purpose is informational.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.08.10 @ 09:15 AM

I don’t use Twitter very much, but think that you are missing some of the ways people use it. What I see most often is celebrity usage, as a way to update their fans on what they are doing in a short and simply format. i.e. Lindsay Lohan telling people that she is “Going to to be staring in new movie X” or something…

Useful? Maybe not to some people. Others seem to enjoy keeping tabs on people important to them. It is typically not used as an instant message service as you describe (i.e. “Hey John, how are you?”), as the most common use is to send mass public messages, not private messages, although they are an option.

Telling people what you are doing or thinking, who are interested in knowing these things, is certainly a form of communication, even if no one cares enough about you or me to follow these aspects of our life with interest.

Regarding sending letters, good for you! You do realize though that many people send unique emails to people, right? Not all emails are the generic messages you are supposed to forward to all of your friends that you are referring to here. One annoying area of email communication should not be used as a reason to cast out the whole technology. It would be like saying all mail is bad because sometimes I get junk mail I don’t want. Strange conclusion…

Why would you assume that someone who doesn’t read books is a Twitterer? It really sounds like you are making an unfounded assumption. Can you consider that the person in question may have been making a JOKE on LENO…?

You might want to learn a little (or a lot) more about email and twitter before writing pointed and uninformed articles about them. =)

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.08.10 @ 10:20 AM

I’m 49 years old and I hope to NEVER come across as old a fogie as Mr. Burri does in this article.
I use all the “new fangled doodads” of the moment and will continue to do so as long as it keeps me in touch with the world and those of us in it. I also read, instilled a love of reading and writing in my son, my step son, my nephew (in spite of the fact he has dyslexia!) and my nieces. SB Native pretty much hits that nail on the head.
Mr. Burri has apparently missed the FACT that Twitter was used extensively by people in Iran and Iraq to tell the world what was really going on over there. People share news and other interesting things they’ve found on the web as well as broadcasting what they’re up to at the moment.
I agree with “Not a Tweeter” in that Mr. Burri might do a bit more research before writing a piece about something he clearly doesn’t understand. But then, that’s the way of the old fogie…if you can’t understand it, it is useless and for twits.
As I am sure you were taught in your youth; if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.08.10 @ 11:26 AM

Paul, you only get to use “akin” once per column.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.08.10 @ 07:00 PM

YOU KIDS GET OFF MY LAWN!!!!!!!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.09.10 @ 05:59 PM

“Twits are for letting your friends know what you’re doing at the moment. For example, “studying for math exam”, “shopping at Bloomingdale”

After reading Michael’s explanation of the “real purpose” of tweeting, I tend to agree with Paul - Twitting is for twits. They must have some illusion that anybody really cares about hourly updates on your mundane existence.

Just what I need - a constant deluge of trivia from everyone I know. I have my own life thank you.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 02.11.10 @ 08:37 AM

There are two types of twitterers and they both fall into the category of having no life of their own:

Those who tweet and think anybody really cares about their dull lives, and those who follow that are really just stalkers with no interesting life of their own.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Paul Burri: Business Advice You Might Not Want to Hear

Some people claim to want help but either only want affirmation or aren't willing to make changes

Paul Burri: A Weekend with George — ALL of George

It goes without saying that he left nothing unsaid

Paul Burri: How to Improve Things Without Making Any Changes

You can’t fix a problem — the real problem — unless you know what it is

Paul Burri: Students Have a Lot to Learn About How to Earn a Living

Covering the ABCs of working in the real world with a group of inexperienced high-schoolers

Paul Burri: The Weekly Computer Report ... If Anyone Notices

Why waste valuable resources generating worthless information?

Weather: Fair 55.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive