- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Mona Charen: Beware of Democrats Bearing Gifts
The signs are all around us. Even as President Barack Obama and the Democrats lower their heads and prepare to bulldoze a huge new entitlement through Congress, the results of profligate government spending are apparent everywhere. It requires a prodigious degree of ideological blindness to miss this.

In Greece, decades of lavish spending on public employees and social programs have led to national bankruptcy. Greece’s budget deficit last year was 12.7 percent of GDP.
Want to know what an economic dead-end looks like? It looks like this: A socialist government is forced to try to adopt austerity measures on an infantilized citizenry gone soft and dependent. Public employees respond with strikes and violence. “Tax collectors began a two-day walkout,” the Sydney Morning Herald reports, “court employees launched a weeklong series of work stoppages and garbage collectors also mobilized against state spending cuts that are meant to save 4.8 billion euros ($6.5 billion).” These smaller walkouts fall between last week’s general strike and the general strike called for Thursday.
In related news, thousands of students and faculty took to the streets to protest cutbacks and tuition increases at the lavishly funded UC Berkeley. Arrests were made after about 200 students rioted, vandalizing a university building and lighting trashcans on fire. An ethnic studies professor at San Francisco State lamented the violence, explaining that it “casts a shadow on the majority of our students who are working constructively toward budget justice.”
No doubt many New Jerseyans also think of themselves as crusaders for justice. But last month, newly elected Gov. Chris Christie delivered a frank assessment of the need for budget continence: “There’s no time left. We have no room left to borrow. We have no room left to tax.” New Jersey, he warned, is “on the verge of bankruptcy.”
New Jersey faces a $68.9 billion long-term liability for retiree health care and other benefits, one of the steepest obligations of any state, but hasn’t set aside the funds to cover it. The recession played a role in bringing New Jersey’s woes to a head. But part of competent government is planning for contingencies.
Consider what even the liberal Newark Star-Ledger acknowledged: “We have the highest-paid police officers in the country, and they can retire after 25 years at 65 percent of their highest salary. We have the nation’s highest-paid firefighters, too. Salaries for our teachers are always at the top of the nation, or close to it. And most pay nothing for red-carpet health benefits for life.
“This year, in the middle of a punishing recession — when more than 10 percent of New Jerseyans are out of work, when others are having their pay and hours cut, when many are losing homes to foreclosure — teachers’ average base salaries rose by nearly 5 percent, double the rate of inflation.”
Unlike most private-sector employees, New Jersey police officers can cash in on unused sick days. A retiring New Brunswick officer received $376,234 for unused sick days, on top of his annual $115,000 pension. It’s a common pattern. New Jersey has run itself into a ditch, led by liberal Democratic office holders and their public union backers/beneficiaries.
New Jersey is one of the worst offenders (along with California, Florida, Michigan and a few more), but nearly all states are facing a shortfall. The Pew Center on the States found a $1 trillion gap at the end of fiscal year 2008 between the $2.35 trillion states had set aside to pay for employees’ retirement benefits and the $3.35 trillion price tag of those promises.
“While the economic crisis and drop in investments helped create it,” said Susan Urahn, the study’s director, “the $1 trillion gap is primarily the result of states’ inability to save for the future and manage the costs of their public-sector retirement benefits.”
At the federal level, the government has undertaken promises in the form of Social Security and Medicare that amount to $107 trillion in 2009 dollars. And while the future obligations under Medicare get plenty of ink, the costs of the Medicaid program (which, because of elastic eligibility standards, winds up providing nursing-home care for many middle-class elderly people in addition to the poor) may eventually dwarf its sister programs.
Last week, the Congressional Budget Office projected that if Obama’s budget is adopted (without the health-care bill), the national debt will grow by $9.7 trillion over the next decade. And what we need, at this critical juncture, the Obama administration insists, is a huge new entitlement.
Beware of Democrats bearing Greek-like gifts.
— Mona Charen writes for Creators Syndicate. Click here for more information or to contact her.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 03.09.10 @ 05:34 PM
Trial lawyers and unions have paid off our liberals democrats in power—puppets of the union..
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 08:36 AM
Yep, Mona, some people just don’t get it, we’re broke.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 12:22 PM
We are broke due high spending but also low revenues. Corporations have a 35% tax rate but only pay an average of 12% due to all the tax loopholes. Also, corporations only paid 7% of all taxes in 2009, a record low. This in the face of very high profits. Put that together with the estimated $500 billion per year of unpaid taxes due to cheating that that gets you part of the way there. The other part is spending and starting with the defense department’s bloated budget would be a good idea. On the entitlement side why not move back age that triggers receiving benefits such as Social Security and tighten the screws on Medicare Fraud. I loved the Bounty Hunter Bill that Obama passed yesterday. This is where private entities that find medicare fraud are entitled to part of the savings. So on balance this is partly a benefits and spending problem but it is also a disportionate burden on people, not corporations to pay taxes. A good example of that is that the oil companies in California pay no extraction tax, however, in every other state they do. That is estimated to be $3 billion of lost revenue.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 02:37 PM
Local, we are broke because we spend more than we make, not as a government, homeowner, bank, oil company or individual, but as a country. Our net imports swamp our net exports; our entitlements exceed our ability to generate the wealth to cover them. And the only thing you can come up with is “well tax the bloody capitalists more” or “find more criminals and cheats.”
Good grief man you are asking the one entity that is the biggest collection of liars cheats and thieves to-
a) Guard the hen house
b) Find the foxes
c) And stop eating the eggs
Ah, Local government is the fox.
Man will you get it through that thick liberal damaged brain of yours that all the cheating going on will not pay back the $50 trillion in public and private debt we owe. Yes we should go after waste and fraud big time, but doing so does not pay the bill. Yes we should increase competition in the health industry and open up the SUPPLY so that demand can be met at a lower cost. But until we start extracting our own resources and growing our own food and fiber as well as making our own stuff we are still going into debt. That means less wealth to go around for crooks and legitimate enterprises, the poor and the rich, got it bub?
I tire of you Neanderthals constantly going back to the fictitious money tree every time you want something you can’t afford and are unwilling to earn. I have told you many times that it doesn’t matter the distribution system or who owns it (socialism vs capitalism), what matters is what you have in real wealth, resources, arable land and ability to make things. There is no magic bullet here Local. We have few resources left so we should double down on what we have. We have huge capability in arable land that is largely wasted and we pay subsidies to not grow and often grow the wrong things. Then we have the ability to make things but are so strung out on hatred of our industrial society that we have all but killed that too. I don’t question that we should manufacture cleanly and safely, but when we penalize local companies and then allow foreign companies who are not held to those standards to import tariff free then what do you expect to happen? Yes our ability to make things gets transferred off our soil and the economic expansion goes with it and any dream you have of a nanny state. Not even the nanny coddled socialists in Europe are that stupid. I don’t believe we are either, so there must be some other sinister reason why we have as a country decided to kill our ability to make wealth and along with it your desire for a nanny state.
It is not a partisan thing, a republican or democrat thing or a Local verses AN50 thing. It has been going on for 4 decades Local. It happened under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, both Bush’s, Clinton and now Obama. Both parties and all of us are responsible. But as long as the DNC and RNC continue to divide us on party lines and obfuscate the underlying problem we will not solve it. You and I have the smarts and the comprehension to get through this and make things better but not until we stop the bickering among us.
However, calling you names and bickering is a great relief for me so if that’s what you want then whatever.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 04:57 PM
An50, Wow what a rant. You get an award. I was merely pointing out some areas where we could improve and make a dent in the problem. You will get no argument out of me that we need to expand our economy, our productivity and production and manufactoring. I also agree that if a company can find cheap labor overseas, no environmental or humanitarian regulation then we will not be competitive.. The way we can get there is invest in our future through education, change NAFTA and other trade laws and try to hold other countries accountable. We could also not pander to the Chinese in terms of allowing them to artificially devalue their currency. Where we part is I do not think the answer is resource extraction. All you have to do is look at other countries that rely on that too much to solve their economy problems: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait,Russia and Nigeria and that is not the model you want. We can close the gap towards energy independance with a variety of actions such as solar, wind,nuclear, natural gas, efficiencies etc. We need to be the leader in progress on a variety of fronts and export our technology, inventions, machines, patents, medical cures etc to the rest of the world. We can leverage our great universities as the think tanks they are in working with the private sector. This will reverse our course and head us back towards the goal of a creditor nation.
See no name calling. I believe everyone should pay their fair and legal share of taxes. That said, without a strong middle class this country is in big trouble.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 05:57 PM
Yeah, that’s right - how dare taxpayers suggest that they should receive value for the money they pay in the form of income, sales and estate tax! Social Security, healthcare, excellent public education, a modern infrastructure, safe food, air and water and other socialist plots aren’t needed here! Why, our government has more important priorities such as spending over half its discretionary budget ($1 trillion+) annually on the military and wars. Our tax dollars are better off going into the sinkhole of the defense industry and other corporate welfare recipients like big oil and ag, pharma and sleazy rip-offs like the Wall Street bailouts and insurance and banking legislation favorable to big business and against the interests of the consumer. That’s why there is no government criminal more adept at sticking their hand into the taxpayer’s pocket and putting what they find into the coffers of their big business buddies than a Republican.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 03.10.10 @ 08:14 PM
Good Local. I like this, two political opposites, finally we see the same common problem. Yes I am a conservative/libertarian and you a liberal/progressive. So we differ on who controls the wealth, production and distribution in our economy, I favor private control and you public. I like small government and believe in self reliance and personal responsibility, you like your government big, believe in a communal reliance and would rather the responsibility be society’s. We are way different on these things. But we both realize that even if we were as obnoxiously over bearing on industry or any private enterprise as Europe is we still need that basic wealth in order to expand well being. The Europeans, for all the picking on them I do, ain’t that dumb. They too recognize the value of a basic manufacturing, extraction and agriculture economy. That’s why they practice, like all our global competitors do, the kind of protectionism to their industry our country scoffs at. They know they need that just to keep up with the entitlements. We just go to our fictitious money tree and bang there you have $50 trillion in debt.
BTW – most green energy is extraction. Don’t get hung up on your party’s antipathy toward the oil industry. Coal, natural gas, wind, solar and wave power are all forms of energy extraction. Iron ore, bauxite, gravel, gypsum, salt are examples of material extraction. The point is these resources are gold. They are material wealth. Manufacturing is a form of intellectual wealth, the ability and know how to turn those raw materials into useful durable goods. Agriculture is a combination of both intellectual know how and resource management.
All other forms of commerce, though needed to support the primary wealth generators, are not wealth in them selves. You can have a nation with doctors, nurses, teachers, lawyers, accountants, bankers, sales clerks, cops and government workers but you can not finance one with just those people. You still need farmers, miners, drillers, construction workers, technicians, assemblers, engineers and all the other folks who daily get their hands dirty doing what needs to be done to add wealth. Adding wealth ensures there is more to go around for all. Can you think of a better system EmptySuit?
Thanks for the engaging conversation Local.
Cheers!
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Wayne Mellinger: Triple Challenged Can’t Grapple with Their Demons Alone
For the homeless, the mentally ill and the addicted, society needs to step up with institutional help
George Runner: New Tax Interpretation Will Help Farmers Switch to Solar Power
California Board of Equalization clarifies exemption, ensuring its availability for agricultural expenses
Patty DeDominic: What’s On the Minds of High Achievers?
Take control of 2012 with a look at your health, wealth and time management
Adam Probolsky: Voters Are Receptive to Raising Local Revenues
Recent elections indicate voters don't lump in local government with institutional dysfunction in Sacramento and Washington
Helene Schneider: Mayor’s Year-End Message to Santa Barbara Community
There were many accomplishments in 2011 for which the city's residents can be proud, with much work still to be done in 2012
Weather: Fair 48.0º
Search Noozhawk »


