- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Wayne Mellinger: Changing Your Holiday Shopping Practices
Black Friday, the day after Thanksgiving, is now the official start of the Christmas shopping season. While the phrase ”Black Friday” originally emerged in the 1960s to refer to the heavy traffic on the streets of Philadelphia on this day, today it is usually described as the point at which retailers begin to turn a profit — or become “in the black.” Unfortunately, it is also a day noted for the unruly crowds of shoppers who flood stores, even trampling employees to death in stampedes.
In 1991, Adbusters Magazine declared this day ”Buy Nothing Day” and urged us to consider how dependent we are on conspicuous consumption.
My active engagement with anti-consumerism began in 1997 when I watched John de Graaf and Vivia Boe’s one-hour groundbreaking movie Affluenza, which aired on PBS. This event brought the topic of consumerism to a much wider audience and vastly increased public awareness.
Since then I have continued to use this film in my classes at Ventura College and at Antioch University Santa Barbara. Affluenza has been defined as “a painful, contagious, socially transmitted condition of overload, debt, anxiety and waste resulting from the dogged pursuit of more” (de Graaf, 2001, Affluenza: The All-Consuming Epidemic).
Today, the anti-consumer movement has grown tremendously as evidenced by the number of communities worldwide who have joined the protests of the Occupy movement (more than 2,600, according to Wikipedia). Adbusters, a Canadian activist group partly inspired by the Arab Spring, played a central role in the organization of the movement.
Using the slogan, “We are the 99 percent,” the Occupy movement draws attention to the class structure of our global economy and to the massive concentration of wealth among the top 1 percent of income earners. Sociologists have long known that the top 10 percent of Americans own roughly 90 percent of our country’s wealth, but now more people are learning this fact.
We are not a nation of consumers. We are a nation of citizens, and I urge you to contemplate the difference before you begin your holiday shopping. We need to take back the power that we have given to massive corporations who have ceased to be concerned about us. This holiday season I want to urge you to break some of your typical spending habits, and to consider some alternatives.
Rather than shopping the way you usually do, stop for a moment and contemplate the (often unintended) consequences of your actions, and consider the ethics involved in your purchase. When we change our behavior and put our values into action, we engage in a process that philosophers sometimes refer to as praxis.
Praxis is an ongoing process of action-reflection in which our conduct is brought into alignment with our intentions. When we switch off that “auto pilot” that seems to run so much of our lives and act with conscious awareness, we have the ability to make the world a better place.
The very first step that we all need to do is to accept responsibility for the state of our social world and of our planet. If corporations that are “bad citizens” have so much power, it is because we gave it to them. Rather than focusing on saving a few dollars on some item that is important from some faraway place and is made under sweatshop conditions, buy something a little less expensive made locally by people in your community.
Today we increasingly understand that the features of our social world are the direct consequence of our collective actions. This “reflexive” awareness that we make the world compels us to act with intention. When we re-evaluate our patterns of consumption, and thus our patterns of shopping, and choose to alter these based upon knowledge of how corporations rule the world, we are doing praxis.
If you want to create a world in which massive corporations that act without compassion diminish in power, you need to re-evaluate the ethics of the companies with which you do business. An important step is to consider how any given corporation you do business with contributes to the social ills and ecological devastation of our world.
This might entail examining the differences between the salaries of top executives and their pension plans and those of the average worker. What is the quality of health insurance offered to workers? What level of worker participation exists and/or the state of union relations? Does this company openly share its environmental impact and plans to attain sustainability? How does this company recruit women, people of color and those with physical or mental challenges? How is the company ranked by the Better Business Bureau and what types of litigation is the company involved? What types of child care and other family supports are given to new mothers and fathers? Do lesbian, gay men and transgender people have rights that are protected? What do the workers themselves say about their working conditions? Does the organization support nonprofit agencies in its local communities? These are some of the questions one might ask about the ethics of any corporation.
While this might take a little bit of time, in our age of instant Internet information, this type of research is only a few clicks away. Wikipedia has a whole entry on “ethical consumerism” that lists various “ratings tables.”
Rather than going to the mall and shopping at Macy’s, Walmart or Toys R Us, or going online and shopping with Amazon, Sears or Best Buy, consider some of the following alternative gift-giving and holiday shopping practices:
» Buy from smaller, local retailers.
» Buy from green companies that promote ecological sustainability.
» Buy from local artists and craftspeople.
» Buy organic.
» Give generously to a local nonprofit in the name of a loved one.
The important thing to do is to stop and contemplate your actions. Moreover, do not do this alone. Talk to your neighbors, your fellow church-goers or others you know in your community.
Let us recast how we spend our money for the holidays. Think about whether the person you are giving to really needs any more stuff. Seize this opportunity to support local jobs, our nation’s economy and our planet.
When we act with intention and do what is best for our country and our planet, we can change the world. Praxis is a simple process that forces us to contemplate the ethical consequences of our actions. When we spend our money wisely, we change the world.
Continue to be generous, and share your gifts with the world — just change the places you get those gifts.
— Wayne Mellinger, Ph.D., is a social justice activist living in Santa Barbara and social worker for the homeless. He was appointed by county Supervisor Doreen Farr to the South Coast Homeless Advisory Committee and is a board member of Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE).
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
More Local News »
Ric Oberlink: Attrition Through Enforcement, Not Amnesty
The worst response to illegal immigration would be to counteract the message we are already starting to send
Susan Deacon: School Funding the State Can’t Take Away
Parcel-tax Measures W and X on June 5 ballot would ensure revenue stays local
Lou Segal: Parcel-Tax Measures W and X Won’t Improve Our Schools
Without fundamental reform, no amount of money will fix long-standing problems
Jack Friedlander: SBCC, School Districts Collaborate to Promote Academic, Career Success
Get Focused, Stay Focused! Initiative aims to help all students find a clear educational pathway
George Runner: Proposition 29 Another Grab for Dollars with No Accountability to Taxpayers
The measure would raise nearly $1 billion in taxes each year, but would do nothing to solve the budget deficit or control spending
Weather: Partly Cloudy 51.0º
Search Noozhawk »
