Adam Probolsky: Voters Are Receptive to Raising Local Revenues

Recent elections indicate voters don't lump in local government with institutional dysfunction in Sacramento and Washington

By | Published on 12.20.2011

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (1)
  • Share

Americans are unhappy with state and federal government in general. The topic of taxes would seem to trigger intense voter backlash.

Adam Probolsky
Adam Probolsky

However, cities, counties and special districts considering placing new revenue measures on the ballot in 2012 could by surprised by a receptive electorate. California voters largely support local tax increases and local elected officials often face little Election Day consequence for voting to raise them.

Seventy-five percent of ballot measures to increase, revise, expand or extend local taxes, fees or bonds passed in the November 2011 California elections. Voters are clearly willing to impose new taxes on themselves.

This reflects a distinction between local and statewide realities. Regional revenue measures stand a significantly better chance of success at the polls than do statewide measures. The public’s dissatisfaction with, and distrust of, state government in Sacramento does not typically extend to local and regional government agencies.

Voters tend to think of their city or community as generally being on the right track (with the occasional “city of Bell” exception). This contrasts starkly with the majority who generally feel that the nation is on the wrong track (and in many states — California in particular — that their state is on the wrong track).

The following example is taken from a recent survey our company, Probolsky Research LLC, conducted on behalf of a medium-sized Southern Californian city. Two-thirds of voters feel their city is on the right track, and 63 percent approved of the job that their mayor and city council are doing:

Probolsky Research-Right Track/Wrong Track
(Probolsky Research graphic)

Probolsky Research-City Leadership Job Approval
(Probolsky Research graphic)

Voters are considerably more likely to:

» Be content with their community and invested in its future

» Regard their local government leadership as credible

» Be more receptive to a local agency or elected officials as a messenger

The key persuader for voter receptivity to local taxes? Knowing that new revenues are protected from “cash-grabs” by Sacramento.

All this does not mean that passing new taxes is a cakewalk. Thirteen out of the 53 local revenue measures on the November 2011 ballot failed. Our company’s research shows that for local revenue measures to succeed, voters need to achieve comfort in several key areas:

» There must be a pressing need for the money such as dilapidated roads or the threat of severe cutbacks like library or park closures or public safety layoffs.

» Alternatives such as seeking grants, internal cost savings and concessions from labor have been exhausted.

» Proper oversight will ensure that the new revenue will be spent as promised. (We encourage citizen oversight committees and full spending transparency on a unique and easy-to-read Web site.)

» The agency’s existing funds are being well managed and the budget is sustainable.

— Adam Probolsky is chairman and CEO of Newport Beach-based Probolsky Research LLC, a full-service opinion research organization serving government, corporate and special-interest clients. This commentary originally appeared on PublicCEO.com and is republished with permission.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 12.20.11 @ 06:24 PM

Other than for school bonds or roads I can not think of a tax that local voters have approved.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

Ric Oberlink: Attrition Through Enforcement, Not Amnesty

The worst response to illegal immigration would be to counteract the message we are already starting to send

Susan Deacon: School Funding the State Can’t Take Away

Parcel-tax Measures W and X on June 5 ballot would ensure revenue stays local

Lou Segal: Parcel-Tax Measures W and X Won’t Improve Our Schools

Without fundamental reform, no amount of money will fix long-standing problems

Jack Friedlander: SBCC, School Districts Collaborate to Promote Academic, Career Success

Get Focused, Stay Focused! Initiative aims to help all students find a clear educational pathway

George Runner: Proposition 29 Another Grab for Dollars with No Accountability to Taxpayers

The measure would raise nearly $1 billion in taxes each year, but would do nothing to solve the budget deficit or control spending

Weather: Partly Cloudy 51.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive