McCammon Driven to Reconnect Council, Constituents

From building heights to budgets and gangs, candidate says Santa Barbara's priorities need an adjustment

Santa Barbara council candidate Cathie McCammon calls land use her primary interest and says she's attended most of the Plan Santa Barbara workshops, which are part of the city's general plan update process.
Santa Barbara council candidate Cathie McCammon calls land use her primary interest and says she’s attended most of the Plan Santa Barbara workshops, which are part of the city’s general plan update process. “I don’t like the direction that’s going,” she notes, citing potential over-development and strained resources. (Bob Blackwell photo / www.bobblackwellphoto.com)

By | Published on 09.27.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (14)
  • Share

The perceived disconnect between residents and the Santa Barbara City Council motivated Cathie McCammon to enter the race for one of three council seats up for grabs Nov. 3. She’s one of 13 candidates on the ballot, and many of them have the same sentiment.

“We really need a change. They’ve really lost touch with people,” McCammon said of the current council. “I’ve heard it from all kinds of people on all different issues that City Hall just isn’t listening.”

A 37-year resident of Santa Barbara, McCammon is a retired attorney who’s been involved with the Santa Barbara League of Women Voters since 1972. She’s also served on the Harbor Commission, as vice president of the Allied Neighborhoods Association, and president and executive director of the Citizens Planning Association of Santa Barbara County.

She was also a member of the steering committee of Save El Pueblo Viejo, the group spearheading the Measure B ballot initiative that will ask voters to restrict downtown building heights to 40 feet.

According to McCammon, the disconnect between city organizations and residents became apparent when Save El Pueblo Viejo went before the council two years ago, asking it to put an ordinance on the books.

The ordinance was a reaction to the large, luxury condos that sprang up on Chapala Street, and the group asked the council to give the Planning Commission “the tools” it needed to say no to such projects, like height limits and setbacks.

The group’s proposition was turned down by the council, so it decided to take the issue to voters. Since the law prohibits multiple-issue ballot measures, the group decided that height limits were the most important element.

McCammon was part of the effort that gathered 12,000 signatures from residents to put the initiative on the ballot.

“I was amazed as we were gathering signatures how people really wanted low building heights,” she told Noozhawk. “They really wanted to preserve Santa Barbara’s character.”

McCammon said she doesn’t buy the argument that affordable housing will be placed in the downtown area if height limits are kept at 60 feet, either.

“What you have along the transit corridors are million-dollar condos,” she said, adding that she thinks developers have had plenty of time — since 1962, in fact, when the current height ordinance was introduced — to build affordable housing.

“Where is it?” she asked. “I haven’t noticed it.”

McCammon also rebuts the argument that height limits would push growth out, instead of up, causing sprawl.

“It seems to me that it’s the height of arrogance to assume that what happens in Santa Barbara will affect property owners in other jurisdictions,” she said, adding that Santa Barbara is bounded by the mountains and the ocean, limiting sprawl geographically.

A slow-growther, McCammon’s main interest is in land use, and she said she’s attended most of the workshops and updates for Santa Barbara’s general plan, Plan Santa Barbara.

“I don’t like the direction that’s going,” she said of the plan updates, which she said could potentially cause over-development and strained resources.

McCammon said a Plan Santa Barbara workshop addressing both housing and adaptive management was held Thursday, but the 100-page staff report was released the same day and only available in hard copy Sept. 21.

“How are people even supposed to read it, much less study it?” she asked. “At first, they would give us two weeks to look at these staff reports, and now it’s days.”

As far as the municipal budget is concerned, McCammon said she thinks the city has done enough one-time fixes, and that top priorities should remain public safety and infrastructure.

She’d also like to see public hearings when it’s not budget-crunch time to find out what people want to see as funding priorities. She said such hearings could be dispersed throughout the year.

The high cost of salaries and benefits are also a concern, she said.

As for layoffs of city staff, “It may have to happen,” she acknowledged, although she said salary cuts would be a better option.

Shifting to gang activity within the community, McCammon said she’d like to see the city make efforts with the school system and after-school programs to reach children at an earlier age and to work with parents.

“When you have the situation where children are killing children, you have to start really earlier,” she said.

McCammon said she doesn’t support an injunction for youth already involved in gangs. Older youth should have the opportunity to talk to rehabilitated gang members who have gone on to realize their full potential, she said.

She’s also compassionate toward the city’s homeless, many of which are veterans, and she called state and federal spending cuts for veterans facilities “a tragedy.”

“Half the homeless are wounded warriors,” she said. “We send people to war and we make it so that there’s a stigma to seek treatment for PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder).

“We’re just not taking care of them the way we ought to, and then we wonder why they end up on the streets.”

However, she’s very supportive of the city’s recently passed ordinance seeking to curb aggressive panhandling.

She also said she supports the “housing first” model of dealing with homelessness, and was complimentary of the city Housing Authority’s El Carrillo apartments, a collection of studios where the homeless live at reduced rent.

“But you can only do that for so many people. We just don’t have the resources, the money or the land,” she said. “And I don’t think any entity has totally solved the problem, and we need to keep trying.”

Noozhawk staff writer Lara Cooper can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.

  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
  4. Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
  5. Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
  6. Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 09.28.09 @ 07:38 AM

Cathie McCammon wants to “Bring people together”?  Ha! -  t’is to laugh - witness her statement about how arrogant people are who have different opinions from hers on urban land use. Yeah, that’s the way to bring people together, alright.

McCammon apparently still doesn’t get it that NOT building housing for local workers in SB forces them to find housing in distant communities.

She’s better equipped to work in a sandwich shop, she’s so full of baloney.


» on 09.28.09 @ 10:27 AM

Funny how politicians like an initiative to put something on the ballot when it is something they want a vote (building heights), but fight it when it is something they don’t want, but the people might want like (Paradon, Carpinteria).  Or…......changing a law when they worry about a senate seat so the republican governor can’t appoint the temporary positon (Massachusets, John Kerry presidential bid) and changing it back so the democratic governor can appoint the temporary position (death of Edward Kennedy). 
Amazing the double standards people get away with!


» on 09.28.09 @ 10:40 AM

Good points made, and I agree about Measure B and much of what she said about the General Plan - I was thinking about attending last week’s workshop, but couldn’t find online the staff report so as to be preparared for it (now I know why!)—-  but I can not support a candidate part of the Van Wolfswinkel slate of Francisco-Self-Hotchkiss and McCammon.


» on 09.28.09 @ 01:19 PM

Nope. She doesn’t get it. Totally out of touch with current issues and politics.

Unfortunately, they’ll be a lot of “Former Barbarians” if Measure B passes. Measure B will only further divide the “haves” from the “have nots”.


» on 09.28.09 @ 01:43 PM

How difficult it is to separate McCammon’s endorsement and association with the repressive slate with her expressed and informed concern about the real people of this town.  She deserves support and I will vote for her but to succeed she must do something to distance herself from those she has joined with before many will risk giving her their vote.


» on 09.28.09 @ 03:12 PM

Because of the vitriol in some of the SB Dem mindset, Cathie was dismissed when in fact she should have been seriously considered as a viable, smart, PROGRESSIVE candidate. The builders and developers have co-opted some of the noisy leftists, so therefore an attempt to demonize Cathie and Measure B supporters ensued. The fact that some of the Travis-endorsed nutjobs have also seen her value should not negate her intrinsic strengths and goodness.
I will vote for her and so will lots of my progressive friends who won’t speak up for fear of being attacked by mickey, daraka et al.


» on 09.28.09 @ 06:54 PM

Cathie McCammon’s association with the Francisco-Hotchiss-Self slate is a turn-off. She could have refused the Texas developer’s money, made a statement about her independence. But she didn’t, and that says something about her. What was the amount, $5,000? So that’s what it takes to buy Cathie McCammon.


» on 09.28.09 @ 07:06 PM

Cathie Mccammon understands, as the majority of residents do, that taller buildings in SB downtown does nothing to improve the housing/affordability issue.  The whole argument is a ploy of the developers.  Some people buy it and bellyache continually on these blogs.

I know Cathie as a long-time activist in this town.  Her values match the majority, and I think she would contribute greatly on the council.


» on 09.28.09 @ 07:49 PM

Cathie Mccammon understands, as the majority of residents do, that taller buildings in SB downtown does nothing to improve the housing/affordability issue.  The whole argument is a ploy of the developers.  Some people buy it and bellyache continually on these blogs.

I know Cathie as a long-time activist in this town.  Her values match the majority, and I think she would contribute greatly on the council.


» on 09.28.09 @ 08:02 PM

Cathie lost my vote by hooking up with Mr. Vonwolfswinkelmandujardenberg.  I think she said that she has not seen the affordable housing that was promised by developers in 1962 when the current height limit was set.  Open your eyes!!  14% of our housing stock is classified as affordable.  That is one of the highest percentages in the state, if not the country.  Ask the Housing Authority if you want to confirm and most of it was built since 1962.

The problem is Cathie doesn’t live in the Santa Barbara of us lowly regular folk.


» on 09.29.09 @ 12:20 AM

Please no more soft on crime, tax and spend, union controled liberals—we have had enough weak knee’d leaders.


» on 09.29.09 @ 10:31 AM

Land use, land use, land use. Where is her social activism and connection to low-income people, of which there are plenty in this town? Grant House and David Pritchett are the most progressive candidates who care about the little people. And for you conservatives, they are both small business owners. Furthermore, Grant is pro-development, and David is an Eagle Scout. Complicated isn’t it? I’m looking for candidates with back-bone.


» on 09.29.09 @ 12:08 PM

I consider myself liberal, and believe in social programs to help people who find themselves disadvantaged.  I also appreciate the natural beauty and delicate ecology of this area.  I don’t believe that being willing to overbuild, overcrowd and overtax (that’s tax as in “strain”, not dollars) the environment is equivalent to caring about low-income people.

Get real everybody.  Keep the issues clear.  Social programs help people.  Large building projects that “pencil out” primarily help those that build them.

McCammon’s on the right track in my book.


» on 09.29.09 @ 06:06 PM

I consider myself liberal, and believe in social programs to help people who find themselves disadvantaged.  I also appreciate the natural beauty and delicate ecology of this area.  I don’t believe that being willing to overbuild, overcrowd and overtax (that’s tax as in “strain”, not dollars) the environment is equivalent to caring about low-income people.

Get real everybody.  Keep the issues clear.  Social programs help people.  Large building projects that “pencil out” primarily help those that build them.

McCammon’s on the right track in my book.


More Local News »

Republican Tom Watson Running for Congress in Bid to Promote Change

The 23rd District candidate talks with Noozhawk ahead of Thursday's formal announcement

County Budget Concerns Fuel Dan Secord’s Bid for Supervisor

The Second District candidate says he's ready to use his experience to help turn local government around

Goldberg Files Nomination Papers as Republican in Assembly Race

Candidate to vie with Stoker for Republican nomination

Wolf, Secord Ready for Rematch in Race for 2nd District Supervisor

In filing campaign paperwork, Wolf cites record while Secord focuses on county's budget woes

SEIU California State Council Endorses Williams for Assembly

The council represents more than 700,000 workers throughout California

Weather: Fog/Mist 56.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive