Robert Scheer: Our Socialism Has No Soul

Our new system is similar in budget size to Europe's — but lacks the perks of universal health care.

By | Published on 03.11.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (3)
  • Share

Newt Gingrich is right: “It is European socialism transplanted to Washington.” How else to describe an economy in which the government controls the entire financial center and is now supplying life support for the auto industry? That’s on top of the existing socialist economy run by the military-industrial complex, which, thanks to President George W. Bush, now absorbs upward of 60 percent of the nonentitlement federal budget.

Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
Although we still have a way to go to catch up with the good parts of the European system, including universal health care, high-quality public education and decent working conditions, we do have a system that is now as socialist in budget size as Europe’s. That part I get when I listen to the right-wingers on Fox News bemoaning the reversal of the Reagan Revolution. But what I don’t understand is how in the world they can blame this startling turn of events on President Obama.

The vast majority of money allocated so far on Obama’s watch is an extension of Bush’s banking bailout, which has committed trillions to failed Wall Street conglomerates. I certainly don’t want to defend the bailout and personally think the banks and stockbrokers deserve to go belly up, but what does that mess have to do with Obama, who was in college when the Reagan Revolution launched the deregulation that allowed Wall Street to run wild?

Didn’t Obama inherit the current financial meltdown less than two months ago from the Republicans, who for eight years under Bush assured us that the markets were not in any need of tighter regulation? Wasn’t it Republican lawmakers led by folks like Gingrich who pushed though the deregulation legislation that enabled the growth of “too big to fail” financial institutions that now have to be saved by the taxpayers?

Nor has Obama demanded anything more in the way of accountability from those Wall Street swindlers than had the Bush administration. Under both presidents, a total of $170 billion was given to insurance giant AIG, and, as The Wall Street Journal reported, at least $50 billion of that money was passed on to top foreign and domestic banks without any public accounting. Indeed, the second in command at the Fed told a Senate committee last week that he wouldn’t reveal the names of the banks that grabbed our money.

Nor has there been any serious demand put on the banks to use the hundreds of billions in federal funds they received to increase liquidity. Indeed, the banks are raising interest rates and cutting limits on credit cards at a time when the government is hoping consumers will use those cards to pump some life into the retail market. As bank industry analyst Meredith Whitney wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed article, consumer credit card lines “were reduced by nearly $500 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 alone.” She estimates that credit card limits for consumers will be halved over the next year, mostly on consumers who have not done anything wrong. This will take “credit away from people who have the ability to pay their bills,” she notes.

So what we have here is socialism without even the pretense of a soul. Certainly that has been the case with the abject refusal of the banks that received government bailouts to be more aggressive in preventing home foreclosures. And the Obama administration has made it clear it has no intention of taking over the operation of any of the mega-companies that are in trouble, even when, as in the case of AIG, the government already owns 80 percent of the shares. The reason? Because that would be viewed as nationalization.

So what exactly would Obama’s critics do differently? Nothing on the bailout side. Instead, they have settled for carping criticism of the stimulus package, playing games by nitpicking lesser-cost programs while ignoring the big items that most governors, be they Democrat or Republican, eagerly want. The great fear of Republicans seems to be that some of the stimulus program might actually prove helpful to struggling Americans, but the Republicans can’t just come out of the closet and say so.

What they have picked up on instead is that Obama’s tax cuts provide some redistribution of income to favor the rapidly disappearing middle class at the expense of the super-wealthy, who have profited wildly from Bush tax cuts. Which brings us back to Gingrich’s complaint that Obama is importing European socialism. If that means a system of governance in which a robust middle class is rewarded for work with a strong social safety net supported by higher taxes on the most affluent, well, let’s get it on.

TruthDig.com editor in chief Robert Scheer‘s new book is The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America. Click here for more information. He can be reached at rscheer@truthdig.com.

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.

  1. No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
  2. No vulgar or discriminatory language.
  3. If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
  4. Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
  5. Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
  6. Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.

Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 03.12.09 @ 04:07 AM

Great to read Robert Scheer’s spiritual insights. The comments were both timely and SPOT ON!


» on 03.12.09 @ 11:23 AM

Mr. Scheer needs to go back in history, starting with the Carter administration, and look at the facts. This stuff didn’t just start with Bush.


» on 03.12.09 @ 03:17 PM

This guy is really unbelievable! The wealth of the wealthy does not belong to anyone else. It is not yours or the governments to redistribute. The middle class will grow and be robust when the government gets out of the business of being in the markets. Robert acts like a robust middleclass is another entitlement. It’s not and neither is a safety net.


More Local News »

Robert Scheer: A War of Absurdity

With remnants of al-Qaeda barely hanging on, it's time to declare victory in Afghanistan and begin to get out

Robert Scheer: Exorcising America’s Diplomatic Demons

China's 60th anniversary is a good time to reflect on the United States' long-standing failure to engage

Robert Scheer: Saving the Obama Revolution

It still might succeed if, especially on Afghanistan, the president listens to the base of people who put him in power

Robert Scheer: Obama’s Presidency Isn’t Too Big to Fail

The candidate who campaigned against Bush's blunders on Afghanistan, banking and health care, now embraces them as president

Robert Scheer: 9/11 Unleashed American Barbarism

In blind retaliation, we wreaked havoc on Iraq and continue to slaughter peasants in Afghanistan

Weather: Fair 65.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2010 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive