- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Robert Scheer: Sheila Bair Meets Corporate Greed Head-On
You probably don’t know much about Sheila Bair, but she is looking out for you, and that is why the big guys on Wall Street and their allies in the Obama administration are out to get her.

Bair is the Republican whom President Obama reappointed to head the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., but she is protecting the interest of taxpayers as no Democrat has in this administration, and she needs your support. Huge financial decisions are being made by this government, involving trillions in future obligations of U.S. taxpayers, and Bair has been a rare effective voice for the interests of ordinary folk.
Once an aide to then-Sen. Robert Dole, R-Kan., Bair was appointed by President George H.W. Bush to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and reappointed by President Bill Clinton. Later, she was named head of the FDIC by President George W. Bush. Throughout her public service, she has proved to be a vigilant protector of consumer interests.
Bair angered people on both sides of the political aisle by repeatedly raising questions about the radical deregulation policies that unfettered Wall Street’s greed. She has been a great watchdog of the public’s interest. That was acknowledged recently when she and former CFTC chairman Brooksley Born, the prescient hero who warned most clearly of the coming debacle, each won a John F. Kennedy Library “Profile in Courage” Award.
Bair has continued to show courage in her work. As The Wall Street Journal noted: “The FDIC’s influence has grown in the past year because of Ms. Bair’s willingness to challenge her peers, as well as her agency’s central role responding to the financial crisis. Ms. Bair warned about the housing crisis before many of her colleagues.”
The current point of conflict between Bair and the hacks who got us into this mess — and who have resurfaced as the key players running the bailout — is financial industry accountability. She started demanding that accountability last fall when the Bush administration began the TARP bailout, and she continues to do so under Obama. Throughout, her nemesis has been Timothy Geithner, former head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank and now treasury secretary.
The most glaring example of this conflict has been the battle over the management of Citigroup, the “too big to fail” banking conglomerate that became the largest in the world thanks to changes in the law advocated by Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin. Rubin then left the government to become chairman of the executive committee at Citigroup, a post he occupied as it made risky bets on derivatives and incurred record losses. Citigroup was saved from oblivion by a plan engineered by Geithner, whom Rubin had successfully pushed for the top job at the New York Fed.
That plan, endorsed by the Bush administration, left the U.S. government pumping $50 billion into Citigroup and guaranteeing an additional $300 billion of its “toxic” holdings. In return, we taxpayers were to receive preferred stock with the promise of significant interest payments, but now the terms have been changed. Thanks to Geithner’s intervention, Citigroup will be allowed to convert half of the government’s preferred stock into almost worthless common stock.
Enter Bair, who has been insisting, over Geithner’s objection, that major changes occur in the leadership of Citigroup to give the taxpayers a better chance to get some of that money back. She has an obligation to make that demand because the FDIC is a part guarantor not only of Citigroup banking deposits but also of the $300 billion toxic assets package.
In her role of protecting the taxpayer interest, she has been pressing for replacing Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit or at least more fully overseeing his performance. He took over Citigroup in December 2007, and while he now claims to be committed to reforming his bank’s operation, as The Journal concluded, “For his first year on the job, Mr. Pandit insisted Citigroup’s business model was basically sound.”
Bair didn’t believe the model was sound, and she has doubts about the ability of Pandit and other top banking executives to change their high-roller ways. As David Weidner put it on MarketWatch, “By threatening the things most precious to bank executives — their pay and jobs — she has sent a clear message to the industry: Your bailout is not without a price. We expect results.”
But, he added ominously: “Bair’s hardball tactics aren’t just irritating bankers, though. She’s also making enemies of career bureaucrats and Wall Street sympathizers. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner ... reportedly tried to push out Bair before he took office in December.”
Rest assured, if Bair loses out and Geithner has his way, Citigroup’s CEO and the other Wall Street moguls will be thrilled. But the public will have lost its most effective advocate.
— TruthDig.com editor in chief Robert Scheer‘s new book is The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America. Click here for more information. He can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.
» on 06.13.09 @ 02:24 AM
GLAD SOMEONE is looking out for us! Perhaps the Federal Bank Examiners functions should be shifted to FDIC, since they certainly ARE NOT doing even an adequate job currently - unless you get a complaint filed then acted upon swiftly with a Member of Congress, if lucky. Have long suspected the bank bail-outs—mind you: BOTH in the Bush and Obama Administrations—were cheaper than an underfunded FDIC, in event of a feared bank run by US consumers. Maybe, Robert, a future column could branch for this intriguing set of insights into how badly under-funded the FDIC really was and still is?
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Robert Scheer: The Democrats Who Unleashed Wall Street and Got Away With It
Bill Clinton and Lawrence Summers are still in denial about their role in the financial meltdown
Robert Scheer: Obama’s Faux Populism Sounds Like Bill Clinton
Speech yields little to suggest he would chart a much-needed new course in a second term
Robert Scheer: There’s Hope for Republicans Yet
GOP has become more blue-collar and more populist, and it's working wonders
Robert Scheer: Marginalizing Ron Paul as Presidential Candidate
He deserves credit as a principled contributor to a much-needed debate on limiting federal power
Robert Scheer: Christopher Hitchens Was Reason in Revolt
The late writer leaves behind a brilliant body of work, an indomitable spirit and an unquenched thirst for truth
Weather: Fair 44.0º
Search Noozhawk »


