- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Business
- Politics
- School Zone
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Santa Barbara School District Exploring Restorative Justice Model for Student Discipline

After a report on the Santa Barbara Unified School District’s suspension and truancy rates, the school board voted Tuesday to pursue a complete overhaul of student discipline and implement a restorative justice model.
In the coming months, the board will discuss policy suggestions, plans for a stakeholder committee and choosing one junior high school for a 2012-13 pilot program that operates with the new model.
Denver Public Schools is used as the template, but districts in Oakland and San Francisco also have implemented restorative justice models, according to Superintendent Dave Cash.
The restorative justice model used by Denver features a “ladder of intervention” that includes constant communication with the student. Discipline can be administrative, such as detention or suspensions; restorative, such as a problem-solving activity done with the offender; or therapeutic, such as counseling or anger management classes. The interventions consider the student’s age, severity of infraction, prior conduct, attitude and willingness to repair the harm.
Cash said it’s about getting to the root of the problem instead of responding to a student’s behavior.
After a presentation on the district’s student discipline numbers, the “elephant in the room,” board president Susan Deacon said, is the question of why so many more Latino students are being expelled and suspended. There was no answer forthcoming, and many districts around the country struggle with the same issues.
Cash said the disparity between Latino and white students in expulsions, suspensions, truancy and academic achievement has long been troubling to the district and is partly caused by “looser” disciplinary measures that can be subjective and the lack of reporting standards among schools.
High suspension rates, changing a school’s climate and improving an achievement gap are all reasons other districts pursue restorative justice models, and are “all in our rationale as to why we’re looking at it,” Cash said.
He said he believes the whole district needs a culture change, with better interaction between adults and students and getting students more engaged.
Board member Annette Cordero said the Santa Barbara district’s data are no surprise, but the district has to decide what it’s willing and able to do about it. She said there’s a school climate that makes Latino students feel disconnected and less likely to engage.
Cash said there are just five offenses that carry a mandatory expulsion, while the rest are more subjective for disciplinary action, which contributes to the problem.
Robin Sawaske, associate superintendent of education, said that although there is a clear disparity between Latino and white students, social-economic status doesn’t seem to play a part.
“Living in poverty does not affect this at all, as far as what our data shows,” Sawaske said.
There is a 2-to-1 ratio of Latino to white male students who get expulsions, suspensions and truancies when numbers are corrected for population size, Sawaske said. There were 3,873 suspensions and 43 expulsions in the 2010-11 year.
Male students are most commonly expelled for matters related to controlled substances, weapons/dangerous and personal injury/violence. Suspensions are usually because of disruptive behavior, physical injury/violence or controlled substances. Few female students are expelled, but 63 percent of the cases are related to controlled substances.
Among female students, there is a 6-to-1 ratio between Latinos and whites who are suspended, according to the district’s analysis of discipline data. Females are suspended most often for controlled substances, disruptive/defiance and physical injury/violence.
The number of truancies is steadily increasing each year, but some huge jumps may be caused by inconsistent reporting among schools as to what constitutes truancy.
Santa Barbara High School Principal John Becchio cited truancy as one of the most important issues the campus faces and, with clear expectations and more detailed reporting rules, has already cut numbers down from the previous year.
The policy of open campus at lunchtime was misconstrued as an excuse to leave campus throughout the entire day, so Becchio worked to recapture the intent of the open campus rule. Becchio said Santa Barbara High, which has the highest truancy rate among the high schools, had a lot of “human error” in tracking truancies as well, which has been managed with a restructured system.
The total number of truancy days jumped from 15,839 in 2008-09 to 22,341 last year, with most appearing among high school students.
A Santa Barbara County Civil Grand Jury determined that truancy rates have increased since the county’s program lapsed in 2008 because of funding and recommended that the District Attorney’s Office, the County Education Office and school districts work together to fund and operate the program again, which held truancy rates to about 20 percent from 1997 to 2008. So far, no such model has materialized.
— Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). Follow Noozhawk on Twitter: @noozhawk, @NoozhawkNews and @NoozhawkBiz. Connect with Noozhawk on Facebook.
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use
» on 01.18.12 @ 09:58 AM
The issue is parental caring and involvement. No-one on the school board or administration can see this?
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 01.18.12 @ 11:02 AM
It is a privilege to leave campus for the lunch hour. School officials should seriously consider taking this away from a) students who are violating this privilege by not returning to school or b) all students. Again, study your comps. This was a mistake in the first place.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
» on 01.18.12 @ 12:32 PM
Very glad to have read this article - thank you!
Feedback:
1) The title calls attention to “restorative justice” which you finally define about 1/3 of the way through in paragraph 7. However there is no further discussion - I would expect some review of if/how successful such an approach has been in other schools.
2) The facts as stated are potentially misleading. Citing the absolute numbers of truancy for groups is not meaningful to show ‘disparity’ between groups: you must cite the rate of truancy as a % or proportion of each group. If hypothetically the school was 70% Latino and 30% white, then you would expect a 2:1 ratio of expulsions. So, how do these stats compare as a % of each group?
This is very fundamental and obvious requirement for reporting and makes it look like you are trying to make the ‘news’ more alarming than it is. I expect more of Noozhawk.
You don't have permission to flag this entry.
More Local News »
Bragg Health Institute Installs Greenhouse at San Marcos for Environmental Horticulture
Providence Hall to Present Spring Concert on Saturday
Corinne Dorais of Santa Barbara Graduates from Juniata College
Marymount Students Get Their Feet Wet in Marine Science with SCUBA Elective
Righetti High Students Get Up-Close Look at Child Development with Preschool Program
Weather: Fair with Haze 69.0º
Search Noozhawk »



