- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Politics
- School Zone
- Youth Camps
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Hundreds Take to Streets in Support of Cesar Chavez Charter School

You could hear them before you saw them.
With police motorcycles and cars leading the way, hundreds of people marched to the Santa Barbara School District office to support Cesar Chavez Charter School, which is in danger of losing its charter.
Families and school staff, many clad in the school’s maroon uniforms, walked from Ortega Park through downtown while chanting, singing and cheering in support of the city’s only bilingual school.
“Si se puede! Yes we can!” they chanted.
They walked up Santa Barbara Street, cut over to State Street,then wrapped back around to the district’s offices.
Tuesday evening’s Board of Education meeting included reports on the school’s status, and the crowd overwhelmed the board room and an extra 111-seat room opened up behind it. Many people were left in the parking lot area to listen to the speakers set up there.

“Our kids’ education is the most important thing. It’s not fair that their school might be shut down and they had nothing to do with that,” said Edwin Solano, the father of two Cesar Chavez students. Veronica, a second-grader, and Diego, a kindergartener, both said they like the school, especially history class and learning in Spanish.
Other local schools are already shorthanded and crowded, so finding a place for Cesar Chavez students wouldn’t lead to a good learning environment, Solano said. “They need to take the kids into consideration,” he said.
The school reportedly has posted low test scores, which prompted administrators to say that the school may fail to meet the academic requirements to renew its charter. Its charter has to be renewed every five years, and it expired in early October.
At an October Board of Education meeting, parents spoke on behalf of the school, saying students were competitive by sixth grade.
Check back with Noozhawk for complete coverage of Tuesday’s Board of Education meeting.
— Noozhawk staff writer Giana Magnoli can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Comments
Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules.
- No abusive, defamatory or libelous attacks. In plain English: No personal attacks.
- No vulgar or discriminatory language.
- If you do not follow these rules, don't be surprised if your comment is removed.
- Please use the Report Abuse button on offensive comments.
- Share what you know, ask about what you don't. Give us your eyewitness accounts, observations, background and history. Tell us what else you want to know about the story.
- Stay on the topic, PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK, and forgive people their spelling errors.
Noozhawk's intent is not to limit the discussion of our stories but to elevate it. Thank you for your respectful participation. Click here for our complete Terms of Use.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.
» on 11.11.09 @ 06:34 AM
Why do we allow Mexico to tell us how to run our education system?
» on 11.11.09 @ 07:20 AM
Shut this school down now.
Test scores don’t lie, people do.
California ranks near the bottom of all the states in education.
And this school can’t even rise to those low standards.
Stop being PC and see reality as it is.
» on 11.11.09 @ 08:33 AM
As a jr. high teacher, I think it’s fair to only look at Cesar Chavez’s exiting students’ scores for the sake of comparison to other schools. An elementary school needs to prepare the students for junior high, however they get there along the way. If bilingual education is working to help students learn two languages at the same time as their regular elementary school curriuclum, more power to it!
It’s thrilling to see families passionate about education.
That said, I don’t envy the Board’s situation of trying to allocate an ever-decreasing pot of money to so many worthy causes.
» on 11.11.09 @ 08:52 AM
What is with these people? The school failed standards for three years. ‘nuff said.
» on 11.11.09 @ 08:53 AM
Acceptance of low performance is unacceptable. Fairness is irrelevant. These students deserve better. Shut this school down. It is not adequately serving the students or the community.
» on 11.11.09 @ 09:28 AM
Parents, wake up. Do everything you can to help your children achieve the BEST they can be. When I was a teacher in Santa Barbara, parents wanted the best school for their children, they would even fake their address to enroll their child in the best schools. Now we read an article about parents protesting to keep their children in a low achieving school. Seek the best for the your children, wake up.
» on 11.11.09 @ 10:23 AM
If Cesar Chavez Charter School students attain goals by 6th grade AND along the way learn two languages and cultures they are very successful and the program should have more support (including donations and foundation support for improvements) rather than less.
» on 11.11.09 @ 11:32 AM
It is disheartening to read uninformed comments on education and specifically about Bilingual education. The ignorant, racist comments. There is a whole world out there that speak many languages…People throughout the world speak more than one language this prepares them to deal with the different cultures and are able to communicate in a more informed manner. Monolingual, English only is not going to cut it in the future or even today…Why deny the children this opportunity…White and Brown children. Research shows that learning a language fluently takes 6 to seven years, It is reasonable to expect children by 6th grade to have passing to excelling test scores if the children have being in the same school with a consistent curriculum. Standardized testing does not show high level thinking but it does show average, regular, mediocre achievement. Read research on bilingual education. But perhaps people that complain just don’t like Spanish being the second or first language. What would they say if it was a French or German that was being taught. Let Cesar Chavez School Teach..
paloma community member
» on 11.11.09 @ 11:56 AM
I have two son’s 6th and 2nd grade that go to Cesar Chavez,
I can say put your 2 best students from any school and my kids will out perform them.
Both my kids where reading full books and doing math in kindergarten. When most kids barely learned there ABC’s.
My oldest son with long surfer blond hair can read and write in two languages and can translate when I need him to, since I only speak one language.
Before you just make uneducated remarks spend a day volunteering and see what this kids are really learning.
I think you should give added support to help instead of taking the easy road and closing.
» on 11.11.09 @ 12:00 PM
“Monolingual, English only is not going to cut it in the future or even today”
Neither will monolingual, Spanish-only. The English-speaking kids at CCCS already speak English, and are now learning Spanish. The problem is that the Spanish-speaking kids are being coddled in Spanish, and are not learning English rapidly enough. Thus CCCS is not really dual-immersion, but Spanish dominant. English is the world-wide language of business, science and technology and we are doing the Latino kids a disservice by not immersing them in it. We are doing the United States a disservice by not demanding assimilation, linguistically and culturally, by its immigrants.
Racism—let’s be honest. CCCS is really about maintaining and reinforcing Mexican culture in California and is part of Reconquista.
» on 11.11.09 @ 12:03 PM
We at CCCS do want the BEST for our children. We want the right to chose what we see as the best. Having a good test score does not mean you are the best to my family. It means you are good at taking tests. Even if you test lower in two languages, you still know twice as much as people who only know one language!
» on 11.11.09 @ 12:38 PM
I have a child in 6th grade @ Cesar Chavez Charter School. Our family is completely English speaking at home. My child scores above average in every subject and 95+ percentile in a few subjects. The students take the standardized tests in both English and then again in Spanish. It takes stamina, but they do it. My child could probably score a few points higher on the tests in an English-only Hope District School, but there are other things to consider. I have witnessed these students learn to accept all cultures, support and love each other and learn life lessons that I wouldn’t want them to give up. My child is now bilingual and I say that is a good thing. From day one the students help each other and work together in ways that no elementary school I went to ever did. I would encourage anyone who has taken the time to make hateful or rude comments to take the time to do their homework on this subject.
» on 11.11.09 @ 01:46 PM
If you want higher test scores and better education for all children, you must be a racist.
» on 11.11.09 @ 01:52 PM
The illegal immigration chickens are coming home to roost.
The test scores are low because the parents are not doing their jobs to be parents first instead of breeding without the means to support their children and make sure they do their school assignments so they learn appropriately instead of rely on the government schools for everything a parent should do instead.
» on 11.11.09 @ 02:01 PM
The cries of racism are just an attempt to bar discussion of the difficult issues of immigration, assimilation and national identity. Kudos to Noozhawk for tackling these difficult questions with writers like Mark Cromer and Michelle Malkin, unlike a certain other paper in town.
» on 11.11.09 @ 03:21 PM
There’s plenty of room for innovative education in California. General performance in all schools is embarrassing. Noozhawk should interview Jack O’Connell to find out why. He is paid (a lot) to learn and share the answers, and solve the problems
If the charter school can make it happen, taking a different path, so be it. It’s great!
But there seems to be a big gulf between the School District’s analysis of total test
scores, year by year, and the individual, anecdotal evidence from a few parents who
are thinking with their hearts.
If Caesar Chavez is not cutting it academically by norms that can be measured, and
sustained, compared to other schools, then it is not working as a school, no matter how positive a social experiment it is.
At a time when every California public school student is being short-changed by a
weak economy, large class size, poor English, math, fluency, history, science skills,
there is no longer time or money to spare on experiments that are not working.
The school district staff is providing data they claim show inconclusively that this is
the situation with Caesar Chavez charter school.
If they are deliberately mis-interpreting the data, or providing false data, then they
should be terminated.
But if their test score data and trend lines are accurate, then the total burden is on
the Caesar Chavez charter school to explain why they are not measuring up, and why they shouldn’t be shut down, as (another) well intentioned, expensive failure.
» on 11.11.09 @ 03:40 PM
Question….
Why do the parents sing the praises of this school and say their children are the best educated anywhere, but the school’s rating and scores are dismal?
Does this make sense?
» on 11.11.09 @ 03:50 PM
““Monolingual, English only is not going to cut it in the future or even today”
Neither will monolingual, Spanish-only. The English-speaking kids at CCCS already speak English, and are now learning Spanish. The problem is that the Spanish-speaking kids are being coddled in Spanish, and are not learning English rapidly enough. Thus CCCS is not really dual-immersion, but Spanish dominant. English is the world-wide language of business, science and technology and we are doing the Latino kids a disservice by not immersing them in it. We are doing the United States a disservice by not demanding assimilation, linguistically and culturally, by its immigrants.
Racism—let’s be honest. CCCS is really about maintaining and reinforcing Mexican culture in California and is part of Reconquista.”
There are so many things that exude utter ignorance in this statement I’m not even sure how to begin.
First,
Let’s talk about languages. Any college professor would tell you that English is NOT the language of “business, science and technology”. You want to talk business, you’d better learn mandarin. You want to talk science and technology you’d better learn German. So kindly realign your ethnocentrism.
Second,
Have you ever been to CCCS? Have you ever sat through a day at school there? If you did, you would know that mornings, that is 8-12 are done in English, in surprise, Language Arts. The afternoons, when most teachers do math, are spent in Spanish, that is from 12:30-3. So look at the hours, you tell me, is the school predominately English or Spanish speaking?
Last,
Let’s talk about the Reconquista. Are you aware of what it was? Simply,the Ottoman Empire took over Spain. A foreign power took over a Spanish speaking country and the Reconquista, was Spain reclaiming their land during the Crusades
A strong Mexican culture does not equate to this.
Do your research.
I would also encourage you to look into the test scores for yourself. They are posted on the CCCS website. There is a much bigger picture here, and I suggest you broaden your vision for a minute and look at it.
Try again b_reynaldo
And by the way, I am an American. A white one.
» on 11.11.09 @ 07:53 PM
Cesar wasn’t a hero for all I lived across the street where his thugs burned down a Packing House in Santa Paula. It never opened again and those jobs were lost. Over 90% Hispanic workers were out of work. Plus people don’t see that bilingual education doesn’t work. And is a way to keep the Hispanics down. Why is it people come from other countries that speak other languages and do very well in fact better than many American English speaking kids. If the Hispanics could see the forest for the trees they could see this. We need to Hold teachers accountable for how and what they teach.
» on 11.11.09 @ 11:02 PM
For all the parents who speak of their high-achieving kids who attend César Chávez Charter School as well as those who support its goals: Why not sign your full names? I say this because how do I know you are not one person who is blogging under multiple names and/or is afraid to present your case publicly?
I do not have children, nor do I have any first-hand knowledge of C.C.C.S. so I certainly allow for the possibility that those who advocate its advantage may be right. I also believe in educational choice and oppose the government forcing this school to close. In short, if this school is on average outperforming other schools, and if the students educated in its methods can compete with students from Japan and the more academically advanced countries from Europe than by all means we need to re-think our strategies.
To those who argue about monolinguilism: When I attended two school board meetings back in the 1990’s, not one of the parents who got up to speak in favor of bilingual education spoke—nor made any attempt to speak—in English. This is not about English being the worlds lingua franca, but the fact that it is the language which unites this country socially. Yes, I agree that people should learn more than one language, and despite having grown up in an English-only home and having not had the opportunity to live abroad, I can speak, read, and write Spanish well. Furthermore, I find it insulting to those who have come here from countries other than those where English and/or Spanish is the predominate language that they have to learn a *third* language because the P.C. police have decided that those from Spanish-speaking countries should not have to learn a second. (Hypocritical much?)
And to those who see English as a colonial language imposed on the Western Hemisphere by force, let me remind you that Spanish was imposed the same way: at the end of a gun, so the symbolic value of Spanish being an oppressed language goes out the door.
To the person who says that five years is required for fluency in a language, how do you explain how kids (and their parents) who come from Asian countries where the languages not only have nothing in common with English, but are not even written the same way, achieve fluency so much quicker?
To this cynic, I wish there were a public medium by which we could catagorically see the end results of the various teaching methods. I daresay that Japan and much of Europe are leaving us in the dust, and since their methods are the ones that work, I’d be inclined to favor those ways, but if C.C.C.S. can do as well or better, than more power to them.
If anyone doubts this is my real name, then check with Bill Macfadyen, founder, publisher and CEO of this news service, and he will verify who I am—having worked with me at the News-Press for a number of years.
» on 11.12.09 @ 04:06 AM
paloma wrote on 11.11.09 @ 11:32 AM “Research shows that learning a language fluently takes 6 to seven years”
One can cite research or one can make a casual observation and draw conclusions on what they see. Once again, how does one explain the many cases of people who come here and within a matter of months are reasonably conversant in English? Many years ago I knew a man who I first met when he was 19 years old. At our first meeting, it took my about 5 minutes to detect that he had an accent which was so faint I couldn’t make it out. I came to find out that he had come here from Iran when he was 14 and barely knew English at the time.
Once again let’s get to the real issue: The issue always boils down to creating a different set of standards for those whose native language is Spanish as opposed to every single other language group in the world. If this is not politically motivated—or motivated by $$$, then why can everybody except Spanish-Speakers be expected to assimilate quickly? Is there another agenda at play here?
» E_Diaz wrote on 11.11.09 @ 03:50 PM “Let’s talk about languages. Any college professor would tell you that English is NOT the language of “business, science and technology”. You want to talk business, you’d better learn mandarin. You want to talk science and technology you’d better learn German”
This may be true, but it depends on how the statement is interpreted. I have heard that German has the ability to convey more subtly conceptual nuances and if memory serves me correctly one can convey scientific concepts more distinctly in German so in that context, E_Diaz is correct. I cannot comment on Mandarin having the same advantage in conveying business concepts. Having said that, I believe we are talking about two different things: When one speaks of English being the language of business, science, and so forth, what they means is that if you have a meeting of scientists, businesspeople, educators, or any other get together of people from different countries around the world, the common language that they are most likely to have in common is English. Ironically, you can probably find a higher percentage of people in Stockholm, Copenhagen, and Amsterdam who speak English than you would find in some of the major cities in the U.S.
» on 11.12.09 @ 09:15 AM
To all those making neative remarks it is pathetic…if you do not have first hand knowledge of this school you should not remark. Your children do not attend CCCS so your comments are irrelevant, further more is it sad to see racial comments posted here as we teach our children at CCCS we are all equal, and for you who make these remarks if you have children they learn from you and will take your same ignorance of racism to our community you do not see this comming from our school. Seek information first hand about what you are going to comment about!
» on 11.12.09 @ 10:25 AM
Dear Bill Clausen, since you are so curious, my full name is Bridget Lackaye. I have a very high achiever in 6th Grade attending Cesar Chavez. I am not afraid or ashamed to state positive comments from firsthand experience about my child’s school. I’m wondering why you didn’t ask the people making negative comments their full names - maybe it is just one person….maybe it is you….....spooky.
» on 11.12.09 @ 07:39 PM
“Dear Bill Clausen, since you are so curious, my full name is Bridget Lackaye. I have a very high achiever in 6th Grade attending Cesar Chavez. I am not afraid or ashamed to state positive comments from firsthand experience about my child’s school. I’m wondering why you didn’t ask the people making negative comments their full names - maybe it is just one person….maybe it is you….....spooky. “
Nothing spooky about it. I was more interested in who you were because you people are the ones who are actually involved in the process and can give first-hand accounts as opposed to mere opinions.
» on 11.12.09 @ 10:12 PM
To Bill Clausen and others,
I would like to attempt to provide answers to multiple questions in the simplest way possible. For questions regarding test scores, achievement, measures, and qualifications of those who support CCCS, please refer to the school website and read any (or all) of the posted letters from University Professors, teachers, and other professionals in the field of education. I believe you will find much evidence that students attending CCCS are indeed achieving, how that achievement has been measured, and based on statistical evidence the expected trajectory of test scores for this school.
For example, Dr Lee of UCSB’s Graduate School of Education states, “Despite the significant amount of research that has demonstrated its effectiveness in the US and in Canada (see Baker, 2006; Cummins, 2002; Howard, Sugarman, & Christian, 2003 for reviews), unfortunately, judgments are often made based on averaged test scores across grade levels that do not take into account the developmental model of dual immersion programs.”
Additionally, James K. Miller, Adjunct Faculty Member, Cal Poly University, writes to support, “ the analysis of the dual immersion program evaluation for Cesar Chavez Charter School as presented by the School Principal Eva Neuer and her Charter Governing Board”.
As to questions concerning why parents would choose a school with such a low state rank, please understand that CCCS parents are aware of the school’s scores but are also cognizant of the fact that by the sixth grade student scores are comparable, and by High School, a time when test scores are the most important, Dual immersion children’s scores are superior to their peers. There is a plethora of other reasons why highly intelligent parents are choosing Cesar Chavez Charter School for their children that I will not attempt to explain at this time. For some of these reasons please refer to the Teachers Letter or the letter from Gordon Sichi, The Anacapa School Headmaster.
Please take time to read comments from the multiple “experts” who support Cesar Chavez Charter School. http://www.chavezcheetahs.com/cccssos/Letters.html
Thank You,
Tracy Ewing
Parent of second grade CCCS student and
Doctoral Student
Graduate School of Education
U.C.S.B.
» on 11.19.09 @ 11:23 AM
Hopefully, they keep marching right on down to Avenida Revolucion, Tijuana, BC, Mexico!
More Local News »
Montecito Union School Principal in Limbo
The school board releases her from her position as part of organizational restructuring, but says Kris Bergstrom can continue to work for the district
Author to Discuss the ‘Fix’ for Education
Trevor Eissler will talk Friday in Goleta about what's needed to improve the traditional school system
Congressional Art Competition Open to Local High School Students
The winning submission will hang in the Capitol for a yearlong exhibition
Cesar Chavez School Dinged By State as It Outlines Plan for Restructuring
Draft charter gets early support from district officials despite news that the school still ranks among the lowest-performing in California
Lee Stetson: When Exploring the Right College Choice, It’s All About Your List
To focus your search, remember the words 'reach,' 'range' and 'likely'
Weather: Fair 69.0º
Search Noozhawk »


