Cesar Chavez School Fires Principal; Sarvis Extends Proposal to Keep It Open

Actions at endangered campus increase stakes in negotiations and at Tuesday's school board meeting

The performance of English learners is a critical piece of the Cesar Chavez Charter School puzzle. While the Santa Barbara School District is trying to decide what to do about the school's expired charter, Cesar Chavez parents and teachers are working hard to address weaknesses in student test scores.
The performance of English learners is a critical piece of the Cesar Chavez Charter School puzzle. While the Santa Barbara School District is trying to decide what to do about the school’s expired charter, Cesar Chavez parents and teachers are working hard to address weaknesses in student test scores. (Bill Macfadyen / Noozhawk photo)

By | Published on 11.21.2009

  • E-mail
  • Print this page Print
  • Comments (48)
  • Share

Amid a frantic struggle for survival, the parent-run governing council of Cesar Chavez Charter School — Santa Barbara’s only fully bilingual school — has fired Principal Eva Neuer.

“She’s done a lot of hard work for the school,” said parent Jonathan Lang, a member of the governance council, which dismissed Neuer on Tuesday. “We wish her well.”

With the Lower Eastside school under threat of closure because of low test scores, meanwhile, Santa Barbara School District Superintendent Brian Sarvis has put forth a proposal that would keep the school running as a dual-immersion program, but under tighter control by the school district.

Some teachers and parents at Cesar Chavez are relieved by the proposal, but others are wary. The life or death of the school could hinge on the success or failure of some delicate, high-stakes meetings coming up Monday and Tuesday.

“We do appreciate the district’s willingness to work with us,” Lee Fleming, governance council president, told Noozhawk on Saturday.

“But we are not conceding the point that we are not comparable with the other schools (on student performance). We just cannot agree with that — that we are a failing school.”

The technical issue in question is whether the Santa Barbara school board should renew the recently expired five-year charter of Cesar Estrada Chavez Dual Language Immersion Charter School, where students spend half of their time learning in English and the other half learning in Spanish.

Like all charter schools, Cesar Chavez, located at 1102 E. Yanonali St. adjacent to Franklin School, runs on public money but enjoys near-complete local control, enlisting its own parent-dominated governance council to make major decisions. But every five years, it must go to the school board for charter renewal. The school’s charter officially lapsed last month.

District administrators, led by Sarvis, have said the school’s test scores are abysmally low — so much so that the school doesn’t meet state requirements for renewal. Parents and staff at the school have disagreed with this assessment, pointing to their own version of the data, which they say shows the school’s students to be performing at least on par with others in the district.

In any event, the school is popular. In its 10-year existence, Cesar Chavez has grown from about three dozen students to 256, and now boasts a sizable waiting list.

Now, as the school board prepares to determine the school’s fate Tuesday night — the 7 p.m. meeting will be held in Santa Barbara High School’s auditorium, 700 E. Anapamu St., because of anticipated high turnout — Cesar Chavez’s governance council is scrambling to address the district’s concerns.

In particular, parents and teachers have been working day and night to strengthen the language of the charter — which is akin to a charter school’s constitution — to better address matters such as the performance of English learners. Sarvis has said that just 18 percent of the school’s sixth-grade English learners scored proficient in English language arts, compared with 29 percent of English learners across the district.

They also have been amending the charter to include more mention of professional development for teachers.

On Monday, Sarvis will meet with the school’s governing council in an effort to forge an agreement based on his proposal. If successful, this could save the life of the school, as the ultimate decision-makers — the five-member Santa Barbara school board — have been caught between the two sides, and would likely appreciate a signed accord between them. Especially given the state-imposed deadline to make a final decision by Dec. 15.

But making an agreement might be easier said than done.

During an emergency meeting Saturday, some members of the Cesar Chavez governing council expressed misgivings about Sarvis’ proposal.

“I feel as though our hands are tied,” said Cesar Chavez council member Cristina Wood. “Is there any room for negotiation? ... If we say no to the proposal then is our school closing on Dec. 15?”

Cesar Chavez Charter School was founded in 2000 on the campus of Franklin School on Santa Barbara's Lower Eastside. Two-thirds of the school's more than 250 students are considered English learners.
Cesar Chavez Charter School was founded in 2000 on the campus of Franklin School on Santa Barbara’s Lower Eastside. Two-thirds of the school’s more than 250 students are considered English learners. (Missy Macfadyen / Noozhawk photo)

Specifically, Sarvis’ proposed resolution strips the governing council of its authority over the school’s instructional program, reducing it to an advisory body.

It does not call for charter renewal. Rather, the resolution extends the length of the current charter for the remainder of the school year. Then, it calls for the school to propose a new five-year charter altogether, with help from district consultants. (This could also require a name change.)

In addition, the proposed resolution includes a condition that some at Cesar Chavez find particularly bothersome: increasing instructional time in English for English learners.

“There’s no such thing as a dual-immersion school with more English,” said council member Maria Del Rey, referring to how the dual-immersion model is based on a 50-50 split between languages. “I am extremely, extremely nervous. We’re talking about a question of autonomy for our school.”

Others see Sarvis’ proposal as a sign of hope.

“I know he’s a politician, but it sounded like he wanted to work with us,” said teacher Vivianna Gonzalez, referring to a recent visit Sarvis made to the school’s parents and staff.

Lang urged the Cesar Chavez community to keep an open mind.

“There are a lot of similarities between what they (the district) want Cesar Chavez to do and what we want to do,” he said. “We have to find the common ground, but maintain the vision of the school.”

The proposal also would require the school to pay the district $40,000 for a consultant to make curriculum changes with the goal of boosting scores for English learners.

Still, Cesar Chavez parents and staff are not happy that the district has given them only 10 minutes to make their case at Tuesday night’s board meeting.

“This is outrageous,” Lang said. “I don’t understand how in good conscience they can give a school 10 minutes.”

As for Neuer, who came to the school in 2004, Lang said the council is constrained by confidentiality laws from talking about the circumstances surrounding her dismissal. But it isn’t uncommon for schools to change leaders when test scores are consistently low. Neuer did not return Noozhawk’s calls for comment Saturday.

The council is putting together an advisory committee to look for her replacement, and plans to launch a nationwide search for a successor.

When Cesar Chavez opened, the demographic makeup of the school’s roughly three-dozen students was about 87 percent Latino and 8 percent white. Today, the school has grown, but the ethnic breakdown has changed only slightly, to 84 percent and 10 percent, respectively. About two-thirds of the school’s students are considered English learners.

The campus opened in 2000 partly in response to how the Santa Barbara School District — and later, the state of California — abolished bilingual education in regular public schools.

On Saturday, school board member Susan Deacon said she hopes the school can live on.

“I’ve always wanted it to survive, I just was unclear about how to get to the point where everyone would feel good about a final product,” she said. “It looks like we’re finding a mutually agreeable way.”

Noozhawk staff writer Rob Kuznia can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Comments

Noozhawk's comments are moderated, but by posting here you accept your responsibility to follow our rules as part of Noozhawk's shared online community. Please keep your comments civil and helpful. Don't attack other readers personally, and do not use vulgar, abusive or discriminatory language. Use the "Report Abuse" link if a comment violates these standards or our Terms of Use.

You must be a registered user to comment. Create a user account

Log in




Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?

» on 11.22.09 @ 04:44 AM

The only purpose a fully bilingual school serves is to assure that people stay bilingual. It keeps people in their native toungue and relieves the need to assimilate and keeps cultures separate instead of integrated. It doesn’t do anyone any service. Or here’s a thought. Make a law that you have to learn English to earn citizenship. Oh, there already is one? Who knew?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 04:51 AM

I wonder if anyone has considered the possibility that test scores are low BECAUSE it’s bilingual? Bilingual education is a failure. Case in point. Just give them an ESL class and make them learn in English.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 07:48 AM

This only holds kids back—this is America, and this School is terrible—send the families back to Mexico—check for legal status—e-varify all family’s—take your country back..

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 08:49 AM

How sad that children will continue to be sacrificed by an academic program that fails all state standards and is “abysmal” and are held hostage to a twisted mentality that translates such factual concerns into racism.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 09:03 AM

After over 200 years of immigration and 200 years of immigrant success in this country why is it that Hispanics are the only ones that have to be educated in their native tongue? This is racist and insulting to the Hispanic people, and insulting to immigrants from other ethnicities who for some reason don’t get the same preferential treatment. The kids are taught that living here is not worth working hard for, so they lose respect for the country. They learn to expect the culture to change for them instead of them changing for the culture. They are taught that they don’t have to work hard, they will be catered to. NO wonder we have a gang problem.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 09:05 AM

They are also taught that they are too stupid to learn in English apparently, because they are different. Great for that old “self esteem” that liberals cherish so highly.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 09:06 AM

Ceasar Chavez, by the way, was opposed to illegal immigration. Look it up. How ironic.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 11:14 AM

The foolish liberals would never send their kids to a Mexican school, but you should??

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 01:17 PM

“In addition, the proposed resolution includes a condition that some at Cesar Chavez find particularly bothersome: increasing instructional time in English for English learners.”

Dual immersion means that English speakers are immersed in Spanish and Spanish-speakers are supposed to be immersed in English.  Cesar Chavez is not a dual-immersion school, it is a Spanish-language maintenance school.  I wonder who is on the long waiting list—guilt-ridden white leftists who hate American culture and success, and/or Mexican immigrant parents who resent the United States and oppose assimilation?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 01:18 PM

It is sad that Noozhawk attracts such ignorant, racist, eurocentric type of people.  These comments are beyond conversation or acknowledgement.  Paloma

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 03:21 PM

Meh. Conservative trolls armed with talking-point machines are on any website that publishes news. They’re indistinguishable from each other. No original thought, no critical thinking; just truthiness.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 04:25 PM

Paloma, I agree. It is painful to see this ignorance and bitterness.

Noozhawk, don’t these comments qualify as a violation of your rules? Although we want a free forum for discussion, the language used in these posts does not foster constructive dialog.

To those at Cesar Chavez school, you have my support and sympathy. I hope the board realizes the value of the work you’re doing.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 06:46 PM

So, CCCS makes it to the “improvement needed” category for ONE YEAR and you want it shut down.

Interesting. 

Do you know how many OTHER schools in SB’s school district are in “program improvement”?  Almost half of them!

The district, itself, has been in Program Improvement for THREE YEARS.

Put that in your pipes and smoke it.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 08:20 PM

As one who has been intimately involved with international school education programs, I find it unfortunate that the United States as a whole, and California in particular, will not truly teach English to its non-fluent students.  Elementary children in particular are remarkably capable of learning foreign languages at an incredible rate.  I have seen students start a school year with only a handful of English vocabulary words and finish the year fluent.  It has also been my experience that the natural consequence of this is that they teach their parents English.  To deprive children of this skill development on the mis-guided basis that they cannot compete in another language is discriminatory.  We are sentencing these kids to a second-rate set of opportunities.

Teaching kids English is not racist, and it is not even American.  For those of you who are not aware, the United States did not invent English.  But English is fast becoming the common language in the world, and those that are fluent in it have a much greater chance of taking advantage of opportunities around the globe to advance.  Even India generally shares English as its common language among the thousands of dialects that exist there.

Don’t sell the kids short.  Teach them English.  Make them use English.  You won’t break them.  You’ll only make them more capable.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 08:55 PM

Its that easy-asimilating is the right way—

America first—English only—

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 09:21 PM

While I agree that Caesar Chavez looks like it should be closed,  I would like to point out to “True Racism” that Spanish speakers are not the only ones who have had public school instruction in their native language.  It was somewhat common that in the upper Midwest schools would teach in German in the early 1900’s.  My father went to one.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.22.09 @ 10:40 PM

Wow, how ignorant are you people?!! HAVE YOU EVER STEPT FOOT IN TO CCCS CAMPUS? Do your research before judging! YOU ARE ALL IGNORANT! I have no other words to put it…

CCCS is a beautiful school, with a beautiful community of students, parents, staff and so much more. I GUARANTEE that if you would go beyond what the “media” tells you and find out what the school is about on your own, YOU WOULD WANT YOU CHILDREN THERE AS WELL! Go to any other county, and students there are learning two, three or more languages! It is the parents right to choose the education for their children!

WOW, SOMETIMES IGNORANCE IS A BLISS, DON’T YOU THINK?? SHAME ON YOU NOOZHAWK FOR ALLOWING SUCH RACIST COMMENTS! THIS SHOULD BE AN EDUCATED DISCUSSION FORUM, NOT FULL OF RIGHT WING EGOCENTRIC IGNORANCE!

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 07:06 AM

The “English only” folks don’t understand the purpose of immersion schools is to make ALL children bilingual and bi-literate. Children raised with dual language fluency will have higher success than mono language students in the 21st century.  Immersion schools across California are highly successful and Spanish is not the only language taught at them.  There are several new immersion schools established every year. 

The problems with Cesar Chavez School are twofold:

First, in order for an immersion school to succeed the target population has to be a 50:50 mix.  They are not meeting this standard.  The lottery should be adjusted so that more native English speakers and fewer native Spanish speakers are accepted, until they get closer to 50:50.

Second, the Charter governance team is failing to meet general education standards.  Most immersion schools are under the direct governance of the local school board.  If they cannot get their act together, the SB School district should “take over” the school, NOT close it.  The danger of Charter schools is that they are not necessarily held to the same standards as regular public schools.  If they can prove to do a better job, then great, keep your charter.  If not, you lose your charter and will be taken over by the school district.  This does not mean the school, nor the program, need to be shut down.

Stop the banter over the Spanish versus English and fix the core problems.  Immersion programs have a positive and proven track record.  Immersion is not the problem here.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 07:31 AM

Interesting.  After a series of postings debating the success or failure of bilingual education at CCCS, cries of ignorance and racism and, gasp!, conservatism are raised against anyone concerned about overall quality of education.  And again, as usual, those casting such aspersions have nothing factual to add to the discussion.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 07:37 AM

To “Ignorance is a bliss”, the proper phrase is “Ignorance is bliss”.  Where’d you learn English?

And calling for the Noozhawk editor to suppress commentary because you don’t believe with the content is a form of censorship inconsistent with free speech and a free press.  Have you read the Bill of Rights?  Where’d you get your education?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 07:41 AM

My Grandfather came to America in 1924 from Oslo, Norway.  There were no immersion programs.  He has to learn English, and learn it quick.  He was 14 years of age.  Norweigen was only spoken at home or at church.  I learned to speak English first, then Norge second.  We still speak Norweigen at Christmas time, and sing old songs in Norweigen.  Never occurred to anyone in our family that the school system should have taught us in anything other than English.  Perhaps to Paloma that makes me racist and ‘eurocentric’.  Just seemed like common sense at the time.  I truly feel sorry for these kids who are being used as a political pawn to further the agendas of certain groups.  They are being raised to live in another generation of poverty.  Who knows how much potential is being destroyed by holding people back at this age in order to ‘prove’ points.  Very sad.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 09:32 AM

While it may be true the English is most effectively learned by immersion, this is a consideration for the _parents_ of ESL students—it shouldn’t be the reason to shut down a legitimate educational option. To claim that the school is a place for Spanish-language maintenance seems (though that may not be the intention) to assume that the parents are resistant to English. This assumption about the parents of ESL kids is totally unjustified and it also ignores the parents of non-ESL kids.

Fix the problems’s remark seems on target. Bilingual education has worked and can—we just need to target the problems specific to this case. Perhaps that means adjusting the number of ESL students, but that’s a question for those who know more about the particular situation at CCS.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 09:47 AM

As a bilingual myself, a linguist and a teacher of English, ESL as well as Spanish, I find that the statements made by many are based on the media’s limited coverage and lack of information.  Studies from all over the world since the 1970s have shown that truly bilingual schools teach both languages to all students and those that are successful have bilingual students who exhibit greater cognitive development and an ability to function well in society in both languages.  How successful these programs are is linked to how early the two languages are introduced.  While some children may slow down temporarily in language development, generally they will catch up and surpass monolingual children.  Math skills and problem solving have been known to improve due to the ability to process in two languages. There is nothing wrong with being proficient in two or more languages and many countries in the world value it.  Unfortunately, bilingual programs in our country have often failed due to lack of buy in by the teachers themselves who may lack proficiency in both languages or are forced to teach this way without proper professional development as well as a lack of support from the community and school boards.  Cesar Chavez School deserves the chance to prove itself and with the right pedagogy and support, hopefully the school will flourish. While being proficient in English is important in our society to succeed, being literate in two or more languages is a definite perk in these economic and global times.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 10:12 AM

JohnLocke, there is no need to be dramatic—I’m not asking that people who disagree with me be suppressed. I’m genuinely curious (with a tendency to be concerned)about the Noozhawk practice of allowing response posts on all their articles.

Surely the rationale behind this is that it fosters constructive dialog. Yet it seems possible to do this without publishing all posts. It seems possible to distinguish between constructive posts and ‘mere’ emotional venting—especially when it verges on slander. (I have the comments from ‘The mexican School’, ‘Here’s news for ya’, and ‘No wonder gangs thrive’ in mind. )

But let’s set that issue aside. Assume it is impossible to maintain a principled distinction between the constructive and ‘mere’ venting. In this scenario, is it wise to allow commenting on all posts? Some of these issues are highly charged to begin with. Allowing people to spew forth their anger seems highly inappropriate on some articles (like obituaries) and potentially dangerous in others (for instance, after our recent fires). J.S. Mill certainly thought that we needed safeguards to protect us from these situations and he was a man pretty keen on free speech.

Anyway, I just wonder if Noozhawk and The Independent should consider modeling their policy on the BBC’s.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 10:13 AM

Different year, different day ..... Those who refuse to learn by history are doom to repeat it.  Yes I am a history major, an educator, and multi-generational native.

The “politically” correct” have twisted the Charter School intent and system (I include all charter schools in the district).  As a result expenses and end points are too often out of control.  Does anyone remember the name Michael Caston?  Former Supervisor, who walked into a district where “dual instruction” was the rule in many schools not the exception.  The results were dismal test scores, and too often students unable to exist in an English speaking society.  Supervisor Caston stated the defacto Spanish or dual programs would instead be transitional.  The process would be quickly transitional, to English speaking and writing instruction.

In 5 years of heated and nasty personal insults hurled at this fine educator he turned the district around.  Test scores climbed fast and stayed up.  The problem with the quote below is it shows an unfortunate bias that in the long term hurts the students.: ....“some at Cesar Chavez find particularly bothersome: increasing instructional time in English for English learners.”

(Oh, and yes, I used to teach in ESL Classes)

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 10:27 AM

There is no such word as “stept.”  Your post is a perfect example of “ignornance is a bliss.”

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 10:55 AM

To:  “Is this Noozhawk policy?”:  My comment re Bill of Rights was to “Ignorance is a bliss” who was in fact suggesting (in all CAPS, i.e. “shouting”) that Noozhawk should censor postings.  I don’t consider objecting to proponents of censorship to be dramatic; quite the contrary, I find something lacking in those who do not object. Free speech is free speech (except for the usual “fire in a theatre” example).  Besides, the term “racism” has pretty much lost all meaning since it is routinely used as an epithet in nearly every political argument.  There have been some informative posts in this chain, but not from the likes of “Ignorance is a bliss”, “Paloma”, and “Here’s a question for you racists”.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 11:02 AM

My grandfather came from Germany to Ellis Island penniless in the depression. He did not even GO to school let alone an “immersion school”. There was no such thing. Instead he immersed himself in the American people and culture and made a lot of great friends (all non-German) along the way. Using virtually no resources, he hopped a freight train, worked odd jobs here and there and took every opportunity he had to practice English. He became an American first, a German immigrant second. His kids (my mom) never even learned German. He worked hard for his citizenship. He worked hard to make a living. He was not catered to, he was treated just like any other American. He saved every penny, got married and they lived on soup from a hambone for a week, stuff like that.

He had very little but the one thing he had was the pride that came from the fact that he was building a life for himself without being catered to, with his own sweat and blood, and it built character. I admired him, he was truly a great man. I would have no respect for him if some other entity had done it for him or given him a hand or a handout.

He suffered discrimination during World War II against Germany. He understood that and worked even harder to prove he was loyal to the country. He eventually became extremely successful with no help from the government or an immersion school. It is insulting to Hispanics that to tell them that they can’t do the same without the help of liberals. It is crippling to their children to tell them they don’t have a chance without the help of the liberals. No wonder they join gangs and commit suicide, when liberals tell them they don’t have a chance because if “racist” white people. NO wonder they don’t want to assimilate, no wonder they don’t have any hope or self esteem. Self esteem comes from your own hard work and success. Take away the requirement to work and there truly is no hope.  By the way racism has nothing to do with it and the intimidation tactic of name calling has lost it’s power. Because we are nationalists, not racists. It doesn’t work anymore. Try something else.

You want to ruin what built this great country called the United States of America? Cater to immigrants.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 11:11 AM

Oh by the way - The reason for my own success? The example set by my Grandfather of hard work, personal responsibility, and self-pride. I never got a dime from him, and he made sure I didn’t and did everything on my own. He never helped me with anything at all. All he had to do was be himself to give me the greater gift of self-reliance and self pride - worth more than gold.  Even after he died. Not a dime. And I love him and thank him for it.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 12:52 PM

To all of you who scream “racist” at those who protest against illegal immigration:  “Eurocentric” is the kind of immigrant this country has welcomed and should continue to welcome.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 01:25 PM

Another Dog Bites Man story.

The school principal is paid to make sure the school meets minimum state standards.

If Cesar Chavez missed a lot of their targets and deadlines [and it sounds like they did] the buck stops with the person in charge - the principal.

Some readers are outraged because in Washington, Wall Street, Sacramento, no one
ever has to take responsibility for serious screw-ups (except for the occasional Scooter Libby fall-guy).

But in real life, it’s usually different. If the students, their parents, the school’s board
really did NOT know they had to meet local and state accreditation standards based
on minimum test scores, so be it. Maybe they were all a flock of Ostriches, heads
buried in the sand.

The principal’s job description, however, is to know, and to make sure deadlines
are met. If you fail so badly that your school is about to be de-commissioned, it’s
time to walk the plank for the greater good. That’s what’s happening here.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 01:55 PM

Let this failed school fail.  Why should our tax dollars fund a bilingual education for immigrants?  Come to America and be American.  I am tired of Liberal nonsense.  Hold EVERYONE to the same accountability and standards and we may actually see some progress.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 02:07 PM

LOL. “‘Eurocentric” is the kind of immigrant we want?”

I was heavily recruited to come here from a non-European country because, unfortunately, your country is failing so bleakly in education that you need to lure me here to keep your economy competitive.  And judging by the ignorant rants (all in English) posted on this blog, I see why I have the lucrative salary that I do.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 02:10 PM

This school has failed because the system called “bi-lingual education” fails. It sounds fabulous but the reality is anything but… look at Peabody Charter: they used to be bilingual, they insisted on keeping themselves bilingual even when the district changed its mind and decreed bilingual to be NOT so good… but years later, and with a new principal, they have abandoned the bilingual education and the students are doing so much better.I heard that they now have such good scores that they are being recommended for a Distinctive School award! They speak in Spanish in the earlier grades when necessary [K - 3] but the curriculum is English-based. The kids learn English very well - and it helps that they have continued to keep a full-time drama program for ALL grades. The kids are flourishing; they even have English classes for parents!
I agree that keeping non-English speakers without full-time English instruction backfires…
CC would do well to learn from those who’ve been through this already, or they will see an end to their school.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 03:12 PM

To “J Locke NEWSFLASH”:  It was a test and you failed.  I KNEW someone would pick up on the Euro part of Eurocentric, focussing on the race issue as usual.  But it’s not because he is Eurocentric that he’s a valued immigrant; it’s because of his values: “hard work, personal responsibility, and self-pride” and “did everything on my own”.

And yes, there are many ignorant rants in this chain - I named some of the posters earlier.  Your comment about failing education in the U.S. is EXACTLY why some of us think that CCCS, having failed its competence measures, should be closed.  What was the point of your posting, anyway???

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 06:57 PM

Wrong J.Locke Newsflash. Don’t flatter yourself. You were lured here obviously at an inflated salary because there were diversity quotas to fill. The education system has been ruined by liberal ideals, not because YOU weren’t here, but thanks for coming to save the entire education system. Go back home and save us some money. We don’t need to pay for your arrogance. Do you have a problem with Americans speaking English by the way?

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.23.09 @ 07:04 PM

Bilingualism doesn’t work. It’s just been proved. Close the school or modify it to teach EFL (English as a first language)not ESL in the early grades. Then teach them to function in an English speaking society IN ENGLISH. Problem solved, and you have done the kids a huge favor and helped eliminate cultural segregation and the resulting problems that are now painfully obvious.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 08:30 AM

There is an astonding amount of ignorance demonstrated in some of these comments.  Instead of commenting on the situation at the school that is the subject of this article, commenters seem to have found it necessary to bash bilingual education.  Having studied education, learning and language, the only conclusion I can make on this issue is that there is much more to learn on how most effectively teach language and the research does not support the vast majority of commenters bashing of bilingual education.  I truely believe that it is an issue that only the experts can comment on, as it is such a complicated issue.
Also, it must be recognized that all English learners (including everyone’s proverbial grandfather, who came to this county with nothing, etc., etc) are not the same and cannot be expected to assimmlate or learn English in the same manner.  The culture, socio-economic status, and voluntariness of immigration must be taken into account, as to reasons why and to what degree assimmilation occurs. Not to say that assimilation is a necessary goal.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 10:00 AM

Amazing.  Most people on the blog are blasting a highly successful education model and not specifically addressing the core problems with CCS.

As for the era of our grandfathers, that is when we created concentration camps for loyal Americans of Japanese descent.  They had their land taken away from them, and it was never returned.  German immigrants were distrusted, but not put in camps, because they were European and looked the same as other European Americans.  Jim Crow laws were also in full effect.  Is that the America people want to go back to?

Face it, we live in a different world.  Whether you are a conservative or a liberal, we need our children to be proficient in second languages.  Mandarin, Japanese and Spanish are the logical languages for California.  For the conservatives, our military is in desperate need of linguists.  Wouldn’t it be better for them to be “native” Americans than immigrants (the other half of the 50:50 in an immersion class)?  For the liberals, we need them for the Foreign Service and Peace Corps.  For the business types, we need them to conduct business in the emerging markets.

Fix the problems at CCS, and from the sounds of it, in the SB school district in general.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 12:07 PM

I don’t know the principal but is she really the problem?  I doubt it.  Sounds to me like she was thrown under the bus by “governance council” and Sarvis.  Reminds me of the Biblical story in which one is told to take the plank out of one’s own eye before removing a splinter from the eye of another.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 04:28 PM

When you do something right in education you get fired. This principal must be really talented.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 05:17 PM

Question:  Are the teachers at CCCS protected by tenure?  Apparently the principal was not….

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 07:19 PM

Oh now there’s an intelligent comment:  the nonconformist is automatically in the right?  Must be a 60’s retread.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 07:51 PM

To “Fix the Problem”
While persons of German descent were not placed in concentration camps, they were rounded up and taken from their families and placed in holding houses.  New and poorly documented statements have surface of such occurrences in Honolulu, Hawaii during WWll.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.24.09 @ 10:12 PM

Sound good..

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.25.09 @ 06:58 PM

No principal is covered by tenure. Only teachers get tenure.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 11.27.09 @ 10:47 AM

That’s what I thought.  The teachers, who arguably responsible for poor student performance, can’t be fired.  But the principal can.  Perhaps replacing the principal AND some of the teachers is what is required.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

» on 12.09.09 @ 11:12 AM

“John Locke” you don’t know what you’re talking about.  No teacher at CCCS is tenured. They are all at-will employees.

You don't have permission to flag this entry.

More Local News »

In a Flash, San Marcos High Students Create a Mob Scene During Game Against SBHS

School's 'Pride' section puts a flourish on Royals' basketball victory

SBCC Seeks Community Input on Continuing Education Programs

Three forums will be held in February to discuss course offerings, fees and the proposed Center for Lifelong Learning.

Santa Barbara Foundation Awards $75,000 Grant to SBCC Foundation

Funding will be used to increase student degree completion and transfer rates

Laguna Blanca Alumni Screen Surf Documentary at Santa Barbara Film Festival

Adam Pesce and Danielle Robinson are the co-creators of Splinters, showing Sunday at Metro 4

Laguna Blanca’s Miles Crist Named a Finalist in SBIFF’s Student Filmmaking Competition

Freshman says vacation footage captured in Europe turned into 'one of my better films'

Weather: Overcast 60.0º


© Malamute Ventures LLC 2007-2012 | ISSN No. 1947-6086

Web Design & Development by PixelFive