- Home
- News Grid
- Local News
- Green Hawk
- Politics
- School Zone
- Back to School
- Nonprofits
- Missing Pets
- Multimedia
- Arts
- Movies
- Calendar
- Outdoors
- Sports
- News Releases
- Columnists
- Blogs
- Opinions
- Classifieds
- Advertise
- Donate
- Partners
Board Votes to Keep Cesar Chavez Open for Rest of School Year

The Santa Barbara school board voted Tuesday night to keep the bilingual Cesar Chavez Charter School open through the end of the school year, but the school’s fate beyond that point remains uncertain.
The Lower Eastside school has been under threat of closure because of low test scores.
In a 3-2 vote, with board members Kate Parker and Susan Deacon dissenting, the board — in front of a packed theater auditorium at Santa Barbara High School — made a decision that failed to completely satisfy either side of a widening dispute. The conflict pits Superintendent Brian Sarvis against the parents and staff of the dual-immersion school, where students spend half their time learning in English and the other half in Spanish.
At issue is whether the board should renew the recently expired five-year charter of the school, officially named Cesar Estrada Chavez Dual Language Immersion Charter School.
Cesar Chavez, at 1102 E. Yanonali St., runs on public money but enjoys near-complete local control, enlisting its own parent-dominated governance council to make major decisions. But every five years, it must go to the school board for charter renewal. The school’s charter — which is akin to a school’s constitution — officially lapsed last month.
Sarvis has argued that the board should not renew the charter because its test scores are so low that the school doesn’t meet any state-set guidelines for renewal. (The school’s scores, he said, are in the bottom 5 percent of all charter schools statewide.) Instead, he says, the school should use the rest of the year to put together an application for a new charter altogether. However, despite his firm stance on renewal, Sarvis has softened his tone; two weeks ago, he spoke of school closure as a viable option.
Still, Cesar Chavez advocates dispute the school district’s test-score data, saying their own version of the data shows that the students are performing comparably with others in the district. As such, they argue that the school does qualify for renewal. In addition, they insisted that the school brings intrinsic benefits that can’t be measured in test scores, such as the value of bilingualism.
“It takes the moral imperative at moments like this to say, ‘You know what? The state is wrong,’” said Marisela Marquez of UCSB.
The Cesar Chavez camp also has said that the start-over-from-scratch option might be too expensive and time-consuming.
In the end, the board decided Tuesday to extend the recently expired charter to the end of the year. But it left unanswered the more controversial question: whether the school should put together a plan seeking renewal of the existing charter or apply for a new charter. That, essentially, puts the ball in Cesar Chavez’s court.

“It seems to me this argument of whether to have a new charter or renew the charter isn’t the point,” school board member Bob Noel said. “The point is to come up with a plan that addresses the issues. There’s going to have to be a sound educational plan.”
The two dissenting board members — Deacon and Parker — both said they wanted to keep the school open, but felt that the school stands a greater chance of survival if it scraps the idea of charter renewal in favor of a new charter. They supported Sarvis’ proposal, which would have shut the door on renewal.
“I’m worried the school actually jeopardizes its future more by asking us to continue the renewal process,” Parker said.
Now, the school’s parent-run governance council is left with a difficult choice. It can choose the less-expensive path of tweaking the existing charter, but that option is a major gamble, as Sarvis has clearly stated his opinion that the school doesn’t qualify.
The other option is to start fresh and try to write a new charter, which essentially would mean starting a new school and could necessitate a name change.
After Tuesday night’s board meeting — which stretched until 11:15 p.m. — Lee Fleming, the school’s governing council president, put the estimated cost of submitting a new charter proposal at about $30,000. That, she said, is a lot of money, given the school’s annual budget of $2 million, about 85 percent of which is made up of teacher salaries. Plus, Tuesday’s decision obligates the school to pay the district up to $40,000 for the cost of a consultant to help boost the performance of the school’s students, most notably the ones considered English learners.
“I’m extremely disappointed,” she said, adding that of the five board members, only one — Ed Heron — has visited a Cesar Chavez classroom. [Noozhawk’s note: Both Deacon and Parker say this isn’t so, as they have recently toured the campus.] “They essentially closed a school.”
Tuesday’s vote was based on a motion by school board trustee Annette Cordero, one of the founders of the school in 2000. Even Cordero seemed to recommend that the school submit a new charter.
“This is too important to lose simply for want of willingness to look at other things,” she said.
Among the hundreds of people packed into the Santa Barbara High auditorium Tuesday was former Cesar Chavez Principal Eva Neuer, whom the governance council fired a week ago. Council members have not given a reason for her dismissal, citing personnel confidentiality laws. Neuer did not speak to the board Tuesday, but did trade hugs with several Cesar Chavez affiliates.
— Noozhawk staff writer Rob Kuznia can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 07:41 AM
Sarvis represents the educational industrial complex. He can’t think outside the box and wants schools to conform to the profitable testing and research industry. Good luck CCCS.
http://www.fairtest.org/how-standardized-testing-damages-education
http://principleddiscovery.com/2008/05/16/the-education-industrial-complex/
http://www.hks.harvard.edu/news-events/news/commentary/education-complex
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 07:52 AM
Given all the issues involved with the CCCS current status, it looks like both sides have worked very hard to find some common ground. Both sides want to keep the school open. As Maricela Marquez of UCSB said at the meeting, there is a moral imperative to do what is right in this regard, and keep the school open. The letter of the law that might dictate the closure of the school is simply wrong and needs to be changed. However, the fact that CCCS is in this terrible position now, is the failure of the school and the county school board. They let someone fall asleep at the wheel for years. All it would have taken to avoid this situation would have been for the school to provide training for the students on how to take the tests. We have classes on how to take the SAT tests. This is nothing new. Everyone knows that a high school student has to learn how to take the SATs in order to score well. When both sides did not provide this training, they BETRAYED THE TRUST OF THE CHILDREN. Pete Relis would not have let this happen. How tragic is it that the school administration made it impossible for him to stay. The teachers, children and parents are to be praised - ” A “. The school administration and school board - ” F “.
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 10:10 AM
Not quite sure how the County School Board is involved with this, SBFrank. They don’t have any say over Cesar Chavez. But if you meant the school’s principal and the school’s governance council deserve an F, I’m right with you. They’ve really let their students down over the past few years. They’ve gotten rid of the principal, but are they going to sweep the council clean?
The kids don’t need to be trained to take tests. The English learners need to actually learn to read and write well.
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 10:26 AM
In response to HMMM’s comment:
“The kids don’t need to be trained to take tests. The English learners need to actually learn to read and write well.”
That approach is simplistic and not reflective of reality. PROOF - try to apply your logic to the students at SBHS or Dos Pueblos or San Marcos. Just tell them, their parents and academic counselors that they do not have to take SAT prep courses in order to do well in the SATs. Try telling them that all they have to do is speak English well and that will get them to where they want to go.
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 11:22 AM
What a waste..The is America, NOT MEXIFORNIA
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 12:09 PM
You can’t help being impressed by the passion for innovative education these diverse parents, students, teachers are bringing forward. Wish we saw more of that all through the school system.
But passion is one thing. Proper management, oversight, basic literacy, basic prep to go on to high school, jobs, families, careers, and not be left behind, or stuck behind a sub-standard skills eight-ball is something else entirely.
The School board and their paid superintendent must make sure that all schools and
all students meet minimum state standards, and have a chance to succeed.
If special terms and conditions, or academic probation, is required, so Cesar Chavez
can demonstrate unambiguous progress toward meeting minimum standards, then
fine. Give them a reprieve or a second chance.
If the families and board of Cesar Chavez think they should be exempt from those
minimum standards of achievement, then fine too. Let them give up public funding
and re-configure as an experimental private school, and jump through all the State
accreditation hoops with Jack O’Connell or something.
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 01:31 PM
Shame on you “we need this school.”
How dare you refer to our children as future gardeners and then hide behind an anonymous post.
Stand behind what you ignorantly spew with your real name, and prepare to face the truth from people in the community who know about Cesar Chavez Charter School because we are parents, community leaders or supporters, or keep you mean-spirited, racist comments to yourself.
Robin
mother of a Cesar Chavez student
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 01:42 PM
When the rest of the Santa Barbara High School District got rid of the touchy-feely, politically correct, “bi-lingual” - “diversity” means more than anything else- approach, then test scores improved across the board. It was proof positive that the “bi-lingual” (actually only Spanish language, not other languages) approach they tried was a dismal failure.
Why would any rational public school district want to return to an approach that was proven to be a failure?
Is it just something to placate the Hispanic immigrants, many if not most who have come here illegally?
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 02:11 PM
I agree to the comment that was made that “they let someone fall asleep at the wheels for years” Why didn’t the PRINCIPAL address this charter renewal issue earlier? The entire school was mislead by a PRINCIPAL who thought everything was fine and dandy?? Thank God CesarChavez FIRED her….but maybe they should have done that sooner and the school wouldn’t be in this mess to begin with.
Good luck CCCS
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 02:38 PM
What a costly mexican joke..
» wrote on 11.25.09 @ 07:02 PM
Our board of trustees and district administration are absolutely gutless. They know in their heart of hearts this school is a sham and a failure.
» wrote on 11.27.09 @ 09:43 AM
I don’t think you can lay off responsibilty to the Principal no matter how bad she may have been. It is the educational approach that is deficient.
It is compounded by the fear that if anyone dares to criticize anything about such a racially charged educational system, that they will immediately be accused of being “racist”, “anti-Mexican”, “insensitive” “politically incorrect”, “mean-spirited”, “prejudice” “a right-wing kook”. “Eurocentric” etc. etc.
These critics are the same “do-gooder” types of liberal (aka “progressive”) people who did not want to call illegal aliens or illegal immigrants by that correct description and accurate classification. Rather they opted for the more politically correct and “touch-feely” title of “undocumented workers” and other evasive labels.
This is the same politically correct crowd that did not want to issue food stamps anymore for fear of offending the recipient and subjecting them to scrutiny when they used them, so they came up with a “credit card” so that when these welfare recipients checked out at the grocery store you can’t tell they are recieving welfare.
This is the same politically correct crowd that won’t take any steps to see if the students applying for free lunches at school are in fact qualified for them. We have schools in this County and School District where 100 % of the students recieve free lunches. (free, that is, to the recipients and payable by the taxpayers). It was widely reported that at schools where certain kids recieved “free lunches” that they had plenty of money to by the fast food and “junk foods” or snacks offered at campus kiosks selling those snacks and they often did so.
This is the same politically correct crowd that wants us to donate food to places like “Unity Shop” and “Food Bank” and then close their eyes to those who arrive in their new cars to stock up on free food because there is no mechanism to verify those who are “shopping” there have any need greater than many who would never take improper advantage of such programs.
The “language immersion” education system is just another means of perpetuating Hispanic language and lifestyles here to the detriment of the United States, which is the host country. Every nationality in the world that immigrated here and did not speak, read or write in English struggled and learned the primary language of this Country.
It is not only necessary to succeeed in school or on tests measuring one’s ability in key subjects, but also is necessary to function on an everyday level here! One can do so without giving up worthwhile cultural customs or preserving a second language but contrary to the liberal crowd’s mantra “English is not a Second Language” (ESL classes) English is the “First Language (EFL classes) Spanish is the Second Language (SSL classes) whether it was the “first language” learned and spoken somewhere else, or not!
» wrote on 11.27.09 @ 01:44 PM
I am very sorry to hear that the Caesar Chavez school will remain open. To be sure it is a wonderful family oriented school…however it is also an island of Mexico in Santa Barbara! Not very conducive to success in America. As an immigrant child myself who had to learn English at the age of 13, I am totally against the continuation of education in ones’ native tongue after having immigrated to a new country and language. It is far too comfortable to continue in one’s native tongue. In order to learn a complete new way (especially language) it has to be a “must” situation to change…i.e. full immersion! Bi-lingual education has already proven itself to be a huge failure in California education. Why continue failure? Just for warm fuzzy feelings of community at the expense of the students’ future success?
I learned to speak German when visiting my cousins, a smattering of French from years of studies and English in 3 months because I had no choice!!! My mother taught herself Dutch (she was Polish-German by birth) as she married a Dutchman and moved to the Netherlands. She then learned English when we Immigrated to America. She also taught herself to read and write in Dutch and English! How? No choice and motivation.
Was it uncomfortable…yes..very, for a short while. Did we feel like outsiders? YES! For a very short while! Until we melded into American Culture. Was I different and teased as a child? Of course…it motivated me. Is my family successful in every way? YES! Do we still speak our native language? Yes! Do I still speak French…the language I studied for 6 years….no, I was never immersed in it! English is THE business language of the World…if our Hispanic Immigrants want to become successful, they need to immerse themselves into learning English, keep up the native traditions at home and church. Successful children do not join street gangs, commit delinquent acts, or have poor self esteem. They thrive within their new homeland and culture and are doubly blessed with access to both cultures. They join good gangs: sports teams, music, drama etc. All the wonderful clubs and extra-curricular activities our schools offer..a uniquely American gift.
As a former baseball Mom, I remember a favorite baseball saying: You can’t get to second base or home plate without taking your foot off first base!
I volunteer with economically disadvantaged high school teens, 99% of whom are Hispanic. I find it appalling that many of these student do not speak English well, and the pregnancy rate is incredible among very young students. I am sadly aware that their future will not bode success under these circumstances. If these kids were immersed into their new culture and learned to become proficient in English it would make a tremendous difference to their self esteem and the success of their future.
CLOSE Caesar Shavez School once and for ever for the good and future success of those children!
» wrote on 11.27.09 @ 02:10 PM
This is only the latest in the recent history of the SB school district that shows a district that is plagued by a lack of vision and strategic direction. The Sup is a functional administrator at a time when the district is in desperate need of leadership, in need of a CEO. This problem should never had entered a crisis stage debated at a board meeting. It should have been put into the context of what constitutes success in SBSD and not regulated to a political circus.
» wrote on 11.28.09 @ 08:33 AM
Reading the comments of “JAX wrote on 11.27.09 @ 09:43 AM”, I can tell that this poor person is lost in a sea of hatred, fear and resentment. He has to deal with how he was mistreated as a child before he can ever deal with helping others. He is incapable at this moment. Can anyone imagine what it is like to live with such a person until such time as his own personal pain is healed?
I think that “Carla Reeves wrote on 11.27.09 @ 01:44 PM” has a chance of possibly understanding the big picture. I suggest that she call the CCCS and ask to be allowed to spend the day at the school and see the great work that is being done and why. The social problems that she is referring to are NOT the result of CCCS. They are the result of the normal school system. I think that Carla has a chance at being able to understand. CCCS is trying to make the difference that Carla wants to see. - go, listen, observe, ask, learn . . .
May their minds and hearts be openned some day . . .
» wrote on 11.29.09 @ 07:24 AM
SBFrank;
The increased success experienced by the entire Santa Barbara High School Elementary District when they dropped the failed “bi-lingual educational policies” they had implimented for years, is proof of just how deficient the approach being attempted at Cesar Chavez Charter School is.
How you relate that to my childhood or project your own thoughts about anger, fear and resentment on my part is beyond rational understanding. Your childhood apparently taught you, that when you have no logical argument and are confronted with clear and undisputable facts you cannot intelligently explain, you resort to name calling to divert attention from the issues. This is a phenomena the psychologists call “projection” and is often used in discussion to obfuscate addressing important issues.
The Cesar Chavez school is failing in it’s meaningful educational objectives and it is hiding behind politically correct racism and separatism to justify it’s continued existance!
More Local News »
Santa Barbara School District Looking for Ways to Cut $6 Million from Budget
Classrooms are likely to feel the pinch, with programs and staff positions on the chopping block
QAD Presents $24,000 Grant to Franklin Elementary
The school will use the money to add two computer workstations to each classroom
Competitors Go ‘Prime’ Time at Math Super Bowl
A little drama adds to the fun as Westmont hosts mathletes from 10 Southern California high schools
Santa Barbara Middle School Fair to Spotlight Academic Excellence
Students will present their unique projects during Tuesday's Academic Fair
Parents Speak Out About District Proposal to Combine GATE, Honors Programs
School administrators say the plan is designed to encourage under-represented students to enroll in the higher-level courses
Weather: Overcast 50.0º
Search Noozhawk »
Today's Calendar events - 02.09.10 »


